ursues_1

About

Username
ursues_1
Joined
Visits
0
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
37
Badges
0
Posts
5
  • Apple offers publishers millions to train AI on archives

    michelb76 said:
    jacob_rad said:
    Though I praise the ethical stand point that Apple has taken, doing so will ensure their loss. The data that these companies will provide will be infinitely smaller than the huge mountains of data that companies such as OpenAI and Google have.

    Also, having to rely on third parties will only slow them down. There are claims that regulations will be passed which may hinder companies such as Google which is scraping the internet for data, I assure you nothing like that will happen in the states. Currently, the world is in a race and no country can afford to be behind, no government (barring EU, duh) is foolish enough to hinder this fledgling field.

    Also, Apple is a hardware company unlike Google which is a true software company, they have more areas to integrate and monetise AI.
    Nothing is stopping Apple from scraping the web, like the others do. They probably have been doing that already for years with their search engine. This deal would expose fresh content that is usually behind paywalls, and Apple would potentially get that first. Also, if Apple makes a deal with the publishers, those publishers might want to see money from competitors like Google and OpenAI to let them keep access.
    Scraping data isn't enough as LLMs have to be trained with it for efficiency ana and accuracy, AI is something where Apple has historically lagged behind, they aren't doing themselves favours by going this route.

    Also, if content creators start charging money then only Apple, Google and Microsoft will be able to pay which will automatically kill all other competition.I don't really want that to happen.
    williamlondonctt_zhbyronl
  • Apple offers publishers millions to train AI on archives

    danox said:
    jacob_rad said:
    Though I praise the ethical stand point that Apple has taken, doing so will ensure their loss. The data that these companies will provide will be infinitely smaller than the huge mountains of data that companies such as OpenAI and Google have.

    Also, having to rely on third parties will only slow them down. There are claims that regulations will be passed which may hinder companies such as Google which is scraping the internet for data, I assure you nothing like that will happen in the states. Currently, the world is in a race and no country can afford to be behind, no government (barring EU, duh) is foolish enough to hinder this fledgling field.

    Also, Apple is a hardware company unlike Google which is a true software company, they have more areas to integrate and monetise AI.
    So in short Apple should steal it? Apple can't win either way they go? By the way the quality of the data is more important than the quantity of data. Building anything in AI is going to require brains, focus, iteration and discipline.
    What good is artificially handicapping yourself, when at this point we can't even say if it's legal or not. Apple is only hurting itself.

    Google has decades worth of data and their deepmind division is the leader in AI research. The only reason they were behind OpenAI is because they were caught by surprise and are quickly catching up.
    williamlondonctt_zhbyronl
  • If you want blue iMessage bubbles that much, buy an iPhone

    jacob_rad said:
    I have seen Apple users more worried about this than Android users, who have endured green bubble stigma for so long that they no longer care.

    On a funny note, I know a guy who works in an Apple store who says that iPhone users are the most worried when their iMessage fails and they show up as green bubbles, more so than even actual problems such as broken screens or components.

    Following all of this on Reddit and other sites has made me realise that it's actually Apple users who care more about bubble colours to the point that a 9to5mac user wants to sue the DOJ and the FTC if they play any part in Android users getting blue bubbles.

    Seeing all of this makes me want to see Apple launch an Android client for iMessage.
    Yes, that much is quite evident at this point.
    williamlondon
  • Apple offers publishers millions to train AI on archives

    Xed said:
    avon b7 said:
    avon b7 said:
    Xed said:
    jacob_rad said:
    Though I praise the ethical stand point that Apple has taken, doing so will ensure their loss. The data that these companies will provide will be infinitely smaller than the huge mountains of data that companies such as OpenAI and Google have.

    Also, having to rely on third parties will only slow them down. There are claims that regulations will be passed which may hinder companies such as Google which is scraping the internet for data, I assure you nothing like that will happen in the states. Currently, the world is in a race and no country can afford to be behind, no government (barring EU, duh) is foolish enough to hinder this fledgling field.

    Also, Apple is a hardware company unlike Google which is a true software company, they have more areas to integrate and monetise AI.
    Google has more money than Apple?

    Apple isn't a "true" software company is what respect? Because they also design HW?
    I think he means that, as a company, Apple stills derives a huge amount of revenues from hardware. That is true.

    While services may be growing, the iPhone and hardware is, and will remain, the cash cow for the foreseeable future.

    Conversely, Google is financially dependant on software services products, and not so much, hardware. 

    Those services are not limited to the CE realm as they reach into science and industry too. 

    Apple's scope hasn't reached those areas. 
    What a non sequitur. Making lots of money from hardware has no bearing on whether a shop also produces software. 

    That’s like me saying Google isn’t a true software company because their business is advertising. 
    Producing hardware and software per se wasn't at issue.

    It was the balance between the two in terms of revenue. 
    No it wasn't. His comment stated that Google was a "true" software company which implies that Apple doesn't "truly" create any software which is fucking stupid to say and for anyone to defend. Even your "revenue" comment is silly because Apple doesn't sell their SW without the HW and their HW without the revenue. They are a paired product so you can't exclude the SW and claim Apple hasn't a leg to stand on simply because you see no SW when the display is off.

    Also, StrangeDays is on point by calling Google just an ad placement company if we go by your facile definition. Personally, I see Apple as being a very deep in SW and HW development, just as I see this with Google, MS, FB, and many others.
    You are thinking too much into it, to the everyday Joe, Apple is a hardware company whereas companies such as Google are thought of as software companies, thanks in part due to the media.
    williamlondonctt_zhbyronl
  • If you want blue iMessage bubbles that much, buy an iPhone

    charlesn said:
    I am so sick of reading BS statements about Apple "forcing" users to do this or that. Apple is forcing no one to do anything. In terms of sales, Apple remains a minority player in the mobile phone and computer markets. Android and Windows outsell Apple by far. Apple offers consumers the choice of having their hardware and software all managed by one company in a walled garden ecosystem with an emphasis on security, digital privacy and ease of use. If you don't like the idea of that... GREAT! There are countless non-Apple choices out there for you. The only people who consistently complain about Apple are people who don't own Apple products. The only people railing against Apple's walled garden are people who aren't in it. It's insane. You made your choice about what to buy, so get on with your life! If a central "problem" in your life is that your message bubbles are green instead of blue, there is something tragically, desperately wrong with what you consider to be important in life. 
    Apple is in no way a minority player in the US, they have a 50% market share and earn over 80% profit over all other players in the field.

    Android users only complain because iPhone users are the one making their life difficult, calling them poor, excluding them from groups etc. all facilitated by Apple in their various marketing campaigns and creating a social stigma around users of other platforms through decades of media manipulation. You and many iOS users don't complain about that because you stay inside the garden throwing dirt on everyone outside.

    Now, when you believe that fake sense of elitism is about to be taken from you, you come here telling people suffering from this stigma mocking them for even feeling left out, when you could just as easily avoid it as it doesn't affect you in any way.
    williamlondonmuthuk_vanalingamBlizzard