dmitrek

There are no tradeoffs except for total computing speed — whole transition to Apple silicon started from Apple Dev Kit (or Dev Transition kit) where A12 Bionic was put into Mac Mini enclosure, and it was already faster than Intel macs back then.

michelb76 said:
Curious what tradeoffs will be made. Most of the 'cost' is in the profit on the base and upgrades like RAM. Does this need to compete with Chromebooks?

Apple has a reverse charging on iPhones for years now. The only official enabled usage for now is a MagSafe battery pack - you could plug iPhone into power and battery would also charge.

9secondkox2 said:

Not news. The only way this was ever going to be a legit big deal is glasses. 

AVP wasn’t a hit. The 2nd gen will be a bit better - mostly due to ai software - but still suffer from being a headset. 

Untethered glasses that look like actual glasses/sunglasses will be the thing. Especially if they look like or are brand name shades (even if they are an apple design complete with signature Apple design. Not some nerdware. 

Just a passable thing to get second position in sales (right after Meta) in the first quarter of the sales). Nothing to look at. https://www.idc.com/promo/arvr

But how Epic can sue Apple if they are not a party to this, since they are banned from the App Store and Developer Program?  

Well it's good that he said that Apple is punished for the past behaviour. I think laws does not have backward power and past behaviour can not be objected.