photosynth
About
- Username
- photosynth
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 13
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 1
Reactions
-
Apple's generative AI may be the only one that was trained legally & ethically
foregoneconclusion said:eriamjh said:I don’t buy the whole concept of “legally and ethically” trained.I learned a lot of things from copyrighted books and movies, etc. There no such thing as protected concepts, thoughts, ideas, or words. Even IP is only protected from being “used” illegally and learning and understanding it isn’t “use”.I read a book. I paid for it. Maybe that’s the issue. Patents are protected from being used, not being read or understood.If it’s in the internet and not behind a paywall, it’s fair use to learn from.If I write a book report, is that infringement? If I am inspired by a work of art and I paint something, is that infringement? No.Similar to is not the same as “copied”. Authors and artists are just upset a computer does it and there’s no carve out in law for that… yet.
Secondly, procedural generation as in No Man's Sky, while also under the umbrella of the term AI, is very different from data-driven methods like neural networks (which are what the media calls AI these days). Procedural generation can also be purely mathematical and doesn't have to have hand-designed assets. But of course it has hand-designed math at the very least.