tiredskills

About

Username
tiredskills
Joined
Visits
23
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
155
Badges
0
Posts
144
  • Heavily upgraded M3 Ultra Mac Studio is great for AI projects

    Why on earth would I want to run an AI model?  Locally or otherwise?
    If you don't already know, perhaps you should pause on commenting in public until you've spent 15 seconds figuring it out.

    Suffice it to say that many people have very good reasons to do this.
    Such as?

    I am obviously not one of those people, so am asking why.  Your answer is not illuminating.
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Heavily upgraded M3 Ultra Mac Studio is great for AI projects

    Why on earth would I want to run an AI model?  Locally or otherwise?
    If you go to ChatGPT and ask "Do people have different computing needs?" You will have successfully used an LLM to answer your own questions.
    So the principal reason that you can give for running an AI model is to ask it why I should run an AI model?  

    Not useful.  As expected.
    blastdoorwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • What happened to all the games announced at WWDC 2024

    Control: Ultimate Edition

    Control: Ultimate Edition

    is a shooter, that contains the main game and all previously released expansions. It's presently listed on the Mac App Store for $40.

    It's already shipped for Windows, and is available on Steam for $9.99, with a full price of $39.99 -- the same as the Mac App Store. It's not clear if Crossplay on Steam will be available.

    Control isn't a multiplayer game, what crossplay would there be?

    EDIT: Do you mean if the Steam version will be updated to work on both Mac and Windows?  I don't know if there's a word for that, beyond "supported platforms", but I've never heard crossplay used in that context.
    watto_cobra
  • Heavily upgraded M3 Ultra Mac Studio is great for AI projects

    Why on earth would I want to run an AI model?  Locally or otherwise?
    blastdoorargonautwilliamlondoniooiITGUYINSDneoncat9secondkox2davwatto_cobra
  • Calls for Tim Cook's resignation over Apple Intelligence miss that he has made Apple what ...

    davidw said:
    davidw said:
    nubus said:
    Cook was an outstanding COO. He became CEO of the most valuable company and kept it like that for the most. Car, AVP, TV+ expenses, panic move away from China, and AI… he is no product or project person. He won’t push Apple forward.

    That is a misleading statement. Cook did not "....... became CEO of the most valuable company". When Cook took over as CEO (after Jobs passing in 2011), Apple, Inc. only had a market cap of about $375B. Apple Inc. did not become the most valuable company until over 7 years later, with Cook as CEO. Apple became the first $1T US company (by market cap) in 2018. The first $2T in 2020 and the first $3T in 2024. Not bad by any metric, for a CEO that bungled its EV venture.
    Not all that misleading.  Apple briefly became the worlds most valuable company in 2011, and vied for the top spot with Exxon for the following few years.  The $1tn market cap milestone was a different matter.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-08-09/apple-rises-from-near-bankruptcy-to-become-most-valuable-company
    https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/ExxonMobil-Overtakes-Apple-to-Become-the-Worlds-Largest-Company.html

    Maybe check these things out before rushing to correct someone with your half-rememberings?

    But Jobs named Cook as interim CEO of Apple in 2009. Cook was doing most of the heavy lifting in running Apple because of Jobs failing health.  Apple became the most valuable US company under Cook's watch. Cook didn't just inherit Apple being the most valuable US company (by market cap), he was running the company well before Apple earned that title around 2011, even if only off and on for the next few years.  Which may have been one of the main reason why Jobs officially named him CEO in 2011. It wasn't until Apple market cap hit about $1T in (2018) that Apple has become known as the most valuable company in the World and not just based on market cap, like it was in 2011. Apple has been  the most profitable company in the US since around 2015 and second most profitable company in the World today. 

    You make it seem as though Cook was just lucky to be in the right place, at the right time and played no role in Apple becoming the most valuable company in the US and then the World. All of those happened when Apple was under his watch.
    How do I make it seem that?  You're making stuff up there, and rather changing your argument.  The OP was explicit in saying that Cook was an outstanding COO, and no one has said anything to suggest that he wasn't integral to Apple becoming the most valuable public company.

    You are literally tilting at windmills while waving your internet dick around.  Stop making pointless arguments.
    avon b7ronnwatto_cobra