MacPack4

About

Username
MacPack4
Joined
Visits
0
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
86
Badges
1
Posts
7
  • Tim Cook talks wine, chocolate, and how Apple Watch saved his father

    Fun article, I appreciate you sharing this, Tim is an interesting guy and seems very down to earth.
    Alex_V
  • US senators question big tech, including Apple, on the reason behind inauguration donation...

    MacPack4 said:
    MacPack4 said:
    MacPack4 said:
    lol, Meanwhile $$$millions went to Biden 4 years ago from many of the SAME donors contributing to Trump, don't recall the outrage then... what short memories we have. So when Biden similarly got money it was not "possible corruption"? Give me a break. You do have to appreciate the hypocrisy though, it's great entertainment.

    In reality, the fact that Tim donated to Trump's inauguration shows how active he is in working with all people to accomplish his and Apple's goals rather than crying about who is in the Executive Branch. Much respect to Tim.
    Read the story again. It's a question because the same entities didn't donate, or donated a significant fraction less for Biden's inauguration. It's not equal, not even close.
    Lol, I only need to read it once but thank you. Pretty interesting how the same companies donated to both campaigns but now it's a concern? As for the amount, the FEC does not have limitations on inauguration contributions so the amount does not matter. But if companies and individuals are contributing more to Trump maybe it is because of inflation and not corruption! lololol... Senators (and maybe you) implying that high contributions indicate corruption is laughable, perhaps one should look at the discrepancy between Trump and Kamala's campaign contributions as an example of this hypocrisy.
    $43,200 vs $1,000,000 isn't inflation.
    lol, yep! Thanks for the fact check, I appreciate your ability to field a joke. Now use your sleuthing to do the Kamala vs. Trump campaign $$ discrepancy, seems like a lot of "corruption" going on there too.
    Ah yes, a troll. As fun as this is I don't think there's any point in explaining why so much money was contributed so quickly to the Harris campaign. Here's a hint: hope to prevent the darkness that is coming with the new administration and the joy we felt in seeing someone so qualified and personable run for president. But she lost because people's prejudice and fear won. They were told a lie so good they wanted to believe it. So they did and voted for a corrupt baby wannabe tyrant.

    We'll see how it goes.
    And there it is... bias... I do appreciate the banter between us, even though you believe I am trolling. I do think Tim is making a good move contributing as I am taking it as him saying we need to move on from the hateful rhetoric toward Trump, but to each his own. Please know dark times are not coming, we will be fine, just like the last 250 years, USA is going to live on.

    And a little pro tip, source your data, it's more convincing. Cheers!
    zeus423ronnJanNLwatto_cobra
  • US senators question big tech, including Apple, on the reason behind inauguration donation...

    MacPack4 said:
    MacPack4 said:
    lol, Meanwhile $$$millions went to Biden 4 years ago from many of the SAME donors contributing to Trump, don't recall the outrage then... what short memories we have. So when Biden similarly got money it was not "possible corruption"? Give me a break. You do have to appreciate the hypocrisy though, it's great entertainment.

    In reality, the fact that Tim donated to Trump's inauguration shows how active he is in working with all people to accomplish his and Apple's goals rather than crying about who is in the Executive Branch. Much respect to Tim.
    Read the story again. It's a question because the same entities didn't donate, or donated a significant fraction less for Biden's inauguration. It's not equal, not even close.
    Lol, I only need to read it once but thank you. Pretty interesting how the same companies donated to both campaigns but now it's a concern? As for the amount, the FEC does not have limitations on inauguration contributions so the amount does not matter. But if companies and individuals are contributing more to Trump maybe it is because of inflation and not corruption! lololol... Senators (and maybe you) implying that high contributions indicate corruption is laughable, perhaps one should look at the discrepancy between Trump and Kamala's campaign contributions as an example of this hypocrisy.
    $43,200 vs $1,000,000 isn't inflation.
    lol, yep! Thanks for the fact check, I appreciate your ability to field a joke. Now use your sleuthing to do the Kamala vs. Trump campaign $$ discrepancy, seems like a lot of "corruption" going on there too.
    JanNLroundaboutnowronnm4m40AppleZuluwatto_cobracharlesnNachtswaermertiredskills
  • US senators question big tech, including Apple, on the reason behind inauguration donation...

    MacPack4 said:
    lol, Meanwhile $$$millions went to Biden 4 years ago from many of the SAME donors contributing to Trump, don't recall the outrage then... what short memories we have. So when Biden similarly got money it was not "possible corruption"? Give me a break. You do have to appreciate the hypocrisy though, it's great entertainment.

    In reality, the fact that Tim donated to Trump's inauguration shows how active he is in working with all people to accomplish his and Apple's goals rather than crying about who is in the Executive Branch. Much respect to Tim.
    Read the story again. It's a question because the same entities didn't donate, or donated a significant fraction less for Biden's inauguration. It's not equal, not even close.
    Lol, I only need to read it once but thank you. Pretty interesting how the same companies donated to both campaigns but now it's a concern? As for the amount, the FEC does not have limitations on inauguration contributions so the amount does not matter. But if companies and individuals are contributing more to Trump maybe it is because of inflation and not corruption! lololol... Senators (and maybe you) implying that high contributions indicate corruption is laughable, perhaps one should look at the discrepancy between Trump and Kamala's campaign contributions as an example of this hypocrisy.
    hmlongcoDAalsethJanNLroundaboutnowronnm4m40AppleZuluwatto_cobraNachtswaermer
  • US senators question big tech, including Apple, on the reason behind inauguration donation...


    cpsro said:
    Re-elect a career grifter--now with a grudge--and this is what you get. Trump even bankrupted his own casinos, he's that savvy.
    Congress needs to legislate the Citizens United vs. FEC decision out of existence. The mutant GOP we have won't do it, though.
    Actually ALL of DC won't do that, every politician (right and left) feed off the donation flow coming in. Those who say they do not are lying.
    danoxronnB-Mc-Cwatto_cobratiredskills