cnocbui
About
- Banned
- Username
- cnocbui
- Joined
- Visits
- 15
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- -280
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 3,613
Reactions
-
Apple reportedly enlists aid of free-speech attorneys in encryption battle
Kaitlynn said:At issue here is the safety of American Citizens...what right does a terrorist have when it comes to that? And why would Apple want to defend them, or help keep secret any part of any conversation they may have had, or messages they may have sent, and to whom they were said, or sent?
If it were my company, I would open it up for this phone only, and any future consideration would be made case by case...
-
With 63% share, Apple Watch pushes global smartwatch shipments past Swiss watches for first time
-
User security, privacy issues draw sharp contrast between Apple iOS, Google Android in FBI encrypti
boltsfan17 said:Google's silence tells you where they stand on the issue of security.
-
Tim Cook calls FBI backdoor demand 'dangerous,' vows to fight case
enuf said:Apple's position on this is absurd. They should be working to devise a way to comply with the order and maintain security of all other products. The two goals are not incompatible. For example, require the work be physically contained and under Apple's control. The terrorist's phone does not leave the Apple facility. The FBI works with Apple's people on Apple's property with the agreement that the phone does not leave Apple's control with the work-around loaded into it.
The entire attitude should be about getting this job done while maintaining the security of everyone else.
Short of this or some approach along a similar line of thinking, the FBI should seek Tim Cook's arrest, fines and a period of imprisonment for Contempt of Court. If that fails to obtain the necessary response, further prosecution should follow.
-
Tim Cook calls FBI backdoor demand 'dangerous,' vows to fight case
The problem arises if the court order is technically feasible. If that is the case, they ultimately might be forced to comply. If that were the case, Apple could make it clear that their compliance would also result in them being forced relocate their iOS software development to a subsidiary in Ireland so that their US operations no longer had the technical capability to comply with such orders.
They couldn't re-locate to the UK because that place is worse than Russia for the states attitude to surveillance of their citizenry.
Switzerland might be a good choice also.