pigybank

rob53 said:

pigybank said:

No offense, and I'm not at all a Trump supporter, but if that is who the American people choose, then that is who they choose. This is especially frightening if people within the government themselves are looking to interfere in the electoral process. Why don't Tim and these big tech companies plot to help a candidate they support win instead?

It's not interfering, it's what's always done during an election. These people see Trump as a genuine threat to the US and it's their right to get together to plan ways to educate the voters so he doesn't get elected.

I'm sure all the non-Americans watching this fiasco are laughing their a**es off. It's amazing how many laws he's breaking while forcing his freedom of speech onto so many sheep. If he was the president and said half the things he's saying right now, he'd be put in jail. If you don't know what I mean, read up on the laws against discrimination to start with.

Well, like I've said I'm not Trump supporter, but we have freedom of speech.  You can say whatever you want legally aside from threatening personal harm.  That's a legal fact.  Trump hasn't said anything that's illegal to say.  As far as discrimination goes, the law already says illegal immigrants if caught are to be deported.  Trump saying he will deport illegal immigrants, or build a wall doesn't amount to discrimination, its simply saying he would actively pursue enforcement of existing law.  That is not a violation of any existing anti-discrimination law.  As far as a "temporary ban on Muslim immigrants" goes... that's still not illegal.  It may go totally against American values, but as a matter of law it is not illegal since the US Constitution only applies to those who are citizens of the US or who are physically within our borders.  Therefore any anti-discrimination law which might prevent him from doing this is not legally applicable to non-citizens not already within our borders.  I don't agree with his plans, but I am very familiar with the law and specifics of what he has called for.

No offense, and I'm not at all a Trump supporter, but if that is who the American people choose, then that is who they choose. This is especially frightening if people within the government themselves are looking to interfere in the electoral process. Why don't Tim and these big tech companies plot to help a candidate they support win instead?

Disabling protection against multiple incorrect password entries opens the phone to electronic brute force attack, but everyone in this forum already knows this because we're not complete morons like Loretta.

So what you're saying is that they pulled in less than half the revenue, and even less profit than Apple did... Apple stock drops, and Google stock soars because of "expectations"? What a crock.

mathieullf said:

I can't believe it took Apple 4 years to fix this... That's pretty embarrassing. 

Maybe helping sexually irresponsible individuals get rid of their unborn children wasn't very high on the priority list? Just a guess.  And if you need Siri to find an abortion clinic you probably haven't thought it through very well.