aderutter

The lighter borders will lower the perceived black floor and make content “pop” more.
I agree professionals in studios will prefer black borders. Fingers crossed for 32”.
I wished the colours were not as insipid on the chin and stand, the colours back and sides look great but would hardly ever get seen in my scenario; the front should have been the priority for colour. Imho.

Nope.

2020 iPad Pro and Magic Keyboard user here. I disagree completely with the article.

If I wanted to upgrade to a 2021 iPad Pro I would just buy the new Magic Keyboard.

People who would upgrade from a 2020 iPad Pro to a 2021 iPad Pro will in the main sell their old one on, the same applies to the old Magic Keyboard. No issue. I would also say that there is absolutely no reason why people need to upgrade from a 2020 to a 2021, the 2020 iPad Pro is still incredible and will do whatever anyone wants. There are no iPad apps that require the M1 Power yet and the nicer display is a nicety for a want, but not a need. Imho.

As AutigerMark says, I do not expect an accesory for a 2020 product to always work with a 2021 product. On the occasion it does, it’s a win but I would rather Apple didn’t stop innovating just so an accessory lasts for more than a single years product line.

I consider 1TB the minimum for my use.

I like the deep colour of the back and sides, but find the lighter metal colouring rather insipid.

I too can’t use a small 24” model and it would be a down-grade from a recent decent spec 27” i9 for example.

The wait continues.

You are both right.

A new store for multiple apps would require a new key/certification mechanism. Apple’s key/certification priocess could be used for the new app-store app that provides access to other apps, but a new key/certification process would be required for apps within that new store.

However, at present the Enterprise route does allow developers to create apps that can be distributed via the web to any user in the world - a list of UDIDs is not required - Meuller is wrong. This does of course contravene/break the agreement with Apple - as Enterprise apps are for use within an organisation and not for public distribution.

It does require the person who has downloaded the app to go into settings and “trust” the certification/profile though. Oh, and TestFlight is one option, not the only one, so is actually unnecessary. How do you think people did enterprise development before Apple bought TestFlight? So Sweeney is kind of correct technically but I still think Epic are totally in the wrong morally, hope they lose big-time.

As said above, a totally new key/certification mechanism would be required for a new additional app-store : I guess Epic would be happy to develop and provide that if they are the new owners of the new additional app-store.

Nice! Good to see it out of beta.

It’s also nice that the free trial is water-marked rather than time limited imho.

Of course I guess us hobbyists might be more inclined to use OctaneX at least for the first free year with new pro macs