jbilgihan
About
- Username
- jbilgihan
- Joined
- Visits
- 22
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 94
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 55
Reactions
-
Apple Vision Pro $3,499 mixed-reality headset launches at WWDC after years of rumors
-
Ikea launches new HomeKit-compatible smart air purifier
-
CBS All Access Apple TV Channel subscription will work with Paramount+
sdw2001 said:I’ll say it again. Give me all the star trek movies in 4K. And all the series. Then I’m in. Otherwise, nope.
The Original Series has been restored and is live on the site. TNG, Voyager, Enterprise, DS9 were shot on video in standard def and doing a 4k Uprez on them without significant investment in restoration would look like crap. -
Apple fighting movie studios to keep 4K films priced at $20 on iTunes
hmurchison said:MacPro said:sog35 said:spliff monkey said:sog35 said:retrogusto said:Apple needs to make the movie industry understand what Steve made the music industry understand years ago: the price needs to reflect the reality that the competition is free (pirated). It's basically an example of the fact that if you're not willing to disrupt your business model as the world changes, someone else will.
As fewer and and fewer people "buy" movies, studios will have less incentive to refuse to license streaming rights to their newer and more popular titles, and they will probably just sell to the highest bidder. If we end up with fewer mediocre big-budget movies about superheroes saving the world from destruction, so be it.
I think the the music streaming model seems to be working out pretty well, all things considered. My friends who were making a living with music pre-streaming are still doing every bit as well, but like most recording artists, album sales were always a small part of their income--it's mostly live shows and licensing. And streaming services are probably at least as good as the average record store for helping lesser-known musicians to become recognized.
It's different for movies of course, but as streaming services grow, there will be more money to go around. If studios have to take a chance on an undiscovered talent rather than paying millions to an established star, that won't be so bad. And I'm with Sog on this one--if you have a good story, you don't need a ton of CGI.
Its very difficult to pirate 4k movies. Very difficult. Like 100x harder than music.
You can download a music file in 5 seconds. It takes days to download/upload a 4k movie.
Because of this pirating movies isn't mainstream like how music was.
4k movie files (the high quality ones) are MASSIVE. They take massive resources to upload/download and host. You also need special software to rip those movies and get past encryption. Most of those programs are grey market and can open you up to virus. Also those download sites are filled with virus.
downloading a tiny music file is 100x easier than a 4k movie.
https://www.techspot.com/article/1131-hevc-h256-enconding-playback/
Pretty much solidified my choice to move everything to HEVC. -
Apple fighting movie studios to keep 4K films priced at $20 on iTunes
herbapou said:I own over 200 HD movies on itunes and I can tell you I will not be buying those same movies again just because its 4k. I was expecting a free upgrade of those movies to 4k.
I think 4k should not cost more.... Its the same content, just a different resolution. Hollywood wants to pull the same trick they did when we went from dvd's to blue-rays. Well guess what, nobody is buying physical media anymore, it wont work this time.
It is:
Created from a separate grading session (HDR) from the raw camera files, restored 35mm, or other 4k+ Source
Created in a different color space (p3 vs 709)
A new mezzanine level master is created to deliver to Apple.
Audio is typically redone to match the master (to be frame accurate).
Encoded with HEVC instead of AVC
Ingested into the iTunes CMS
Stored on edge servers on a CDN (taking up more space than the HD SDR Version)
Uninformed speculation does not help.