neverindoubt
About
- Username
- neverindoubt
- Joined
- Visits
- 64
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 308
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 120
Reactions
-
Hollywood writers' strike could lead to difficult times for Apple TV+, but Apple can handl...
williamh said:neverindoubt said:Nobody watches AppleTV+ now, it drew just 0.18% of US video viewing in March.
https://twitter.com/TVGrimReaper/status/1648700991267803136?s=20
The fact that their unwatched service has some of their unwatched shows delayed for a short while should hardly be a problem for them.
The quoted tweet does show y/y charges overall and for the “big” services.
But the Nielsen chart and the added text for the tiny services show the absolute share of viewing for the month of March, not the change. -
Hollywood writers' strike could lead to difficult times for Apple TV+, but Apple can handl...
Nobody watches AppleTV+ now, it drew just 0.18% of US video viewing in March.
https://twitter.com/TVGrimReaper/status/1648700991267803136?s=20
The fact that their unwatched service has some of their unwatched shows delayed for a short while should hardly be a problem for them.
-
Mobile carriers sell more iPhones than Apple retail stores
-
Apple Card is a drag on Goldman Sachs, says CEO
eightzero said:First: boo hoo hoo for GS.
Second: how does a credit card actually lose money for the issuer? I get that some people simply welch, and that the card issuer offers incentives in cash back, but AC is no different that any other card in this regard. GS gets the usual swipe fees, and I'm guessing AAPL gets a cut. The article cites a $350 cost for each customer, but wgi did they pay that to? AAPL? Or is this some sort of aggregate overhead cost cited to bring out the pity party for GS "losses?"
Third: boo hoo hoo for any credit card company.
Once you have a credit card customer, it’s hard to lose money on them individually, but your business can definitely lose money overall if the customers cost too much to acquire. -
Apple Card review 2022: Great for Apple buys, lacking everywhere else