indiekiduk
About
- Username
- indiekiduk
- Joined
- Visits
- 219
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 569
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 395
Reactions
-
MacBook Pro 14-inch M3 review: All about the fantastic display
M3 MacBook Air probably won't come or won't be what we expect so probably best to just get this M3 MBP now, although its heavy its lighter than the M3 Pro MBP with its extra heat pipe and fan.
-
M2 chip production allegedly paused over Mac demand slump
The 5nm M2 was a stop gap anyway because 3nm wasn't ready in time so it's not surprising they ended manufacturing early given 3nm is ready now.
-
AirTag hidden in luggage forces tourists to change vacation plans
if it was beeping it has been put in lost mode which means someone lost it some how
-
24-inch iMac with M1 benchmarks up to 56% faster than Intel model
I wonder who quit over the 7 GPU cores sales trick -
A 24-inch 4K monitor & Mac mini is a good option versus the Apple Silicon iMac
That's why Macs do pixel doubling. A Mac running at 4K has text as large and readable as 1080P but it is twice as sharp compared to actual 1080P. Windows can't do this yet, which is why there are no PC 5K 27" monitors, the text would be too small on Windows but its fine on pixel doubled Macs like the 27" iMac.maciekskontakt said:No it is not. Monitor in 24 inch size is way too small and it is ill idea of someone who does not understand principles of human vision. It is the same as marketing foolishness from years ago about 32 millions of colors while human eye can recognize about 300,000. Selling on technical specs does not pay off.
If you really want to squeeze more information on screen that is expressed with 4K resolutions then you need minimum 27 inch monitor or better: 32 inch monitor. Tiny fonts do not work when you have to start using eyeglasses to see them. 24 inch monitor is for 1080/HD resolutions and it is old standard at this point, but popular with many applications including some office work.
