mystigo
About
- Username
- mystigo
- Joined
- Visits
- 49
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 371
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 184
Reactions
-
Apple officially discontinues AirPort router product line, available while supplies last [...
cpsro said:Too bad! AirPort Extremes are rock solid and are still about the cheapest way to roam seamlessly between base stations on the same network using identical SSIDs. Newer mesh network hardware can do this but they're also proprietary and have their own limitations and problems.
That comment about the original AirPort having been bought is a lame diversion from the fact that Apple was the first major OEM to champion wifi. Like that excuses the company from exiting the business, when it had a huge lead over the competition. Simply, leads are lost if efforts aren't adequately funded going forward.
Q: what wifi hardware does Apple now endorse for use with its products? -
Apple in talks with PlayNitride to secure MicroLED supply for Apple Watch
I really hope Apple goes all in on MicroLED. This technology is the next wave. Ultra low energy, ultra high contrast, no back lighting, extremely bright, very pure color reproduction, extremely high resolution. It puts everything that came before it to utter shame. I know it won't be available on a laptop for many years to come, but it will be worth the wait, and if Apple can shorten the wait time, even better. -
New video shows drone crashing onto roof at Apple Park
-
Editorial: The super exciting failure of CES 2018
gatorguy said:
......And Samsung revealing an actual microLED TV "wall" at CES? Had no idea it was even possible yet. Samsung is obviously a lot further along with the tech than I realized.
...
https://www.ledinside.com/outlook/2016/7/sony_and_apple_micro_led_display_market_strategy
-
Google engineer proves any iPhone app with permission to access the camera is capable of s...
I work for a video conferencing company. I assure you that the reason we ask for permission to use the camera is so that we CAN take your picture and send it to the server. That's what it is supposed to do.
That being said -we do have a button that turns the camera on and off. I think what Mr Sad Face is really saying is that our app could turn the camera on without the user's explicit knowledge. The framing of his argument should have been more along the lines of, even if the user trusts the app, there is no way for the user to know if the app has turned the camera on. The way it was presented is apps that have been explicitly trusted should not be trusted and that this is some kind of exploit. He should rightly be mocked for that.