quadra 610

"According to...  analyst..."

But sure. I get that the current headline as it is will get hits. Biz is biz, I know. 

Still love ya, AI.    

rotateleftbyte said:

quadra 610 said:

fastbagger said:

Of course Tim opposes the ban. There goes his slave labor that he can pay peanuts.

Are you saying that everything 'built' in China is done be slaves or do you mean something different?

Individual said Tim Cook opposes ban because he doesn't want to be deprived of "slave labour."  The ban is for immigrants coming to the US, and has nothing to do with Apple's manufacturing - most of which happens outside of the US. As for Apple in the US, they don't use slave labour, nor can it be tongue-in-cheek even implied that Apple employees in the US are "slave labour." So even if some troll *can* say that Foxconn's workers are "slave labour", it still has nothing to do with the immigration ban. 

The person whom I quoted isn't thinking straight. 

Trolls aren't even trying anymore. 

glfrost@icloud.com said:

I was going to give Tom Cook benefit of doubt, but he does not seem to have same dedication to innovation Jobs did! Seems like Apple has lost its way-

http://www.macworld.com/article/3163518/apple-phone/apples-q1-iphone-7-slays-in-a-record-setting-784-billion-quarter.html

May they remain "lost."

Mac sales on the typically HIGHER END @ 5.4 million units.

Take note, folks.