quadra 610

Cuban posted a follow-up tweet on Friday, saying, "People missed my point yesterday. The point is that Apple IS A CENSOR for their apps. I'm curious why they have chosen not to censor twitter."

Apple doesn't (and realistically, can't) censor content delivery apps, like Safari, YouTube, etc. None of that is Apple's responsibility. 

Mark didn't have a point to begin with. 

If billionaires could forward their nonsensical industry-specific tech commentary to their PR people *before* they vomit it all over social media, that'd be great. 

Cook's right. 

Nothing but sensibility in his response and in the reasoning behind the case. 

Not sure what there is to actually spin about it, given consumers' satisfaction with the iPhone (and its battery life.)

The numbers simply don't support this accessory being anything other than just a useful accessory (that doesn't look bad, either.) 

But yeah, I love me some anecdotal nonsense...  feel free. 

dasanman69 said:

laytech said:

It serves a purpose for say field engineers or people in certain situations where they may need extended battery, but I have to agree, it is ugly and I hate to say it but can't imagine that would have sneaked through on "Steve's watch". With that said, it's an accessory and we don't have to buy it or like it, but at least if people need it, want it, they can have it. Serves a purpose and is functional.

There are already cases on the market, so why develop one? Is Morphie making billions of dollars in sales? How much of those sales can Apple grab?  

I actually prefer buying genuine Apple accessories rather than third-party. 

Quite a clever little accessory.