kiltedgreen
About
- Username
- kiltedgreen
- Joined
- Visits
- 86
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 995
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 673
Reactions
-
The Apple versus Microsoft hardware double-standard rears up again with the latest Surface...
GeorgeBMac said:AI seems to forget that Microsoft is not a hardware company. When they sell hardware it's mostly to exploit and demonstrate their software.And, with that, Microsoft left Apple in the dust.Nearly a decade ago they developed an OS that works either in touch-screen mode or touchpad mode. And, since then they have proceeded to refine and perfect it.Meanwhile, Apple is stuck back a decade or two ago where you still need to buy and carry two devices: One for touch-screen and one for touchpad mode.The Windows OS provides freedom to the user: he can use touch-screen when that works best then switch to touchpad when that works best.Apple is lagging behind.I can hear Steve now: "This is crap! Fix it!"... And, I am sure that they will. Apple has always hated it when Microsoft made them look bad.
Because Apple made the correct decision to make an iPad with touch screen and laptops without, Microsoft felt they had to differentiate themselves from Apple by combining the two. You say that the Windows user can use touch-screen when that works best. The thing is, its best is never as good as an iPad because it’s a kludge designed for force a desktop OS into a tablet and both are compromised for the worse.
also, in breaking news: Steve Jobs is dead and cannot talk to you and you can’t hear him. And a final comment from SJ:
“We’ve done tons of user testing on this,” says Jobs. “and it turns out it doesn’t work. Touch surfaces don’t want to be vertical. It gives great demo. But after a short period of time, you start to fatigue. After an extended period of time, your arm wants to fall off. It doesn’t work. It’s ergonomically terrible. Touch surface want to be horizontal.”
Appleout is lagging behind? Hmmm. -
AirPods 2.0 -- What we expect & what we hope to see
-
Everything new with the Photos app in iOS 12
I really like Photos - I have almost every single photo I've taken back to 1972 on there and it works fine and being able to pull my iPad out anywhere and find almost any of those 10,000+ photos straight away is a regular joy. But ... you still need a Mac to get the best out of the iOS version:
Can only locate/geotag a photo on a map taken with an SLR when using a Mac
Can only change a photo's title on a Mac
Can only add keywords on a Mac
The first two omissions are by far the worst. Image analysis is amazing but there is no way (yet) for it to identify a particular car model, a particular beach, a name of a pet, a particular party etc. etc. In photos for Mac I can add this information so that if I want to find "Fred's 50th" or "classic car run" I can do so almost instantly. If I had only iOS it would require a lot of scrolling around. The inability to add a photo's location may not be noticeable to many users if all your photos are taken on a GPS enabled camera but for those of us shooting on a non-GPS SLR it would be a real loss to lose all that location information both to viewing and searching. If you are trying to use your iPad instead of a MacBook you'll have to hold onto that Mac.
All things Apple could sort with little effort. -
WWDC was all about software, just like it was when Steve Jobs ran the show
nunzy said:Apple does NOT "view itself as a software company". Apple is, and views itself as a portable device company. That is how Apple changed into a world class corporate powerhouse.
Remarkable, isn’t it? -
New Samsung ad takes shot at Apple over iPhone X notch, battery throttling controversy
tokyojimu said:My iPhone 6 _is_ so slow, even after a battery replacement. Launching apps often takes 20 seconds. Does that mean I’m gonna buy an S9? I don’t think so.