polymnia

About

Username
polymnia
Joined
Visits
154
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
1,236
Badges
1
Posts
1,080
  • For space grey MacBook Pro with Touch Bar, Mojave Dark Mode is the new Aqua

    What a pointless 'story'. Why don't you guys spend time digging into why there are literally ZERO games out for OS-X SteamVR. There, see, that's something actually interesting and potentially useful.
    At the risk of sounding like an old crank: You do get the irony of claiming some coverage of gaming would make this article more “useful”. While I enjoy recreation like the next guy, I don’t find articles that do not cover recreation inherently lacking “usefulness”.

    of course I don’t play many video games. I guess my “productive” Mac use makes me more interested in this “story”.

    but hey, thanks for the “update” on SteamVR for “OS-X”. 

    Cool story.
    spheric
  • OpenGL, OpenCL deprecated in favor of Metal 2 in macOS 10.14 Mojave

    cgWerks said:
    Well, that's one way to get rid of the creatives.
    I wonder how many apps will make that transition?
    Adobe is going to sell Lightroom CC in the Mac App Store, right? That means that the Adobe Camera Raw component is going to go Metal at some point. And Adobe porting their other core graphic software to Metal would not surprise me. 

    its really hard to imagine Adobe not following Apple wherever it goes. They tied their wagon to Apple’s horse long ago.

    i guess there are other creative software vendors that make Mac OS software that may drop off, but Adobe is the one I use. 
    Sgt Storms(trooper)Alex1N
  • These Marantz and Denon receivers are AirPlay 2 compatible

    MacPro said:
    d_2 said:
    Wondering what company will build a low-cost airplay 2 compatible Wi-Fi receiver with analog audio out to plug-in to the millions of existing systems that can’t upgrade to airplay 2…
    Apple should sell  a modestly priced Airplay 2 dongle that has an optical out.  Apple used to make such things for earlier audio technologies although I don't recall if it was optical or phono out.

     In fact now I think about it, even an extra Apple TV 4 dedicated to Audio would be cheaper than replacing a high end Receiver that lacked Airplay2.
    AppleTV is certainly today's AirPlay 2 answer to the Airport Express' AirPlay 1.

    Maybe WWDC will lean into AirPlay 2 & HomeKit? There may be an opportunity for an Apple hardware product based on AirPlay 2. I'm not sure I'd bet on it, though.

    My thought is that the typical go-to HomeKit vendors will jump on AirPlay 2 since it seems to be managed via HomeKit. Maybe Elgato (makers of Eve devices), Koogeek or iHome?
    watto_cobra
  • Apple HomePod competitor Sonos lays off 96 employees ahead of expected IPO

    gatorguy said:
    gatorguy said:
    tmay said:
    gatorguy said:
    tmay said:
    gatorguy said:
    lkrupp said:
    tmay said:
    gatorguy said:
    So many smart speakers out there now and many more to come over the next few months. With some of them from the long-time audio companies like B&O and Bose and Sony and Pioneer and Sonos and JBL, there's no shortage of very good to great small speakers with assistant capabilities. Options like truly portable 360 sound smart speakers (ie JBL, Bose, Ultimate Ears and others) put them in a space where they aren't even competing directly with the must-be-plugged-in HomePod. 

    Apple will of course be successful with the HomePod (who has their kind of fanbase?) but with a single non-portable relatively high-priced speaker that has zero usefulness to an otherwise non-Apple owner they certainly have marketplace limits.
    I would use "user base" rather than "fan base" but the context comes out much different than what you intended.
    Yeah I noticed the same. “But it’s a cult!” and "Mindless Sheeple fans!" is the subtext here. 
    He’s crafty that in that way. Just another take on the “only stupid people buy Apple products” meme. Trolls have given up on the “doomed to bankruptcy” narrative. Too much egg on their faces. Now it’s the “Apple will succeed but only because stupid people buy their junk” backhanded slap in the face. Troll evolution and innovation at it’s finest. Somebody should write a book.
    When did fan base take on negative connotations? Not anywhere but here among some tiny subset of the "fan base" with ulterior reasons for complaining AFAIK.  So which one of you aren't fans of Apple? Speak up, don't be shy....
    Your previous statement reeked of "damning with faint praise", but more along the lines of, "HomePod is something only its own mother would love".

    Still, I'm guessing that you feel much better with a rant about your teams's product being superior to another team's product...
    You already know better and it's disappointing that you of all members here would make up claims about what someone said (easy enough to find exactly what I said) just to support an IMO very silly and very petty agenda. I've had more respect for you.

    BTW, fan base is not a term that would upset anyone... normally. My college has a fan base, as does my Lightning hockey team, and I doubt any of them would appreciate that being called "mindless" for being fans. 

    Try spending more time discussing what is actually said and how valid the points are rather than using letting your imagination run wild for possible hidden meanings.

    Does Apple have a massive fanbase? Yes
    Does that fanbase help give Apple products more immediate traction and a better chance at success than some less historically reputable companies? Yes
    Are there good sounding smart speakers that Apple does not offer competition for? Yes
    Does Apple have current competition in the ac-tethered "great-sounding" smart-speaker space?  Yes
    Are the traditional audio companies moving into that market too? Yes
    Is a HomePod generally unfit for purpose to someone not using other Apple products? Yes

    So where's the disagreement. Well gosh if you can't argue the facts maybe standing on one leg and squinting real hard there might be some word in there that you can make up some negative connotation for. 

    Next....
    You seem to lack the self awareness to realize that you come across to myself and many others here at AI, most of the time, as a Google Fan, more so than the typical Google User, using your implied criteria.

    Your casual use of "fan" as an pejorative for Apple's product successes rather than the obvious, large, and generally very satisfied user base, certainly colors any argument you make about comparative product features or advantages. Hence, why I noted that you damn the HomePod with faint praise, which you absolutely did.
    I see "I'm a fan " here at AI far more than "I'm a user". Still that seems to be the only objection you've been able to put together regarding the what-you-see-as-an-offensive post? One generally innocuous word....
    Were you any other forum user that may be the case. But considering the constant agenda you push for Google, and your repeated admissions and clear lack of understanding about Apple products (won't go into again), it creates a pattern. You're often a FUD dispenser, so one can reasonably attach secondary meaning to your chosen language. You never seem to like being called out for it but the pattern speaks for itself.
    To you it apparently does speak for itself. I think your off-the-cuff dismissal of other AI members concerns re: Apple stuff and/or knee-jerk admonishment of even long-time Apple fans (there's that ugly word again) for questioning in the first place "speaks for itself". So what? Does what I think of your posts keep you awake at night? Ditto. Neither of us matter in the bigger scheme. Unless that was your dog I kicked during the bike ride you have no rational reason for your silly personal vendetta IMO. Apple didn't make a nickel from anything you wrote here today, nor lose a single sale from anything I had to say. Loving or hating Google also had zero effect on Apple's business. Why would hating Google be a requirement for admission to your club?

    No I don't think I "push" for Google, recommend them over Apple, promote them in threads that have nothing to do with them and other trollish activities.  You find it more bothersome that I'm not a Google hater IMO. I can see the good stuff along with the (IMO) bad.

    Yeah I am certainly a "fan" of many of Google's services, ie Photos, Search, Google Music, Maps and Drive come to mind. No dispute from me. But not so much a fan of Google WiFi escapades or their Safari disinformation tactics,or their develop it then drop it strategies, or their sometimes poor focus on the goal. or their siphoning of sooo much information, or their unexplainable failure to give Sun a little sumpin' sumpin' when developing Android.  I look forward to the day that giving me great personal services doesn't require keeping around great gobs of personal data to do so and to their credit they're slowly getting there, recognizing the scenery is changing. But I won't stoop to making stuff up to suit an agenda, pro or con. We should all be able to say the same. 

    I get that some members might have no problem with letting FUD pass by (and often do) if it involves a perceived Apple competitor, maybe even post it themselves if they think no one will notice. make believe it's fact and "everyone knows". I don't roll like that which should be appreciated.
    OMG you guys are sooooo boring. 
    crowleyfranklinjackcon
  • Nokia to sell off failed health division to Withings co-founder

    Good news. I really like my Withings health stuff. But I was preparing for a day when they no longer spoke to HealthKit. With the founder back in charge, I'm hopeful that petty fights over health data ecosystems will be put to bed.

    I just hope he hangs onto the business for the long term.
    razorpitEvilleBillcaladanianbshankwatto_cobra