polymnia
About
- Username
- polymnia
- Joined
- Visits
- 154
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,236
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 1,080
Reactions
-
Lengthy iOS 10.3 install time likely due to conversion to new Apple File System
rotateleftbyte said:Wooloomooloo said:sog35 said:took me 10 seconds.
I am not sure why the 1st idiot to answer this thread had to talk out of his/her arse. My iPhone 6 took a little over 90 mins.
I now now enjoy the site again 👍🏼 -
YouTube restricts iOS 14 picture-in-picture feature to Premium subscribers, 4K not availab...
-
Apple's Mac Studio launches with new M1 Ultra chip in a compact package
They put shit on the front. I can’t believe it. They said it couldn't be done!
My next Mac, for sure. This covers all the pro users who have been buying burly iMacs for the last 10 years. I’m one of these. Those for whom a Mac Pro is overkill, but wish to avoid buying a new monitor with every update to the computing device.I’m sure there will be complaints about the lack of internal expansion. I’m choosing to look at the glass overflowing with performance out-of-the-box. They make Mac Pro for the tinkerers. This one is for us. The non-tinkering pros. Not a contradiction in terms, Apple even made us our own special Mac. -
Apple debuts new $5999 Mac Pro with up to 28-core Xeon processors
wizard69 said:netrox said:Love how amateurs complain about the costs of Mac Pro... it's for Professionals making lots of money... not for amateurs living on a few hundreds. iMac Pro is for prosumers. Mac Pro is for professionals. iMac is for consumers (but they can do all the things that pros do but at a much slower speed).netrox said:Love how amateurs complain about the costs of Mac Pro... it's for Professionals making lots of money... not for amateurs living on a few hundreds. iMac Pro is for prosumers. Mac Pro is for professionals. iMac is for consumers (but they can do all the things that pros do but at a much slower speed).
In case you are wondering that is sales so bad that Apple can’t justify the engineering expense to maintain it. Apple needed a machine that would sell multiple thousands per month not a few hundred per month.
By 2010 iMacs were capable enough that many creatives began using them instead.
To stay relevant, a Pro desktop really should be designed to completely destroy the all-in-one designs.
That's my opinion, anyway. -
Apple's Mac refresh includes universal drop in SSD upgrade prices
-
Hands on with Apple's new Pro Macs -- Mac Pro & Mac Studio with M2 Ultra
Draco said:In three years, a MacBook Air will be faster than this machine. -
Plugin now required to use most Pantone Colors in Adobe products
13485 said:ravnorodom said:Have Adobe purchasing RAL or DIC color system right off and make it their own. Hell, even get Sherman Williams or Benjamin Moore on board and figure out something. Adobe squashed QuarkXpress before with InDesign and I think they can do it again to Pantone.
Regardless, as long as you have a LAB value that matches your reference swatch, it's no more problematic than Pantone. The trick is getting a printer to mix custom ink colors to match non-Pantone colors. Mixing pantone inks is a well-known process. Mixing custom colors is trickier.
-
Apple's new Mac mini finally arrives with 5X performance, Thunderbolt 3, more
SpamSandwich said:netling said:$4,199 for the Maxed out mini! While I'm hopeful that the ram will be upgraded via third party ram (read $1,000 less!), the fact is the SSD is Apple proprietary and so either you upgrade when you order or your pretty stuck until used minis start showing up on eBay.
Unfortunately, I feel Apple is losing touch with reality and that Tim Cook has surrounded himself with rich "yes" people, as the mini was originally made so the "poor" could afford a entry level computer, today that stopped as $800 is not affordable compared to entry level PC's, this logic also applies to iPads. Apple needs to introduce a sub-$500 entry level computer that would allow the masses to embrace. Ie, the mini default ram should be 16 and 8 for a true entry level $499 (today's offer is an insult to anyone with any computer knowledge!!)
Long Live Steve Job and I hope he visits Tim Cook in his dreams to wake Tim up to the masses that need better access... (Tim, this is why Android is still around, offer an actual affordable, true lowend product for the poor!!)
And if a person is as impoverished as you seem to be suggesting, their last concern is a cheap computer.
I imagine many people came up like I did, without the money for a Mac. We built crappy PCs or bought them inexpensively from Gateway200. We developed some skill. We translated that skill to a career. And poof, we can afford Macs now. -
Apple's record $81.4 billion Q3 obliterates Street expectations
lkrupp said:fallenjt said:And AAPL after hour trading drops over 1%. What kind of WS bullshit is that?
I see nothing in this report to make me reconsider my long position in AAPL. Except that my Financial Advisor tells me I own too much AAPL. It's not my fault it has 20x-ed while the rest of my portfolio has plodded along at more or less average returns. Probably should rebalance my holdings one day, but my Spidey sense says today is not that day. -
Synology announces the DS1621xs+, a high-end network attached storage device
Full disclosure, I own an older Diskstation (DS1812+) and even though I am defending the Diskstation's lack of bandwidth, it is exactly that lack of bandwidth that has kept if from being a front-line storage device for my photo retouching workflow. It just isn't fast enough. It has worked nicely for stashing dormant project archives and it is a great host for my Plex and iTunes media.
I'm happy to see the 10GbE & SSD cache drives move down from the expensive Rackstation line to the more budget-friendly Diskstation line. I would love to use a NAS device for primary project storage, freeing my primary Mac workstation from hosting this storage. It would be easier to access project files using my MacBook Pro when I'm away from my desk, not to mention being able to remote into the Diskstation remotely.