maximara
About
- Username
- maximara
- Joined
- Visits
- 35
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 328
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 409
Reactions
-
Apple appeals ruling in Epic Games lawsuit, requests stay on App Store changes
9secondkox2 said:Their is no antitrust. No monopoly. No breaking of the law going on. How the previous judge went above their pay grade and basically legislated from the bench is beyond rational thought.Let’s see a judge on appeal who actually does their job snd simply rules based on right snd wrong according to the law.
To be fair to the Judge that one point Apple lost on seems to be due to California state law not federal law. I have no idea how well that part will hold up via appeal. -
Google claims EU ignored Apple in $5.1B antitrust appeal
Google must be desperate to pull this nonsense. Apple at best has had perhaps 35% of the EU marketshare while Googie, via android has nearly double that (67%) as a quick trip to statcounter will show. North America is about the only market where Apple and Google enjoy nearly equal marketshare. Everywhere else Apple is a second. -
Apple partially patches new macOS Finder zero-day vulnerability
netling said:chadbag said:indieshack said:
As a developer I find it difficult to comprehend that other variations weren't tested...Apple reportedly patched thefile://
but failed to block other iterations of the prefix likeFile://
orfIle://
, meaning would-be attackers can easily bypass the built-in safeguards. The tech giant also failed to assign the bug a CVE designation, according to Minchan. -
Civil rights groups worldwide ask Apple to drop CSAM plans
CheeseFreeze said:It’s too late now. They just proven they can build something that helps governments, so they’ll demand it now. What an utterly stupid move. The only solution is to INCREASE security by providing end-to-end encryption, regardless of territory. Which they won’t.Actually if you think about it, it is a brilliant move. Odds are this thing is based on complying with laws on the books (18 U.S. Code § 2258 and its four sub laws here in the US) allowing Apple to take a high moral ground on government efforts to open up their iPhones."But if we allow sideloading they will be able to bypass this measure. Think of the children that will be harmed!" and to their customers they will point to those very same laws and likely say "But the law effectively requires us to do this - to protect the children."Then they break out the popcorn and watch the political free-for-all. -
2022 Mac Pro said to use Intel Ice Lake Xeon W-3300 CPU
coolfactor said:What they need to figure out is blending x86 and ARM architectures together so you get the best of both worlds in one computer.
EDIT: Maximara has the same idea.
If I understand how they worked the old Mac286 and Mac86 NuBus coprocessor cards may be closer to what I am thinking of. "The Mac86 was an i8086-based card for the Mac SE, while the Mac286 was a higher performance i80286-based card for the Mac II." That may seem primitive as all get out but remember it was the late 1980s and you were effectively putting a whole PC into your Mac. The tech and license was sold to Orange Micro who could go on to make more powerful cards such as the OrangePC 440 5x86-120, 16MB PCI (PCI slots in a mac appeared with the Power Macintosh 9500 in June 1996) Orange Micro stopped making such cards in 2001 and stopped existing in 2004.