djsherly
About
- Username
- djsherly
- Joined
- Visits
- 89
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 406
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 1,031
Reactions
-
Apple event invite inspires wild speculation about 'iPhone 7' iris scanning, bokeh, more
-
Spotify growing even faster thanks to launch of Apple Music, VP says
lkrupp said:rogifan_new said:I don't get what one has to do with the other. I have a hard time believing there were all these people holding out on signing up for a streaming music service because Apple wasn't in the game yet. But I think this signals that Music isn't compelling enough yet to get people to ditch existing options.
Apple Music is like its keynote. A bit of a mess really. -
Samsung reports Q1 mobile profits just 24% of Apple's
-
iPhone sales fall to 51.2M, Apple earns $50.6B in revenue in disappointing March quarter
volcan said:rogifan_new said:
Um, Tim, Wall Street isn't buying your services narrative. Especially since you weren't spinning this narrative when hardware sales weren't missing estimates. Cook needs to find a better narrative fast.
Wall Street has been up recently but US consumer confidence is mostly flat to negative. The markets in nearly the entire rest of the world has been down especially Asia, Europe and also currencies with respect to the USD. I can see macroeconomic headwinds as a reasonable explanation for declining CE sales. Hopefully it is a temporary situation although I'm keeping my fingers crossed. Considering the miserable choices of US presidential candidates, things might get worse before they get better.
i bought a fully specced out MB Pro in late 2014 for around 2700 Aud, it went in for service and was replaced with its equivalent 6 months later. Minor spec bump but the new price is 3500aud. During that time the USD appreciated considerably against the Aussie.
I was happy to pull the trigger at 2700 but 3500 is something else.
Demand for Apple product is not inelastic. Price is important. -
Rumor: Control of user data railroaded 'Project Titan' talks between Apple and BMW, Daimler
vvswarup said:sog35 said:
Agree with this.
Car maintenance is such a pain in the azz. Belts, hoses, hot oils running, literal exposions in the engine, ect. Its a miracle that car companies have figured out how to make ICE run 100,000+ miles. With an electric car there is no oil changes, brakes last 2x longer, no belts, exhaust systems, muffllers, ect.
Theoretically an electric car should only be in the shop once a year to rotate the tires. And I bet there is a way to make rotating the tires a thing of the past also with software. No more waiting at the shop for the tech to figure out why your car won't start. With electric cars the car itself will tell you whats wrong.
I cannot imagine how software is going to "make rotating tires a thing of the past." People rotate their tires because after driving for a certain number of miles, the tires wear out. Instead of buying four brand-new tires, people get new tires for the wheels that are part of the drivetrain and move the worn out tires to the other two tires, e.g. if the car is front-wheel drive, people buy new tires for the two front wheels and move the worn out tires to the back. Rotating tires is due to mechanical wear and tear. There's no getting around that, unless one eliminates friction somehow.
Using the braking energy to charge the battery will cause less energy to be dissipated into brakes, lengthening their life.
Most at if not all electric only cars have motors which directly drive the wheels. No transmission per se.
rotating tyres could be minimised particularly in 4wd cars by adjusting the torque sent to each wheel. I'd wager it would still have to be done but maintenance would be reduced.