revenant

what would congress know about apple's policy towards privacy? they click "i agree" without reading anything else as well, let alone read any of the bills they pass.

I really enjoy reading how this went from speculation to more speculation, to top it off it was Samsung's fault for over investing--not apple who over ordered. then the fact came out that apple did pay hundreds of millions of dollars for not receiving what they ordered and was produced.

it is ok if apple made a mistake in projecting how much they might have needed. they do not need our armchair, devoid of any specifics on the contractual agreement defence. they are big boys and will sort this out themselves. our feelings about this article is insignificant to the facts we do not know about it. 

it would be VERY interesting to see if Samsung is allowed to sell those screens to anyone other phone maker who can use it, or are they contractually obligated to keep or destroy them.

um ... I thought PCs were bigger than apple. will they go after windows? cable companies? or just make cable companies utilities?

apple has a garden. a well kept garden. it is their garden. they built it, kept it, sustained it. if you want in, there is a fee--and apple will maintain your plot in the garden.

apple checks your code to keep their customers safe, and apple gives you the best advertising, search for your product, ratings for your product and the loads easier swift language for building your project. all for $99 and 30% cut. 

feel free to go back to C++ and pay a company to advertise your project and pay for server traffic for housing/distributing your app.

when we customers get tired of your busted ass apps and the malware that threatens to take over our privacy, we will rate your app and the advertising company and the distribution design as rubbish and will refuse to go down that road twice. let us know how good things are then.