dasanman69
About
- Username
- dasanman69
- Joined
- Visits
- 95
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 435
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 13,002
Reactions
-
Take a stand against the Obama/FBI anti-encryption charm offensive
I need to stop making sense? As for citations look at every (real) terrorist act committed. They kill people they hate or that represent something they hate, not people that throw baby showers for them.tallest skil said:
You need to stop doing this.dasanman69 said:It was not terrorism.
Citation fucking needed.
-
Take a stand against the Obama/FBI anti-encryption charm offensive
It was not terrorism. They were wannabe terrorists. Terrorists use planned attacks on institutions, strategic, and iconic places. They don't kill people they know. These killers were pathetic, misguided, and their attack was a knee jerk reaction to a workplace argument.apple ][ said:
It was terrorism, Islamic terrorism to be precise. They were ISIS supporters and they were dirty terrorists. I am sorry if you have a problem with reality and facts.stsk said:Daniel, please please please don't refer to the incident as terrorism, unless you refer to shooting up an office Christmas party as an act of terror. The only reason the DOJ uses that term is because the morons pee their pants every time someone in authority invokes the boogeyman "TERROR!" or "Muslim". The non-postal workers shooting up their workplace were NOT terrorists - they were wackos who happened to be Muslim. Don't fall into buying the Feeb's nonsense manipulative rhetoric. Anyone who uses the term terrorist to describe that incident is supporting the Feebs. Don't be that guy.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/05/us/san-bernardino-shooting/ -
Apple to pay $450M fine after US Supreme Court rejects e-book antitrust appeal
Because they're not taking a loss on every book they sell. It was always only a select few.sog35 said:The amount of jobs and small companies Amazon has ruined is mind blowing.
Makes me sick that a company like Amazon can undercut the competition by selling goods below cost.
Amazon stays afloat because they pay most of their executives with stock options instead of cash. And Wall Street keeps inflating Amazon stock, so they are part of the scam also.
How is selling goods below cost NOT anti-competitive? How can other companies compete if Amazon is willing to take losses on every book they sell?
-
San Bernardino shooter's iPhone may hold evidence of 'dormant cyber pathogen,' DA says
A smartphone pandemic.
-
Apple makes room for 500 employees in new San Francisco office
Thanks. Anytime I try to paste a link the cursor moves into the previous post and I can't get it out. I've given up trying to do it anymore.Soli said:
Just paste the URL and it will automatically become a hyperlink.dasanman69 said:Search Justin Keller. I'd post the link but this new software makes it almost impossible to do so.
