dasanman69

About

Username
dasanman69
Joined
Visits
94
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
435
Badges
1
Posts
13,002

Reactions

640Like21Informative

  • Walmart may challenge Apple, Netflix & others with new streaming service

    dasanman69dasanman69
    nunzy said:
    Once Apple releases it's content, several studios will go up for sale. How could they compete?
    On the other platforms 
    nunzy

  • Gary Vaynerchuk slams Apple for 'Planet of the Apps' marketing flop

    dasanman69dasanman69
    nunzy said:
     Maybe he should maybe he should look in the mirror to see where the blame lies. He is biting the hand that feeds him. Apple should cancel the show and fire him.
    He's doing great without Apple. 
    nunzy

  • Apple Music overtakes Spotify in U.S. subscriber counts

    dasanman69dasanman69
    nunzy said:
    dasanman69 said:
    andrewj5790 said:
    rogifan_new said:
    matrix077 said:
    This’s gonna be fun. 

    Spotify boasting about its user is not different than Google boasting about Android activations 8 years ago. Quantity not quality. 
    Spotify isn’t a quality service? Based on what?

    Considering AM is the default music app on every iOS device it would be embarrassing for Apple if it didn’t take over Spotify.
    I don’t want to speak for the OP but I don’t think he was comparing the services in question but the subscribers to those services. iPhone users being more willing to spend money, etc. I think it’s a fair point. Being cross platform isn’t all that great of an advantage when a high percentage of the folks on the other platforms don’t spend money. 
    If true then why did Apple go cross platform with their music? 
    Apple did it to increase their bottom line. To make higher profits. The same reason they do anything. And everything.

    The answer is always the same. They did it to increase total profits.
    According to the poster I replied to going cross platform isn't all that great. I appreciate your input but I wanted his/her answer. 
    nunzy

  • Startup seeks $200,000 from Apple over 'stolen' Shortcuts app icon

    dasanman69dasanman69
    StrangeDays said:
    dasanman69 said:
    LukeCage said:
    Apple's shortcut icon looks nothing like shifts icon, or maybe i'm missing something 
    You're missing impartiality 
    You’re missing the ability to post without explicitly bolding your entire message....every...single..time. 
    And I've explained why I have to. It's the only way my text stays within my comment space. If I don't write in bold the cursor jumps in the previous comment's window. 
    gatorguy

  • Samsung owes Apple $539M for infringing on iPhone patents, jury finds

    dasanman69dasanman69
    AND HERE’S WHAT NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT...

    This was a trial from 2012, covering only Samsung handset models sold in the United States up to that point.  While Samsung may have quickly changed the snap-back behavior and swipe-to-unlock to avoid infringing in future models, it doesn’t appear they changed, or even could have changed, their phones’ overall designs to avoid continuing to infringe the design patents that made up the vast majority of the damages in this case.  And so it’s possible Apple could seek to add later models to this verdict, which would then potentially amount to a multiple of the current damages awards given the way the overall smartphone market, and Samsung’s unit volumes, expanded in the years since 2012.  Food for thought. 
    Apple lost a design patent claim in this lawsuit against Samsung's tablet. I think the ship has sailed on trying to sue for a design patent violation. 
    williamlondon