realistic

crowley said:

9secondkox2 said:

Beats said:

gc_uk said:

Nobody seems to understand what a monopoly is. Just because there are other phones doesn’t mean Apple isn’t engaging in a monopoly. 

Wal-Mart has a monopoly on Wal-Mart. That doesn’t mean Coca Cola  has the right to change their rules. 

That’s not a monopoly. 

A thing cannot monopolize itself. It must monopolize a market. 

Apple has zero monopoly anywhere on any market. 

Case closed. 

There is a market for iOS apps, iOS apps are not exclusively owned or created by Apple and yet Apple runs the only store.  Case reopened.

Apple does not control a majority of the mobile marketplace. so case closed. A monopoly has to have   control a given market. Ford, HP, GM...  like Apple controls the market for their given products but none are a monopoly.

I don't know about anyone else but i don't really talk well under water.

“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” ― Benjamin Franklin,

It would be nice to see the Pittsburg USA facility continue to manufacture this aluminum versus building a new plant in Quebec.

I can't understand how any government can change tax laws, or any law for that matter, and make those laws retroactive.