tylersdad

About

Username
tylersdad
Joined
Visits
58
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
2,020
Badges
2
Posts
310
  • Apple & EU slammed for dangerous child abuse imagery scanning plans

    How Apple didn’t see these privacy and security threats to their users and to society is mind boggling. 
    Plenty of people on Apple Insider didn't see this as a privacy or security threat. 

    Absolutely mind boggling. 
    entropyscat52elijahgplanetary pauldarkvadermuthuk_vanalingam
  • Apple shareholder urges action on CSAM videos

    This guy should stay in his lane and the let real privacy experts have their say. 

    Real privacy experts are nearly universally against Apple’s proposed implementation of CSAM. 
    elijahgbaconstangkmobergbyronlmuthuk_vanalingambluefire1
  • Apple making display repairs harder on iPhone 13 Pro is a step too far

    The lengths to which people will go to excuse anti-consumer behavior by Apple is stunning. 
    muthuk_vanalingamwilliamlondoncuriousrun8haikuspscooter63elijahgbeowulfschmidtjony0
  • Apple's 'loss' is the best result for users, developers, Apple, and Epic

    tylersdad said:
    I believe this can be appealed, no? We may not have heard the end of this. But it's a good ruling that at least shuts down the ridiculous 'monopoly' argument. For now...
    I don't see how claims of the App Store being a monopoly are ridiculous. If I own an iPhone, I have one place and one place only to buy the apps for my phone: the App Store. Can I buy a phone from a different manufacturer? Sure. But that was the case years ago as well when Microsoft was forced to remove Internet Explorer from Windows because their position in the market essentially gave them an unfair advantage in the browser wars. People had the opportunity to buy Linux and Apple machines. There were alternative operating systems for those who didn't want Internet Explorer, but EU regulators still made MS remove IE from Windows. 
    If you shop at Walmart - do you not buy what Walmart stocks? If you shop at Target, do you have a choice to buy what Walmart stocks if Target doesn't stock it? If you buy an X-box, do you install Playstation games? If you buy an X-box, where do you download games from? If you have a Ford do you take it to a BMW dealer to repair? Do you buy Ford parts? I think it's more complicated than you make it out to be. And at the root of this is- buy a different device. Buy a windows PC or an Android or any of the knock-offs from Android. I buy the iPhone exactly for the reason you seem to be mad about. I think the Mac is a similar thing. If you want total control to add RGB lights to your desktop, don't buy a Mac. So I can't really agree with the 'Monopoly' stance, and the judge didn't either BTW. The digital world is different. Crypto currencies don't act like paper money either. People have the right to buy a different device and MOST DO. iPhones are far, far, far down the list of most used mobile devices and the platform has nowhere near the numbers of Android. Also, our phones are HUGE security risks now. It's not comparable to almost any digital device in history. Security has to drive a huge part of how we use it and how it functions. I have 80 year old parents who use iPhones, I don't want more avenues for the BS methods used to get info and gain access from their devices. Anyway, I get your instinct to say 'I buy it and I can't do exactly what I want. And that's not fair.' But I think it's not as binary as that. It's a weird mix of older consumer experiences and an entirely new type of platform with risks and particular issues.
    It's not complicated in the least. I can CHOOSE where I shop. I can shop at Walmart and buy good from Walmart. I can shop at Target and buy goods at Target. I can even buy stuff from Amazon, if I don't mind waiting a few days. 

    Where can I go to buy apps for my iPhone if not the App Store? 
    muthuk_vanalingam
  • Pay up or get out: Apple's options for South Korea's App Store law

    killroy said:
    tylersdad said:
    killroy said:
    tylersdad said:
    killroy said:
    tylersdad said:
    rob53 said:
    Exciting times. I've been arguing for this for years and that's why so many people hate me on this forum.
    So you believe a developer has every right in the world to post their apps for free on the Apple App Store? Give me one legitimate reason why Apple should be required to host these apps for free. Apple doesn't charge for free apps but could start doing that if they wanted to. Apple could also start charging developers to even put their apps on the Apple App Store and if these stupid laws pass, I'm all for Apple doing that. There's no way anyone could force Apple to host things on their servers for free. It would be like me hosting your email server on my hardware, which I maintain, for free. Get a grip, I'd never do that and I doubt any company would do that. This shows how stupid these laws are.

    Of course, if you want to have your own payment system, then be prepared for Apple to start charging you a hosting fee for every download and install of that app. That's only fair isn't it?
    No. As a developer, I feel I should not be limited to Apple's way of distributing apps to my users. 

    It's as simple as that. I won't use their infrastructure and they won't get any money from me (other than my developers subscription). 

    You well pay for use of their server. And you well be kicked off if your app has malware.
    Why would I use their server? My customers are able to download apps from my website and install them. 

    We are talking about iOS app store. Not the Mac app store.
    What difference does that make? An app is an app. An iPhone or an iPad is just another type of computer. 
    iPhone or an iPad apps are not on the MAC app store also. Mac apps are Pro apps and are not all down loaded from the Mac app store.
    You're missing the point. Apps are just apps. Regardless of the platform they run on. There's nothing special about a Mac or Windows app in comparison to an iPhone or iPad app. There is no technical reason for me to not be able to distribute iPhone or iPad apps directly to my customers. Apple only forces me to use the App Store so that they can take 30% of my sales...ostensibly to pay for the infrastructure needed to support the app store. But I only need to use their infrastructure because they're FORCING me to use their infrastructure. I'd prefer to NOT use it. 
    avon b7elijahg