muppetry

About

Username
muppetry
Joined
Visits
42
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
259
Badges
1
Posts
3,331
  • Conservative group to attack Apple over 'hypocrisy' on religious freedom during shareholder meeting

    puppetry said:
    Can you provide a single example of mainstream liberal thinking imposing liberal values on how others live their lives? Just one please.
    Do you want attempts or things to fruition? Because attempts are just as valid, since they prove what liberals believe.

    Do you want an example of the “ban it because I don’t like it” ethic?

    Trans fats, soda, guns (unconstitutional), the Pledge of Allegiance, the word ‘welfare’, dolls, entire political parties, masculinity (the concept itself), marriage, diversity, etc.

    Or maybe “accept it because you’re bigoted otherwise”?

    Homosexuality, marijuana, amnesty, abortion, transsexuality, federalization (because liberals don’t only exist in America), etc.

    Here’s the basic issue.

    Conservatism is fundamentally predicated on the belief that there is a single, objective reality that is intelligible (read: can be understood). This, in turn, leads one to adopt specific codes of conduct and behaviors that we call a moral core.

    Leftist thought is fundamentally predicated on the belief that everything is subjective and nothing is objectively true or capable of being understood. This, in turn, leads one to adopt a fluid and contradictory moral relativism.

    Leftists often attack conservatives for being hypocritical. Indeed, conservatives can be very hypocritical. Take, for example, anti-drug politicians who abuse alcohol, or so called “free market capitalists” that give subsidies to oil companies. They get attacked for this stuff all the time, and I’d say you’re right to call them hypocrites.

    Here’s the kicker: a moral relativist cannot be a hypocrite, because there is no situation where he’s objectively in the wrong, even when he is acting in disagreement with his own “morals.” You can’t call someone a moral hypocrite if they functionally have no morals. So when Hillary Clinton professes to be a feminist while taking donations from regimes that abuse women, or Obama professes to be transparent while obsessing over secrecy, or Michael Moore makes a movie trashing capitalism while making cash hand over fist off it, there’s no problem for them. It’s all relative. They don’t care.

    The second big thing–and this is their most beloved tactic–is this: They accuse you of what they are doing to you. Just meditate on that sentence and you’ll start to see it everywhere.
    So out of all that, you listed two or three things where you assert liberal thinking is attempting to define how you live - reducing the consumption of trans fats, soda, and something about guns.

    Presumably trying to reduce the public consumption of alcohol and tobacco should also be in there by your reasoning? How about wearing seat belts? How about safety regulations in general? Are those all part of a liberal conspiracy to wreck your life? Or is that responsible government? Where do you draw the line? 

    What's your point about guns? Are you still trying to peddle the notion that Obama wants to take them all? Are the Republicans who espouse background checks virtually identical to the proposals that have been rejected multiple times closet leftists?

    Leftist thought is fundamentally predicated on the belief that everything is subjective and nothing is objectively true or capable of being understood.

    It's not possible to have a reasoned discussion when your posts contain this kind of uneductaed BS. Where on earth do you get this nonsense from?

    bancho
  • Conservative group to attack Apple over 'hypocrisy' on religious freedom during shareholder meeting

    muppetry said:
    Liberals, in general, don't want to tell you how to live your life.
    That’s why they support totalitarian government, of course. And why only their social beliefs are “acceptable”.

    Soli said: Which is why who we know as liberals are actually bigots.
    Liberals fail to comprehend that. They project this delusion onto others, as shown by all of their discourse.
    The hell is this coming from?
    Two things. Actually four.

    Tolerance is the virtue of the man without conviction.

    – G. K. Chesterton

    A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in an argument.

    – Robert Frost

    Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred.

    – Jacques Barzun

    Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

    – C. S. Lewis

    You can post arbitrary opposing assertions all you like, but your characterizations are still completely reversed from reality. Let me pose a question instead. Can you provide a single example of mainstream liberal thinking imposing liberal values on how others live their lives? Just one please.
    bancho
  • Conservative group to attack Apple over 'hypocrisy' on religious freedom during shareholder meeting

    Soli said:
    So... every liberal, then. “Our way or the hourghway” is bigotry.
    I don't get this argument. Liberals, in general, don't want to tell you how to live your life. They just don't want you to tell others how to live their lives. This is classic projection.
    dasanman69bancho
  • In new court filing, Apple cites 9 other cases in which FBI asserted the All Writs Act

    prox said:
    I replied to everyone on this board buy all my comments are being deleted. Please Google search Apple China and you will find your answers.
    No - your posts are still there, on page one, and still don't support your assertion.
    magman1979icoco3caliration albanchojbdragondiplicationai46tdknoxsteveh
  • In new court filing, Apple cites 9 other cases in which FBI asserted the All Writs Act

    roake said:
    muppetry said:
    If that is as it appears to be, then the FBI's credibility score just lost a good few points.
    I didn't realize that they still had any points left to lose.
    I believe the score can go negative.
    icoco3jbdragonai46palomine