muppetry

cgWerks said:

muppetry said:
Now you sound like you have descended into pseudo-science so it's difficult to address your question in any meaningful way. Are you suggesting that the established understanding of the interaction of RF with matter is incorrect? It's pretty basic physics. And which advances in our scientific understanding are you referring to? You don't write like a scientist of any flavor, so are you qualified to assess what has and has not been taken into account? 

Not pseudo-science, modern science... epigenetics.
Not incorrect, but incomplete.
That DNA has far more than one function (i.e.: you don't have to damage the DNA to impact what proteins are produced).