Apple, major labels discuss plans for free streaming music service
According to multiple music industry sources, Apple execs have met with the four major music labels about a possible free-of-charge music streaming service.
According to multiple sources in the music industry, Apple has been shopping around the idea of a streaming music service that would allow users the ability to back up and access their music from any Internet-connected device. CNET writes that Apple sees the cloud-based streaming feature as a "value add" that could help to stimulate music download sales.
All indications point to the service being up and running as soon as spring of this year.
On Tuesday, Michael Robertson, 12-year veteran of the digital music business and former CEO of MP3.com predicted that a cloud-based version of iTunes would soon be a reality:
"An upcoming major revision of iTunes will copy each user's catalog to the net making it available from any browser or net connected ipod/touch/tablet," he wrote.
"The Lala upload technology will be bundled into a future iTunes upgrade which will automatically be installed for the 100+ million iTunes users with a simple 'An upgrade is available?' notification dialog box."
"After installation iTunes will push in the background their entire media library to their personal mobile iTunes area. Once loaded, users will be able to navigate and play their music, videos and playlists from their personal URL using a browser based iTunes experience."
In December, Apple purchased music streaming service Lala for $85 million. It is believed that Apple will use the knowledge and technology gained from this acquisition in order to make the streaming music service a reality.
Apple has already leveraged some degree of Lala's streaming tech, with 30-second song samples being available on the iTunes Preview website, allowing users to view and listen to content available from the service without opening iTunes.
CNET writes that it is unlikely but not impossible that Apple will include the streaming service in their upcoming January 27 press event. It is widely believed however, that Apple will introduce both its new tablet device along with iPhone OS 4.0.
According to multiple sources in the music industry, Apple has been shopping around the idea of a streaming music service that would allow users the ability to back up and access their music from any Internet-connected device. CNET writes that Apple sees the cloud-based streaming feature as a "value add" that could help to stimulate music download sales.
All indications point to the service being up and running as soon as spring of this year.
On Tuesday, Michael Robertson, 12-year veteran of the digital music business and former CEO of MP3.com predicted that a cloud-based version of iTunes would soon be a reality:
"An upcoming major revision of iTunes will copy each user's catalog to the net making it available from any browser or net connected ipod/touch/tablet," he wrote.
"The Lala upload technology will be bundled into a future iTunes upgrade which will automatically be installed for the 100+ million iTunes users with a simple 'An upgrade is available?' notification dialog box."
"After installation iTunes will push in the background their entire media library to their personal mobile iTunes area. Once loaded, users will be able to navigate and play their music, videos and playlists from their personal URL using a browser based iTunes experience."
In December, Apple purchased music streaming service Lala for $85 million. It is believed that Apple will use the knowledge and technology gained from this acquisition in order to make the streaming music service a reality.
Apple has already leveraged some degree of Lala's streaming tech, with 30-second song samples being available on the iTunes Preview website, allowing users to view and listen to content available from the service without opening iTunes.
CNET writes that it is unlikely but not impossible that Apple will include the streaming service in their upcoming January 27 press event. It is widely believed however, that Apple will introduce both its new tablet device along with iPhone OS 4.0.
Comments
After installation iTunes will push in the background their entire media library to their personal mobile iTunes area.
Arrgh. Another Lala article, another ambiguous statement about streaming an 'entire library' from the cloud. Does this include music outside of the tracks one buys from iTMS (such as ripped CDs)?
Multiple music industry sources tell CNET that Apple execs have met with the four major music labels about a possible free-of-charge music streaming service.
"After installation iTunes will push in the background their entire media library to their personal mobile iTunes area. Once loaded, users will be able to navigate and play their music, videos and playlists from their personal URL using a browser based iTunes experience."
[ View this article at AppleInsider.com ]
More like Apple bundles this into MobileMe to allow paying members access to their music collection over the web, either streaming from their home device (TimeCapsule/AppleTV) or from their MobileMe accounts online. I would LOVE to have this functionality so that I don't have to load down my laptop and iPhone with my entire music collection. Most everywhere I go has a decent Internet connection, and my connection at home uploads at 5Mbps sustained, sufficient enough to stream music anywhere I want over the web.
But I don't see how or why Apple would invest the amount of money it would need to to store hundreds of millions of users' iTunes collections without being able to monetize it somehow, or at least generate some kind of incremental revenue or market share by doing so. The feature is nice, but I don't see how it improves their market position, so why spend the $$$ to make it free. This is Apple, not Google.
CNET writes that Apple sees the cloud-based streaming feature as a "value add" that could help to stimulate music download sales.
What do the Music Labels (with 5 RIAA lawyers in top spots in the US Justice Dept.) gets out of this deal so Apple can eliminate superdrives and hard drives out of it's devices and sell us less machine with a high monthly subscription in order to access our purchased content?
My home Internet Access is faster than I get currently for streaming a lousy 30 second song. I get my full iTunes library and it's faster and free to stream it from my home machine.
This has already been done by numerous apps. Apple and AI are really reaching if this is going to be introduced as "innovative" for the announcement tomorrow.
Been there done that and it's already Free and faster than Apple can deliver.
I feel mixed about this. The advantages:
-the service is free
-the service will stream the music you already own if iTunes has it
the disadvantages:
-piracy will allow users to upload any content they wish without paying for it
-will not allow users to find new music because it's just the content you own
I would rather have the streaming service just because I own the music that has influenced me. I would be willing to pay for a subscription service so I can find new music without feeling I'm taking a risk on owning it.
Tha being said I understand both sides of the argument.
This has been available from a many Apps for the iPhone for at least the last year.
My home Internet Access is faster than I get currently for streaming a lousy 30 second song.
This has already been done by numerous apps. Apple and AI are really reaching if this is going to be conidered "inovative" for the announcement tomorrow.
Been there done that and it's already Free and faster than Apple can deliver.
I have Simply Media as well and there is always problems with either updating your library or it takes too long to refresh your library on the iPhone. This way is much quicker through iTunes.
As I said before, all of this streaming is free so you are not relying on your home upload connection to listen to your content.
I have Simply Media as well and there is always problems with either updating your library or it takes too long to refresh your library on the iPhone. This way is much quicker through iTunes.
As I said before, all of this streaming is free so you are not relying on your home upload connection to listen to your content.
I have the PC version and very fast home Internet connection and by the way, if you have the App then you know it's Symplify Media. It isn't free now but was when I downloaded it. So I guess I get a bonus for being a fan from the beginning.
I know and trust my home Internet site and have been MORE than happy with Symplify Media.
If your home connection is that bad then you won't have any more success with Apple's offering until they open their farm (if that's what it's for). To download a 30 second sample from iTunes takes twice as long as Symplify Media.
Sucks it costs $7.99 now but it's more than worth the cost if you have fast home Internet access.
More like Apple bundles this into MobileMe to allow paying members access to their music collection over the web, either streaming from their home device (TimeCapsule/AppleTV) or from their MobileMe accounts online. I would LOVE to have this functionality so that I don't have to load down my laptop and iPhone with my entire music collection. Most everywhere I go has a decent Internet connection, and my connection at home uploads at 5Mbps sustained, sufficient enough to stream music anywhere I want over the web.
hear, hear! kinda like simplifymedia only better. way better.
hear, hear! kinda like simplifymedia only better. way better.
And you're saying way better for a product that is rumored and Apple's cloud service other than MobileVista has been a failure.
I'll keep my money on Simplify Media until I see an actual product and hear from NON Apple Fanatics a fair and unbiased opinion of the yet feature that doesn't exist other than rumors.
What do the Music Labels (with 5 RIAA lawyers in top spots in the US Justice Dept.) gets out of this deal so Apple can eliminate superdrives and hard drives out of it's devices and sell us less machine with a high monthly subscription in order to access our purchased content?
How is it you always come to some bizarre conclusion? Copying your catalogue doesn’t mean storing your music files to the cloud and then deleting your local library. It means copying a “list” of your library that you can access if you aren’t with your local content.
What content is streamable and if there is an extra fee are the questions you should be asking.
Again, YOUR LOCAL CONTENT IS NOT GOING TO BE REMOVED!
I have the PC version and very fast home Internet connection and by the way, if you have the App then you know it's Symplify Media. It isn't free now but was when I downloaded it. So I guess I get a bonus for being a fan from the beginning.
I know and trust my home Internet site and have been MORE than happy with Symplify Media.
If your home connection is that bad then you won't have any more success with Apple's offering until they open their farm (if that's what it's for). To download a 30 second sample from iTunes takes twice as long as Symplify Media.
Sucks it costs $7.99 now but it's more than worth the cost if you have fast home Internet access.
I live in NY and get 20Mbps from FIOS. I have one of the best Internet connections in the country. That is not the point. From dealing with Simplify Media from the beginning I have seen many an issue with them especially recently. It also takes awhile to refresh your library if you have some new music that has been added or subscribe to many podcasts as I do. Info living on iTunes servers is faster. BTW it does not take twice as long unless you have a really slow data connection. There is no constant go-between you and iTunes like Simplify.
I trust my internet connection but I trust iTunes more than Simplify Media. iTunes is much faster and stable on the iPhone. This not only includes audio but video as well which Simplify does not offer.
And you're saying way better for a product that is rumored and Apple's cloud service other than MobileVista has been a failure.
I'll keep my money on Simplify Media until I see an actual product and hear from NON Apple Fanatics a fair and unbiased opinion of the yet feature that doesn't exist other than rumors.
You're dealing with an Apple fan but not a fanatic. I am one who believes the tablet won't be a huge hit. That doesn't mean that Apple doesn't have more to offer than Simplify. From my own experiences iTunes is faster than Simplify. I'm also one of the people who didn't bitch and moan when Simplify charged an upgrade price. I paid.
RIGHT NOW whatever sits on your iDisk is also on your Mac locally. Your data is in the Cloud, but it also sits on youur hard drive, and is synced automatically.
Does anyone here (the naysayers) acutally USE iDIsk and MobileMe?? This is pretty basic knowledge. There's really no cause for complaint.
Jeez . . .
Where's the Macbook update love?
It was recently updated. It?s the pro Macs that need the love.
I have the PC version and very fast home Internet connection and by the way, if you have the App then you know it's Symplify Media. It isn't free now but was when I downloaded it. So I guess I get a bonus for being a fan from the beginning.
You must have renamed your copy then. Mine is called Simplify Media.
It works well and I love it, but I have to agree with str - if I had so much as a single track to my collection, Simplify can sometimes take five minutes on my iPhone with the subsequent launch to update my library. The server component often takes up a ridiculous amount of resources as well, although I admit it's running on a fairly low-end machine: my old G4 Mac Mini has been turned into a media server. That said, it really shouldn't take 40% of my CPU to monitor my iTunes library.
Sucks it costs $7.99 now but it's more than worth the cost if you have fast home Internet access.
It's also cheaper than upgrading your device to one with more memory
RIGHT NOW whatever sits on your iDisk is also on your Mac locally. Your data is in the Cloud, but it also sits on youur hard drive, and is synced automatically.
Not by default. I believe I had to configure (through the MobileMe pref panel) for my MBP to keep a local copy of my iDisk. But I'm picking nits - it's easy enough to have your iDisk sync with your local disk.
Is anyone as turned off by the cloud concept as I am? I'm sure many would find it useful, but for myself, I prefer to keep my data local, and totally under my control.
I agree with you. I don't think people are going to jump on the cloud business too much, especially the prices the are trying to charge.
A hard drive lasts years for $80 for 500Gb, yet a online service costs $20 or so a month, don't pay and they lock your content. Plus it can be snooped in on too.
And you can't boot from a online cloud, like you can from a clone of a boot drive.
Is anyone as turned off by the cloud concept as I am? I'm sure many would find it useful, but for myself, I prefer to keep my data local, and totally under my control.
Why exactly are you turned off by it? You do know that your data is stored locally and never leaves your machine and devices? This would be a free or paid for service that offers an additional option to access your audio.
Not by default. I believe I had to configure (through the MobileMe pref panel) for my MBP to keep a local copy of my iDisk. But I'm picking nits - it's easy enough to have your iDisk sync with your local disk.
You?re correct that it?s an option you turn on in the MM preference pane, but his point is sound: cloud and local storage are NOT mutually exclusive storage methods.