They are all slightly different. Do you like them? Which one is the best? For your information, they are Acura Integras w/ custom headlights and body kits.
I guess I'd say all those cars are "trying too hard." Sadly, I'd say a stock Integra is more attractive (and cheaper and more practical) than any of them.
And a Jag definitely wins the day over all of 'em! G4Dude, no offense, but I can't see the appeal in these cars, for a guy who already has a Jag.
<strong>I guess I'd say all those cars are "trying too hard." Sadly, I'd say a stock Integra is more attractive (and cheaper and more practical) than any of them.
And a Jag definitely wins the day over all of 'em! G4Dude, no offense, but I can't see the appeal in these cars, for a guy who already has a Jag.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I think the front end of the stock integra is **** personally. These would toast my jag. They are hella fast. Probably when I go to college and need somewhat reliable transportation, I'll get an Integra, until then, Jag
I always wondered... how the heck do those stupid riced-up cars get around town anyways? They look too low to clear a speedbump-- and SoCal seems to be full of those...
I have no idea what an Acura Integra is. Is it American, or is it from Korea, or Japan? Is it another name for a car sold here in the UK/Europe? Also, as they must be two-a-penny over there, what do you think of a Chrysler Neon? They are incredibly good value here - 2.0litre, automatic, leather, CDplayer, traction control, good safety, etc for only 13000 pounds.
I have no idea what an Acura Integra is. Is it American, or is it from Korea, or Japan? Is it another name for a car sold here in the UK/Europe? Also, as they must be two-a-penny over there, what do you think of a Chrysler Neon? They are incredibly good value here - 2.0litre, automatic, leather, CDplayer, traction control, good safety, etc for only 13000 pounds.
David</strong><hr></blockquote>
In the USA, the higher priced Hondas are badged as Acura, this is only in the US though. As for the DODGE Neon, I like that car a lot. The headlights are kind of ugly but it is a good car and next years SRT-4 model is really fast. "two-a-penny?" is that the same as a dime-a-dozen?
Unless every single one of those abominations are turbocharged with a FMIC, there is no reason to stick the huge "mouth" on the front. And if they're not turbocharged then they are all slow as hell. If I had to choose, it would have to be the white one, sans the stupid stickers.
If you are intent on buying something like this, please stay away from "bling bling" rims and garish stickers advertising modifications that you do not possess. If you want to go fast, then buy a fast car. Don't try to make something look fast when it is not.
As for the DODGE Neon, I like that car a lot. The headlights are kind of ugly but it is a good car and next years SRT-4 model is really fast. "two-a-penny?" is that the same as a dime-a-dozen?
G4Dude - The Neon is a Chrysler here in Europe - and yes, two a penny is a dime a dozen. Also, is Dodge or Chrysler a more prestige marque in the USA - Chrysler only sell the neon, pt cruiser, voyager and viper in the UK, so Chrysler badge them all.
These cars are not beautifull, especially t he huge mouth in the front, which is ugly. In generally i hate aeredynamics appendice on a car. Look at a Ferrari, great aerodynamic but not wing at the back : strictely forbidden by Ferrari for consumers cars.
If the design of a car is perfect is does not need customization.
<strong>These cars are not beautifull, especially t he huge mouth in the front, which is ugly. In generally i hate aeredynamics appendice on a car. Look at a Ferrari, great aerodynamic but not wing at the back : strictely forbidden by Ferrari for consumers cars.
If the design of a car is perfect is does not need customization.</strong><hr></blockquote>
If I had to choose one Id say the last oen, the silver one. Why? I like silver, and I hate having logos on my car. Also I cant stand all the lights, so the blacks out.
Comments
<strong>Giant wing on the back of a street car == extremely lame.</strong><hr></blockquote>
so you like the white one then?
And a Jag definitely wins the day over all of 'em! G4Dude, no offense, but I can't see the appeal in these cars, for a guy who already has a Jag.
<strong>I guess I'd say all those cars are "trying too hard." Sadly, I'd say a stock Integra is more attractive (and cheaper and more practical) than any of them.
And a Jag definitely wins the day over all of 'em! G4Dude, no offense, but I can't see the appeal in these cars, for a guy who already has a Jag.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I think the front end of the stock integra is **** personally. These would toast my jag. They are hella fast. Probably when I go to college and need somewhat reliable transportation, I'll get an Integra, until then, Jag
I have no idea what an Acura Integra is. Is it American, or is it from Korea, or Japan? Is it another name for a car sold here in the UK/Europe? Also, as they must be two-a-penny over there, what do you think of a Chrysler Neon? They are incredibly good value here - 2.0litre, automatic, leather, CDplayer, traction control, good safety, etc for only 13000 pounds.
David
<strong>Hi,
I have no idea what an Acura Integra is. Is it American, or is it from Korea, or Japan? Is it another name for a car sold here in the UK/Europe? Also, as they must be two-a-penny over there, what do you think of a Chrysler Neon? They are incredibly good value here - 2.0litre, automatic, leather, CDplayer, traction control, good safety, etc for only 13000 pounds.
David</strong><hr></blockquote>
In the USA, the higher priced Hondas are badged as Acura, this is only in the US though. As for the DODGE Neon, I like that car a lot. The headlights are kind of ugly but it is a good car and next years SRT-4 model is really fast. "two-a-penny?" is that the same as a dime-a-dozen?
[ 03-04-2002: Message edited by: G4Dude ]</p>
If you are intent on buying something like this, please stay away from "bling bling" rims and garish stickers advertising modifications that you do not possess. If you want to go fast, then buy a fast car. Don't try to make something look fast when it is not.
[edit]
That's a big "nay" from groverat.
[ 03-04-2002: Message edited by: groverat ]</p>
<strong>
As for the DODGE Neon, I like that car a lot. The headlights are kind of ugly but it is a good car and next years SRT-4 model is really fast. "two-a-penny?" is that the same as a dime-a-dozen?
[ 03-04-2002: Message edited by: G4Dude ]</strong><hr></blockquote>
G4Dude - The Neon is a Chrysler here in Europe - and yes, two a penny is a dime a dozen. Also, is Dodge or Chrysler a more prestige marque in the USA - Chrysler only sell the neon, pt cruiser, voyager and viper in the UK, so Chrysler badge them all.
Thanks,
David
If the design of a car is perfect is does not need customization.
<strong>These cars are not beautifull, especially t he huge mouth in the front, which is ugly. In generally i hate aeredynamics appendice on a car. Look at a Ferrari, great aerodynamic but not wing at the back : strictely forbidden by Ferrari for consumers cars.
If the design of a car is perfect is does not need customization.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I could not put it better myself!
Those cars are just... *shudder*
If I had to choose one Id say the last oen, the silver one. Why? I like silver, and I hate having logos on my car. Also I cant stand all the lights, so the blacks out.