This assessment strikes me as unduly pessimistic. The graph clearly shows a net increase in desktop sales,
I can't figure out what it's supposed to show... the timeline (x axis) progresses from Q106 (presumably first quarter 2006) followed by Q406, Q307, Q208, Q109, Q409, Q310, Q201... ?
The last entry is probably meant to be Q2 2010 but why invert the quarters? What happened to FY 2008, or quarters 2 and 3 of 2009, or Q1 and 4 of 2010? Is the first entry supposed to be Q1 2006 or 2005?
These data are so screwed up no conclusions can be drawn, yet many respondents here have done exactly that.
Comments
This assessment strikes me as unduly pessimistic. The graph clearly shows a net increase in desktop sales,
I can't figure out what it's supposed to show... the timeline (x axis) progresses from Q106 (presumably first quarter 2006) followed by Q406, Q307, Q208, Q109, Q409, Q310, Q201... ?
The last entry is probably meant to be Q2 2010 but why invert the quarters? What happened to FY 2008, or quarters 2 and 3 of 2009, or Q1 and 4 of 2010? Is the first entry supposed to be Q1 2006 or 2005?
These data are so screwed up no conclusions can be drawn, yet many respondents here have done exactly that.
Read AAPL's annual reports - it's all there.
Someone just got their 5yo account banned.
Not really..... just got detention for 10 days, and my previous post has obviously been altered. Everyone is so sensitive.