Al Gore will not run for President in 2004

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
«13

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 42
    applenutapplenut Posts: 5,768member
    thank God



    he would have never won. now at least the democrats may have a chance
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 42
    I'm equally stunned. He would have had an excellent chance at winning.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 42
    brbr Posts: 8,395member
    [quote]Originally posted by ShawnPatrickJoyce:

    <strong>I'm equally stunned. He would have had an excellent chance at winning. </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Not during the conveniently timed war.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 42
    I agree, but his chances would have been higher than any other candidate. I also believe that he may have been able to shed light on Bush's war mongering being that he was an outsider for so long after he lost the presidency.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 42
    ....The door just cracked open a bit for Gary Condit's presidential bid....
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 42
    Wow.... Interesting - though from my poor understanding of US politics seems like a good thing for Democrats...



    So who do you think will/want to see become the Democrat's candidate?



    Hilary Clinton

    Joe Lieberman

    Howard Dean

    John Kerry

    Tom Daschle

    Dick Gephardt

    John Edwards.



    Fascinating stuff me thinks - US politics..........
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 42
    Not Hillary Clinton. The thinking is now that the 2008 Democratic Nomination would be set up to lose for Hillary Clinton's 2008 run.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 42
    I dunno, he may want to recount his reasons for not running... or maybe recount the number of times he said "That's not fair" or maybe recount the number of post election blunders he made. Maybe he can recount his way back to Tennessee to his new home and STAY there. I want to vote for Jesus Christ Superstar #1, with Vice Pres. Steve Jobs. Is that too much to ask for?



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 42
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 42
    John Kerry should make for a wonderful President.



    Fellowship
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 42
    shetlineshetline Posts: 4,695member
    I haven't watched Saturday Night Live for ages, but I had to watch with Al Gore on. While he might not want to quit his day job (whatever that might be these days) for a career in comedy, he did surprisingly well. That hot tub scene with the faux Joe Lieberman was howling funny! I'm sure if Gore had decided to run the Republicans would have tried to use a picture of that scene against him.



    And Al Gore as Trent Lott... wow.



    Anyway, I'm not all that surprised that Gore doesn't want to run in 2004. Not that I'm terribly impressed with Bush -- I think his popularity would be at about 30% now if it weren't for 9/11. The American public in general, however, seems to be taken in by his folksy charm (read bumbling simple-mindedness) and I'm guessing that barring unforeseen circumstances Bush is a shoe-in for reelection.



    It's hard enough losing the election once and running again, I don't think Gore wants to lose twice and try again a third time in 2008. It's a gamble -- if things do change and another dem wins in 2004 then Al's in an even tougher position.



    Playing the odds, however, if I were Gore I'd be betting on a 2004 Bush reelection. Al doesn't run, and another dem gets beat up losing to Bush. 2008 rolls around, people are more likely to be ready for a change, and with another dem besides Gore having lost to Bush too, having lost to Bush himself won't seem as big a stigma.



    But who knows... I'm just theorizing and there could be plenty of other reasons for Gore not to run. I tend to believe that Gore still wants to be President someday, and that his decision not to run in 2004 has nothing to do with not wanting to eventually run again.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 42
    ast3r3xast3r3x Posts: 5,012member
    hmm...steve jobs for president...think US market share would go down, while inflation goes up (every thing costs more)



    ...the whitehouse would be redesigned with a cleaner more new age look



    its a shame gore isn't going to run, he would've/would be an excellent president, and would do good to the economy...and on the daily show and saturday night live he was a lot less stiff, which might have given him that little push over bush in the last election
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 42
    [quote] Playing the odds, however, if I were Gore I'd be betting on a 2004 Bush reelection. Al doesn't run, and another dem gets beat up losing to Bush. 2008 rolls around, people are more likely to be ready for a change, and with another dem besides Gore having lost to Bush too, having lost to Bush himself won't seem as big a stigma. <hr></blockquote>



    That sounds like the most logical reason I think. But that definitely rests upon the premise that Gore will run in 2008 assuming a Bush Reelection. At that point, would it be a Gore/Clinton Ticket?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 42
    stunnedstunned Posts: 1,096member
    I am not surprised. the next few years are going to be tough for the US president with economic and terrorism issues gonna get worse.



    But I dun like Bush.... Hope someone with more peaceful sense take over.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 42
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    This is good news for the Democrats. I don't know who they should send up to run against Bush. The democrats could play it very wrong for two years and wind up being so anti-Bush on everything that they are anti-american on some things.





    They have to get rid of that Terry guy. What a chump. He helped to blow it for them in the mid term. Total scum bag.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 42
    i was surprised with as much effort as Gore has put in lately to be public that he's decided not to run.



    i wonder how that will affect future bids for the Presidency if he decides to run in the future...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 42
    Don't be fooled. The DLC- type Democrats are entirely cynical about 2004. This move was designed to get Hillary Clinton in the White House in the 2008. Just look at who commented in the latest CNN article: former President Clinton and Senator Clinton. Sometimes you have to lose to win.



    I'll be in law school when HRC runs, and I tell you this: It's gonna be a hell of a campaign.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 42
    dunno, Hilary comes off as a bit paranoid to be running as the first major party women canidate. all the "vast right wing conspiracy" stuff comes off as over the top.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 42
    If you knew what she was talking about it wouldn't.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 42
    That is funny that you said that though, being in the same general ideology as one of the most paranoid Presidents in history, Mr. "al Qaeda is gonna attack us at any moment and Saddam's got nukes that he's gonna use."



    Really, you're a conservative who's irked that yeah there just might have been a concerted effort against her husband to discredit him at every turn. Spare me the scapegoated, straw-manned, any reason to discredit her drivel.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.