This is like a woman getting raped, and saying "I bet that slut asked for it".
When people freak out over you saying that, you reply:
"What? I don't think she did, I'm just pointing out that possibility!! What are you so mad about?"</strong><hr></blockquote>
The astronauts didn't ask for it. You're really stretching it. No one doubts the mechanical errors. I doubt the causes. Ooops.. haha I just ducked.. Now I'm running!
but didn't u know that the whole space program has always been a fake...a decoy to take our minds off domestic problems. and whenever we need a distraction, just blow something up and we conveniently forget about what's going on in the rest of the world.
SPJ...geniuses like you also doubted the moon landings, and it disgusts me...
Well since the world isn't round, it is pretty hard to orbit it now isn't it. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
<strong>Well since the world isn't round, it is pretty hard to orbit it now isn't it. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
[pulling thread, kicking and screaming, back towards topic]
Wouldn't it suck if this was a software bug? The shuttle was on autopilot, right? And NASA just said today that the computer detected increased drag on the left side, and adjusted control surfaces to compensate. But they had never had an increase in drag quite so big on a reentry before. What if the computer overcompensated, and sent the shuttle tumbling? It's probably tricky to model these Mach 12 situations for QA. And NASA was sure that even the high end of their tile-damage predictions would produce only "localized minor structural damage". Yech.
<strong>Because it's true. We would be talking about Bush's record deficits had this latest disaster not shifted the nation's attention.</strong><hr></blockquote>
You're an < >. The "record" deficits are smaller in % than previous ones. It's only in total dollars that they are a "record". It's called inflation. Take and economics course freshman.
You're anti-Bush hatred had taken you to new levels of hysteria.
You're an < >. The "record" deficits are smaller in % than previous ones. It's only in total dollars that they are a "record". It's called inflation. Take and economics course freshman.
You're anti-Bush hatred had taken you to new levels of hysteria.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I have to agree with you on this one...however, you are an extremist in the opposite direction. You and SPJ are simply opposite sides of the same coin.
I have to agree with you on this one...however, you are an extremist in the opposite direction. You and SPJ are simply opposite sides of the same coin.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Not at all. I don't come up with silly conspiracy theories because I hate <insert democrat here>.
Ooooopps <img src="embarrassed.gif" border="0"> NASucks needs to be shut down.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Scott. For the last time, link the story from google news so we don't have to log in. I'm happy you have a login for us but it's completely unnecessary.
Comments
This is like a woman getting raped, and saying "I bet that slut asked for it".
When people freak out over you saying that, you reply:
"What? I don't think she did, I'm just pointing out that possibility!! What are you so mad about?"
<strong>EUGENE IS A GOD.</strong><hr></blockquote>
EUGENE BLESS AMERICA
<strong>No.
This is like a woman getting raped, and saying "I bet that slut asked for it".
When people freak out over you saying that, you reply:
"What? I don't think she did, I'm just pointing out that possibility!! What are you so mad about?"</strong><hr></blockquote>
The astronauts didn't ask for it. You're really stretching it. No one doubts the mechanical errors. I doubt the causes. Ooops.. haha I just ducked.. Now I'm running!
BTw, Eugene, you just won post of the year, buddy,
[ 02-03-2003: Message edited by: Eugene ]</p>
The breakup on radar:
<a href="http://www.thadk.net/images/shuttle-crash.gif"; target="_blank">http://www.thadk.net/images/shuttle-crash.gif</a>;
[ 02-04-2003: Message edited by: nosey ]</p>
SPJ...geniuses like you also doubted the moon landings, and it disgusts me...
<strong>Well since the world isn't round, it is pretty hard to orbit it now isn't it. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
Wouldn't it suck if this was a software bug? The shuttle was on autopilot, right? And NASA just said today that the computer detected increased drag on the left side, and adjusted control surfaces to compensate. But they had never had an increase in drag quite so big on a reentry before. What if the computer overcompensated, and sent the shuttle tumbling? It's probably tricky to model these Mach 12 situations for QA. And NASA was sure that even the high end of their tile-damage predictions would produce only "localized minor structural damage". Yech.
<strong>Because it's true. We would be talking about Bush's record deficits had this latest disaster not shifted the nation's attention.</strong><hr></blockquote>
You're an < >. The "record" deficits are smaller in % than previous ones. It's only in total dollars that they are a "record". It's called inflation. Take and economics course freshman.
You're anti-Bush hatred had taken you to new levels of hysteria.
<strong>
You're an < >. The "record" deficits are smaller in % than previous ones. It's only in total dollars that they are a "record". It's called inflation. Take and economics course freshman.
You're anti-Bush hatred had taken you to new levels of hysteria.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I have to agree with you on this one...however, you are an extremist in the opposite direction. You and SPJ are simply opposite sides of the same coin.
<strong>
I have to agree with you on this one...however, you are an extremist in the opposite direction. You and SPJ are simply opposite sides of the same coin.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Not at all. I don't come up with silly conspiracy theories because I hate <insert democrat here>.
<strong>
Not at all. I don't come up with silly conspiracy theories because I hate <insert democrat here>.</strong><hr></blockquote>
No, you just call anyone who criticizes america an anti-US hating bastard hitler demon antichrist.
<strong>
No, you just call anyone who criticizes america an anti-US hating bastard hitler demon antichrist.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Ummm? No. In fact I think I was the one called a Nazi. A racist too.
Back on Topic?
Here's the latest from NYT
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/04/national/04WRON.html"; target="_blank">Engineer's '97 Report Warned of Damage to Tiles by Foam</a>
login: aimember
pass: aimember
Ooooopps <img src="embarrassed.gif" border="0"> NASucks needs to be shut down.
<strong>
Ummm? No. In fact I think I was the one called a Nazi. A racist too.
Back on Topic?
Here's the latest from NYT
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/04/national/04WRON.html"; target="_blank">Engineer's '97 Report Warned of Damage to Tiles by Foam</a>
login: aimember
pass: aimember
Ooooopps <img src="embarrassed.gif" border="0"> NASucks needs to be shut down.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Scott. For the last time, link the story from google news so we don't have to log in. I'm happy you have a login for us but it's completely unnecessary.
Here is the easy no login link:
<a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=68&ncid=68&e=2&u=/nyt/20030204/ts_nyt/engineer_s__97_report_warned_of_damage_to_tiles_by _foam" target="_blank">click here</a>
[ 02-04-2003: Message edited by: Brad ]</p>