Apple issues Mac OS X 10.6.8 Supplemental Update for Snow Leopard

Posted:
in macOS edited January 2014
Apple on Monday issued a recommended "Supplemental Update" for all Macs running Mac OS X Snow Leopard 10.6.8 that delivers a handful of final fixes for the previous-generation operating system.



Specifically, Apple said the 10.19MB update resolves issues with:

Transferring personal data, settings, and compatible applications from a Mac running Mac OS X Snow Leopard to a new Mac running Mac OS X Lion

Certain network printers that pause print jobs immediately and fail to complete

System audio that stops working when using HDMI or optical audio out

A similar 10.23MB update was released for Snow Leopard Server.



For those Macs that haven't yet moved to Snow Leopard version 10.6.8, Apple re-released its distributions of that point release with the supplemental fixes baked in:

Mac OS X 10.6.8 Update v.1.1 (453MB)

Mac OS X 10.6.8 Update Combo v1.1 (1.09GB)

Mac OS X Server v10.6.8 Update v1.1 (518MB)

Monday's releases would appear to be the final updates Apple has planned for the Snow Leopard operating system, with the company having released Mac OS X Lion last Wednesday.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 29
    squuiidsquuiid Posts: 55member
    "System audio that stops working when using HDMI or optical audio out"



    Where is the LION fix for this?!
  • Reply 2 of 29
    charlitunacharlituna Posts: 7,217member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Squuiid View Post


    "System audio that stops working when using HDMI or optical audio out"



    Where is the LION fix for this?!



    In an update to Lion. Which we will probably see in a day or two at most.
  • Reply 3 of 29
    I'd sincerely hope Apple will continue to upgrade Snow Leopard with bug fixes and updated peripherial hardware support like print drivers, etc.



    The user base has now certainly grown to a point where not everyone can simply upgrade to a new major release. First of all, some older hardware may be too slow or not have enough capacity to run Lion, but may still be sufficient for real world use. Second, especially with an upgrade that technically cannot run everything that worked before (e.g. the no-longer-existing services in Server or the missing Rosetta support), some people will have to stick. I'll leave one of my four Macs on Snow Leopard, because it runs a German accounting software that, until it's 2009 version, only ran in Rosetta emulation because of it's older Filemaker base. It won't be upgraded, but I need to keep those years around to look up records or if an audit comes up, so unless I find a legal and working way to run a VM with Snow, I'll not touch the OS install on that box. Many people will have similar reasons not to upgrade, especially when using pro-grade graphics, design, music and other tools. App upgrades of that magnitude don't happen quickly and they can be quite costly. Surely Apple has a more-ready-to-upgrade userbase, but if you look around and see how many XP or even NT4 boxes are still around, you get the idea.



    So supporting a "previous" release of an OS, at least with critical bug fixes and security update, including a formal commitment on how long this will be done (i.e. 5 years after it stopped shipping or so) is one of the steps a software company has to take to be taken seriously.



    Let's see - I hope AI is not right with it's "the last update" prediction this time - it would't really look nice for Apple.



    F.
  • Reply 4 of 29
    prof. peabodyprof. peabody Posts: 2,860member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by florianvk View Post


    I'd sincerely hope Apple will continue to upgrade Snow Leopard with bug fixes and updated peripherial hardware support like print drivers, etc. ... I hope AI is not right with it's "the last update" prediction this time - it would't really look nice for Apple.



    Almost certainly, the unusual step of releasing an update with the same version number as the last one was done primarily so that they would still have 10.6.9 left for other fixes.



    I would say the versioning numbers suggest that this is the *second* last update for 10.6, which sounds about right given that there is rarely more than one or two updates after the new full number version comes out.
  • Reply 5 of 29
    mdriftmeyermdriftmeyer Posts: 7,502member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post


    Almost certainly, the unusual step of releasing an update with the same version number as the last one was done primarily so that they would still have 10.6.9 left for other fixes.



    I would say the versioning numbers suggest that this is the *second* last update for 10.6, which sounds about right given that there is rarely more than one or two updates after the new full number version comes out.



    Right. This fix isn't big enough for a .x.x release and Apple doesn't want to extend it to the .x.x.x structure.
  • Reply 6 of 29
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 9,448member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by florianvk View Post




    So supporting a "previous" release of an OS, at least with critical bug fixes and security update, including a formal commitment on how long this will be done (i.e. 5 years after it stopped shipping or so) is one of the steps a software company has to take to be taken seriously.



    Let's see - I hope AI is not right with it's "the last update" prediction this time - it would't really look nice for Apple.



    F.



    So be just like MSFT to be taken seriously, eh? Apple has traditionally dragged its users kicking and screaming into the future whether they like it or not. It has worked out quite well for them it would seem. I see no reason for them to change their stripes now.
  • Reply 7 of 29
    ameldrum1ameldrum1 Posts: 254member
    This seems like decent evidence to support the principle of not updating to a new major release until the first dot update.



    It appears that this Snow Leopard update has as much to do with ensuring a trouble free transition to Lion as anything else.



    I'll probably wait another week or two just to make sure the kinks are ironed out before I switch to 10.7
  • Reply 8 of 29
    prof. peabodyprof. peabody Posts: 2,860member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ameldrum1 View Post


    This seems like decent evidence to support the principle of not updating to a new major release until the first dot update.



    It appears that this Snow Leopard update has as much to do with ensuring a trouble free transition to Lion as anything else.



    I'll probably wait another week or two just to make sure the kinks are ironed out before I switch to 10.7



    It's your choice of course, but I always wonder why anyone does this (waits). it's not like the bugs and glitches in a new version of OS-X are really ever *that* bad. This is one of the better ones, but even the worst updates ever are only really bad news for a tiny fraction of users and if it's a serious bug it's usually fixed within a week.



    Pretty much all the bugs I've encountered so far are minor video glitches and silly stuff that doesn't matter, with the exception of a giant privacy hole that has been introduced in Safari 5.1 and that's a "design choice" and unlikely to be fixed at all. Especially since no one seems to have noticed it yet or cares about it so far.
  • Reply 9 of 29
    djrumpydjrumpy Posts: 1,116member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Squuiid View Post


    "System audio that stops working when using HDMI or optical audio out"



    Where is the LION fix for this?!



    My thoughts exactly. I use a Mac Mini for a Media PC, and whenever I play an M4V with stereo AAC via optical out, it often stops working shortly after, requiring a reboot to get things working again. I was hoping the update to Lion would fix it, but unfortunately the problem exists there as well.



    Here's hoping they put out the patch for Lion in the inevitable post-release update.
  • Reply 10 of 29
    When did Apple remove the "Download Only" option in Apple Software Update? I came to download this update and this was there instead:







    A quick Google and Apple Community search seems to suggest that I'm the first to notice it...



    EDIT: And, for that matter, the "Install and Keep Package" is also gone.
  • Reply 11 of 29
    djrumpydjrumpy Posts: 1,116member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by bobmarleypeople View Post


    When did Apple remove the "Download Only" option in Apple Software Update? I came to download this update and this was there instead:







    A quick Google and Apple Community search seems to suggest that I'm the first to notice it...



    EDIT: And, for that matter, the "Install and Keep Package" is also gone.



    You can just go to the downloads page via the last menu item there, download it, and install it later.
  • Reply 12 of 29
    modemode Posts: 163member
    So Snow Leopard lived it's life with never having graphics drivers.
  • Reply 13 of 29
    djrumpydjrumpy Posts: 1,116member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post


    It's your choice of course, but I always wonder why anyone does this (waits). it's not like the bugs and glitches in a new version of OS-X are really ever *that* bad. This is one of the better ones, but even the worst updates ever are only really bad news for a tiny fraction of users and if it's a serious bug it's usually fixed within a week.



    Pretty much all the bugs I've encountered so far are minor video glitches and silly stuff that doesn't matter, with the exception of a giant privacy hole that has been introduced in Safari 5.1 and that's a "design choice" and unlikely to be fixed at all. Especially since no one seems to have noticed it yet or cares about it so far.



    I typically install a new OS on a spare partition and bang on it a couple of weeks. I'm in the Apple Developer program though so this makes things a bit easier to do, as well as to provide feedback, but I see no reason why anyone else couldn't do the same. Once I'm comfortable that there are no major gotchas, I just wipe, install, and then restore the bits I want on the new OS. I agree, the folks who wait for months (years?) are just torturing themselves for the low low price of $29 dollars
  • Reply 14 of 29
    chabigchabig Posts: 640member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post


    Almost certainly, the unusual step of releasing an update with the same version number as the last one was done primarily so that they would still have 10.6.9 left for other fixes.



    We don't know Apple's reasoning, but they could have called it 10.6.9 and still had plenty of number remaining (10.6.10, 10.6.11, 10.6.12, etc.) for future updates. I think a better reason is that 10.6.9 is already in the works and these fixes were made to the 10.6.8 codebase, not the 10.6.9 code.
  • Reply 15 of 29
    eluardeluard Posts: 319member
    I'd be very surprised if there is another dot update for Snow Leopard in the pipeline. Those who are hoping for this should prepare themselves for the possibility of it not happening.
  • Reply 16 of 29
    jonamacjonamac Posts: 385member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post


    Almost certainly, the unusual step of releasing an update with the same version number as the last one was done primarily so that they would still have 10.6.9 left for other fixes.



    I would say the versioning numbers suggest that this is the *second* last update for 10.6, which sounds about right given that there is rarely more than one or two updates after the new full number version comes out.



    Leopard is still at 10.5.8. I don't think Apple feel the need to fill up all the .x.y slots. It's entirely possible there will never be a 10.6.9.
  • Reply 17 of 29
    chabigchabig Posts: 640member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Jonamac View Post


    Leopard is still at 10.5.8. I don't think Apple feel the need to fill up all the .x.y slots.



    I hope they don't even try, because there is an infinite number of them!
  • Reply 18 of 29
    prof. peabodyprof. peabody Posts: 2,860member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by chabig View Post


    We don't know Apple's reasoning, but they could have called it 10.6.9 and still had plenty of number remaining (10.6.10, 10.6.11, 10.6.12, etc.) for future updates. I think a better reason is that 10.6.9 is already in the works and these fixes were made to the 10.6.8 codebase, not the 10.6.9 code.



    Yes, the existence of the Tiger 10.4.11 occurred to me about a half hour after I made that statement.

    I think you are probably right, but it could be the way I initially said also. They have gone past 0.9 updates before, but at other times it seems they jumped through hoops not to. In the end it probably doesn't matter as long as they have some kind of plan.
  • Reply 19 of 29
    bsenkabsenka Posts: 799member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post


    It's your choice of course, but I always wonder why anyone does this (waits). it's not like the bugs and glitches in a new version of OS-X are really ever *that* bad. This is one of the better ones, but even the worst updates ever are only really bad news for a tiny fraction of users and if it's a serious bug it's usually fixed within a week.



    I always wait for my work machine. I upgrade my Macbook that I only use for home stuff, and observe how it works for a while before I update the work machine. If it's working, I don't want to change that. The glitches may not be that bad, but I'd rather stick with no glitches.
  • Reply 20 of 29
    nvidia2008nvidia2008 Posts: 9,262member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post


    Certain network printers that pause print jobs immediately and fail to complete...



    Discovered this bug yesterday. Quite annoying. Well done Apple on the fix! (if it works )



    The fact that Fuji Xerox works lousily with Macs still remains though.



    Anyway, applying the fix now. We'll see what happens. Luckily work has a HP black and colour printer that seems to work fine.
Sign In or Register to comment.