Purported 'iPad 3' rear panel measures 0.81mm thicker than iPad 2

13

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 75
    apple ][apple ][ Posts: 9,233member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by melgross View Post


    Of course, while it may not be likely, the 3 could end up the same thickness as the 2. Why? Because the screen stands proud of the case. If they redesigned this so that the screen didn't stick out as far, then all could be the same.



    Just a thought, not saying that it's happening.



    Why isn't it likely?



    Doesn't each generation use an improved glass that's thinner than before?
  • Reply 42 of 75
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by malax View Post


    I could have lived with 0.8mm thicker, but that extra 1/100th of a millimeter is a deal-breaker for me. I'll wait for iPad 4.



    I'm with you on this. Jobs would have never let this get out the door... the end is near! Time to buy an Android, I hear they are up to version 2.3. All the bugs should be worked out by now.
  • Reply 43 of 75
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Apple ][ View Post


    Why isn't it likely?



    Doesn't each generation use an improved glass that's thinner than before?



    Gorilla Glass 2 is 20% thinner than Gorilla Glass 1 so it's down to 0.8mm thick.



    We don't know if that difference we're seeing is 0.2mm less than it would have been if not for GG2 which is supposed to be widely available in the next month or two.
  • Reply 44 of 75
    All hail the fatpad!



    Seriously though good idea to curve the sides again to hold it more easily and release that gorgeous retina display already!



    Any news on if the glass will be fused to the screen a la iPhone? That will make a hell of a lot of difference with screen glare and even better readability.
  • Reply 45 of 75
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by jlandd View Post


    Same here. I'm always surprised that the weight of iPads doesn't come up more than it does. I'm a healthy mid sized male and I consider its weight a noticeable thing.



    You should try toting around a late-2006 15" MBP for a while to build up your upper body strength.

  • Reply 46 of 75
    kevtkevt Posts: 195member
    With such small measurements you can get a better feel for what it means in percentage terms. 9% thicker. Probably only noticeable if you're really looking for it.



    No big deal for me. I agree with earlier posters that weight is more significant. If it turns out 9% heavier I'll be disappointed.
  • Reply 47 of 75
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by primedetailer View Post


    Hmmm - 25.4mm + 1". That would make the new Ipad 3 3/4" thick.



    They needed the thickness for a floppy drive.
  • Reply 48 of 75
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mjtomlin View Post


    Not necessarily. The edge of the supposed new iPad tapers in further, this may have been a result of needing to make the device the same thickness at the same distance from the edge, so that it could be a little thicker overall, but still fit in a thinner dock connector. This would also place connectors at the exact same position/location, so that they could also fit into older iPad docks.



    The iPad3 will fit, just use your back more when inserting.
  • Reply 49 of 75
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Flaneur View Post


    Well, thank you.



    I was concerned that I was just pointing out something that was screamingly obvious to everyone, but I see I needn't have worried.



    For all the metrically challenged out there, a Starbucks stirring stick is 6mm wide. A pencil is 7mm in diameter.



    ...and the iPad3 is apparently 95.0 mm.



    I wonder if circus strongmen will be able to tear an iPad in two???
  • Reply 50 of 75
    Did nobody notice that the measurements were for different iPads? An iPad WIFI versus an iPad wifi+3g. Also notice that they don't show in the graphic if the caliper is resting directly on the screen. It would be so easy to fake this graphic it's not even funny.
  • Reply 51 of 75
    apple ][apple ][ Posts: 9,233member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post


    Gorilla Glass 2 is 20% thinner than Gorilla Glass 1 so it's down to 0.8mm thick.



    We don't know if that difference we're seeing is 0.2mm less than it would have been if not for GG2 which is supposed to be widely available in the next month or two.



    According to this link I found, the iPad2 glass is 27% thinner than the iPad1 glass.



    A series of stress tests show that Apple?s new iPad 2 has significantly stronger glass than its predecessor, even though it?s 27 percent thinner.



    http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2011/03/ipad-2-glass/
  • Reply 52 of 75
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Apple ][ View Post


    According to this link I found, the iPad2 glass is 27% thinner than the iPad1 glass.



    A series of stress tests show that Apple?s new iPad 2 has significantly stronger glass than its predecessor, even though it?s 27 percent thinner.



    http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2011/03/ipad-2-glass/



    I don't understand the relevance to GG1 v GG2.
  • Reply 53 of 75
    apple ][apple ][ Posts: 9,233member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post


    I don't understand the relevance to GG1 v GG2.



    I was just wondering what the iPad 1 and the iPad 2 uses. Are they both Gorilla Glass or just one of them?
  • Reply 54 of 75
    apple ][apple ][ Posts: 9,233member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by bjojade View Post


    Did nobody notice that the measurements were for different iPads? An iPad WIFI versus an iPad wifi+3g. Also notice that they don't show in the graphic if the caliper is resting directly on the screen. It would be so easy to fake this graphic it's not even funny.



    I agree. As long as they don't show the front side (the display/glass) of the iPad, then nobody can really trust these measurements.
  • Reply 55 of 75
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Apple ][ View Post


    I was just wondering what the iPad 1 and the iPad 2 uses. Are they both Gorilla Glass or just one of them?



    Ah. Yeah, I think they would both have to be in order to get a sheet of glass that large and thin to work. Note that by Gorilla Glass it may not necessarily be Corning's brand, it could be other alkali-aluminosilicate sheet glass though I think Corning is likely their supplier.
  • Reply 56 of 75
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post


    ...small issue I know but it would be nice in some situations like camping in a small tent ... not that I'd be using it for that



    Home made camping porn?

  • Reply 57 of 75
    melgrossmelgross Posts: 33,599member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Apple ][ View Post


    Why isn't it likely?



    Doesn't each generation use an improved glass that's thinner than before?



    I was thinking that they might decide to recess the panel a bit more. But they must have reasons why they don't.
  • Reply 58 of 75
    With this article I think I will stop reading Apple Insider.



    The accuracy of its copy is an embarrassment. Having the decimal point in the wrong place makes this iPad3 9.5cm thick. How can this not be noticed by even the briefest of proof reading? It's literally an order of magnitude out. The sheer volume of typographical errors is beyond excuse on here and they just don't seem to care. Such a simple thing that makes them look like complete amateurs.



    Add to that that this is an entire article about 0.81mm and you can't help but find this tedious in the extreme.
  • Reply 59 of 75
    Am I the only one who finds something fetishistic about the quality of attention paid to these products?



    Go to any rubber, leather, corset, bondage, or other sexual fetish site and note the resemblances. I'd like to see AppleInsider run a well designed survey of how many iPad owners masturbate with the device before displaying porn on it.
  • Reply 60 of 75
    OMG it's thicker! iPad is going backwards! Oh Noes! Apple is Doomed?
Sign In or Register to comment.