Funny when someone attempts to make fun of another member for not doing a Google search, yet doesn't do one himself and offer a link.
Yes, I had already done a Google search, and no I don't find anyone making LiquidMetal golf clubs. There's a few old "non-conforming" clubs (as one golfer called them) on eBay, but nothing being produced currently that I can find. Perhaps you could help a member out with a real link to a current producer Jragosta.
Funny when someone attempts to make fun of another member for not doing a Google search, yet doesn't do one himself and offer a link.
Yes, I had already done a Google search, and no I don't find anyone making LiquidMetal golf clubs. There's a few old "non-conforming" clubs (as one golfer called them) on eBay, but nothing being produced currently that I can find. Perhaps you could help a member out with a real link to a current producer Jragosta.
Geez. I guess we can understand why you hate Apple so much. You can't even figure out how to do a Google search and you're upset because Mac users are able to do things with their computers.
(Sorry, I can't read it, but the summary on Yahoo was:
Liquidmetal Golf Clubs designed for the mid to high handicapper utilizing the Liquidmetal technology. Liquidmetal is harder than titanium, more forgiving,and vibration free"
As I said Jr, none of those are currently produced as far as I can tell. Rather than jumping all over as tho you've proven something, just one link to a current producer is all I originally requested. It would be even more evidence of the impact resistance, and a useful reply.
You've not offered anything other than poor attempts at mocking instead of an answer so I don't even know why you bothered responding. I suppose this is where you disappear from the conversation rather than admit any mistake.
As I said Jr, none of those are currently produced as far as I can tell. Rather than jumping all over as tho you've proven something, just one link to a current producer is all I originally requested. It would be even more evidence of the impact resistance, and a useful reply.
You've not offered anything other than poor attempts at mocking instead of an answer so I don't even know why you bothered responding. I suppose this is where you disappear from the conversation rather than admit any mistake.
Those are all currently available for purchase. If you want to know if they're being produced, call the manufacturer.
Researched. They're not, having been discontinued years ago. But at least you're consistent in not admitting a mistake when you make one.
Really was no biggie to begin with. If you didn't have a legitimate answer it would have been better not to answer with mocking to begin with as tho you knew something. You're a smart guy, but there's a lot of smart guys here. Belittling others doesn't get you additional points or respect. You might consider some courtesy.
now wait for smart-aleck response along the lines of "I only respect those who have earned it" or something to that effect
Researched. They're not, having been discontinued years ago. But at least you're consistent in not admitting a mistake when you make one.
Really was no biggie to begin with. If you didn't have a legitimate answer it would have been better not to answer with mocking to begin with as tho you knew something. You're a smart guy, but there's a lot of smart guys here. Belittling others doesn't get you additional points or respect. You might consider some courtesy.
now wait for response along the lines of "I only respect those who have earned it" or something to that effect
Researched. They're not, having been discontinued years ago. But at least you're consistent in not admitting a mistake when you make one.
Really was no biggie to begin with. If you didn't have a legitimate answer it would have been better not to answer with mocking to begin with as tho you knew something. You're a smart guy, but there's a lot of smart guys here. Belittling others doesn't get you additional points or respect. You might consider some courtesy.
now wait for response along the lines of "I only respect those who have earned it" or something to that effect
Maybe while you're asking someone to teach you how to use Google, you can also ask them to teach you how to use this forum so you don't have to double post.
In reality, I couldn't care less about your nonsense. You asked about availability of Liquidmetal golf clubs. I gave you a bunch of sources. If you want to worry about whether they're actually producing more, that's your problem. If you were really serious, being able to buy one would be far more important than whether the factory was still making them.
Originally Posted by jragosta If you were really serious, being able to buy one would be far more important than whether the factory was still making them.
No, it's more important whether they were still producing them. Indications are that they weren't holding up to impact. If there was still a producer of Liquidmetal clubs that would indicate they've overcome the problem. Since there apparently isn't perhaps impact-resistance might not be one of its big advantages.
You seem to be suffering from a really serious envy problem.
Wait, what? Yes, that's right -- I'm envious of all the Android owners out there because they are lucky enough to have an operating system with a super-cool name.
Or did you somehow mistake my homage/parody of Apple's innovativeness and Steve Jobsian adjectives as signs of me being an Apple-hater? Seeing as I how first read this thread on my iPhone 4, first commented from my MacBook and now am responding on a Mini, you decide...
Wait, what? Yes, that's right -- I'm envious of all the Android owners out there because they are lucky enough to have an operating system with a super-cool name.
Or did you somehow mistake my homage/parody of Apple's innovativeness and Steve Jobsian adjectives as signs of me being an Apple-hater? Seeing as I how first read this thread on my iPhone 4, first commented from my MacBook and now am responding on a Mini, you decide...
I do decide. Haters often say they own Apple hardware X, Y and Z, giving them the right to say certain things about it. It's a ridiculously trite pattern of non-working attempted subterfuge.
Well, if they were really owners they would be speaking differently. Not that they wold always sing the praises unequivocally, but there is a marked difference between pining for a better experience and just plain ripping the experience.
Having done the very simple I own X, Y and Z pattern, but not writing anything that communicates an actual experience with the products does not bode well for us believing you. It's not hard to expose a poseur, especially a brand new poster-version.
I do decide. Haters often say they own Apple hardware X, Y and Z, giving them the right to say certain things about it. It's a ridiculously trite pattern of non-working attempted subterfuge.
Well, if they were really owners they would be speaking differently. Not that they wold always sing the praises unequivocally, but there is a marked difference between pining for a better experience and just plain ripping the experience.
Having done the very simple I own X, Y and Z pattern, but not writing anything that communicates an actual experience with the products does not bode well for us believing you. It's not hard to expose a poseur, especially a brand new poster-version.
The funny thing is that you get people like 'I am a zzzz' posting completely fabricated reviews on forums. Look at the bottom of this page and see the 'recent reviews' section. zzz posts reviews on both the iPhone 3GS and iPhone 4 within 15 minutes of each other. Given his posting history, it's extremely unlikely that he owns two iPhones, let alone uses both of them. Not to mention, of course, that the reviews are completely unlike the reviews of people who actually own the devices and read exactly like zzz's normal drivel.
I wonder what kind of mental illness makes you spend that much time on a forum for a product that you don't use, never plan to use, and won't even consider using so that you can insult people who use the product and spend countless hours simply bad-mouthing a product you don't use. And then you create fabricated reviews to try to make the product look bad. It's one thing to talk about a product that you use and like among people with similar interests, but that behavior is just bizarre.
Unless he's being paid to do this, it suggests a serious character defect.
Comments
Funny when someone attempts to make fun of another member for not doing a Google search, yet doesn't do one himself and offer a link.
Yes, I had already done a Google search, and no I don't find anyone making LiquidMetal golf clubs. There's a few old "non-conforming" clubs (as one golfer called them) on eBay, but nothing being produced currently that I can find. Perhaps you could help a member out with a real link to a current producer Jragosta.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorguy
Funny when someone attempts to make fun of another member for not doing a Google search, yet doesn't do one himself and offer a link.
Yes, I had already done a Google search, and no I don't find anyone making LiquidMetal golf clubs. There's a few old "non-conforming" clubs (as one golfer called them) on eBay, but nothing being produced currently that I can find. Perhaps you could help a member out with a real link to a current producer Jragosta.
Geez. I guess we can understand why you hate Apple so much. You can't even figure out how to do a Google search and you're upset because Mac users are able to do things with their computers.
http://www.overstock.com/Sports-Toys/Liquidmetal-HLS-3-Wood-Golf-Club/2768153/product.html
http://www.golfproductnews.com/liquidmetal-golf-fairway-woods/
http://www.cbssports.com/story/5564401
http://www.equip2golf.com/reviews/fairway_woods/LMG_liquidmetal.html
http://www.ausgolf.com.au/liquidmetal-ls-1-putter
http://www.lmgsportsinc.com/
(Sorry, I can't read it, but the summary on Yahoo was:
Liquidmetal Golf Clubs designed for the mid to high handicapper utilizing the Liquidmetal technology. Liquidmetal is harder than titanium, more forgiving,and vibration free"
http://www.overstock.com/Sports-Toys/Liquidmetal-Tour-Vision-FA-1-Milled-Putter/2478670/product.html
And so on. And on. And on.
As I said Jr, none of those are currently produced as far as I can tell. Rather than jumping all over as tho you've proven something, just one link to a current producer is all I originally requested. It would be even more evidence of the impact resistance, and a useful reply.
You've not offered anything other than poor attempts at mocking instead of an answer so I don't even know why you bothered responding. I suppose this is where you disappear from the conversation rather than admit any mistake.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorguy
As I said Jr, none of those are currently produced as far as I can tell. Rather than jumping all over as tho you've proven something, just one link to a current producer is all I originally requested. It would be even more evidence of the impact resistance, and a useful reply.
You've not offered anything other than poor attempts at mocking instead of an answer so I don't even know why you bothered responding. I suppose this is where you disappear from the conversation rather than admit any mistake.
Those are all currently available for purchase. If you want to know if they're being produced, call the manufacturer.
Researched. They're not, having been discontinued years ago. But at least you're consistent in not admitting a mistake when you make one.
Really was no biggie to begin with. If you didn't have a legitimate answer it would have been better not to answer with mocking to begin with as tho you knew something. You're a smart guy, but there's a lot of smart guys here. Belittling others doesn't get you additional points or respect. You might consider some courtesy.
now wait for smart-aleck response along the lines of "I only respect those who have earned it" or something to that effect
Researched. They're not, having been discontinued years ago. But at least you're consistent in not admitting a mistake when you make one.
Really was no biggie to begin with. If you didn't have a legitimate answer it would have been better not to answer with mocking to begin with as tho you knew something. You're a smart guy, but there's a lot of smart guys here. Belittling others doesn't get you additional points or respect. You might consider some courtesy.
now wait for response along the lines of "I only respect those who have earned it" or something to that effect
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorguy
Researched. They're not, having been discontinued years ago. But at least you're consistent in not admitting a mistake when you make one.
Really was no biggie to begin with. If you didn't have a legitimate answer it would have been better not to answer with mocking to begin with as tho you knew something. You're a smart guy, but there's a lot of smart guys here. Belittling others doesn't get you additional points or respect. You might consider some courtesy.
now wait for response along the lines of "I only respect those who have earned it" or something to that effect
Maybe while you're asking someone to teach you how to use Google, you can also ask them to teach you how to use this forum so you don't have to double post.
In reality, I couldn't care less about your nonsense. You asked about availability of Liquidmetal golf clubs. I gave you a bunch of sources. If you want to worry about whether they're actually producing more, that's your problem. If you were really serious, being able to buy one would be far more important than whether the factory was still making them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta
No, it's more important whether they were still producing them. Indications are that they weren't holding up to impact. If there was still a producer of Liquidmetal clubs that would indicate they've overcome the problem. Since there apparently isn't perhaps impact-resistance might not be one of its big advantages.
Wait, what? Yes, that's right -- I'm envious of all the Android owners out there because they are lucky enough to have an operating system with a super-cool name.
Or did you somehow mistake my homage/parody of Apple's innovativeness and Steve Jobsian adjectives as signs of me being an Apple-hater? Seeing as I how first read this thread on my iPhone 4, first commented from my MacBook and now am responding on a Mini, you decide...
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmhisey
Wait, what? Yes, that's right -- I'm envious of all the Android owners out there because they are lucky enough to have an operating system with a super-cool name.
Or did you somehow mistake my homage/parody of Apple's innovativeness and Steve Jobsian adjectives as signs of me being an Apple-hater? Seeing as I how first read this thread on my iPhone 4, first commented from my MacBook and now am responding on a Mini, you decide...
I do decide. Haters often say they own Apple hardware X, Y and Z, giving them the right to say certain things about it. It's a ridiculously trite pattern of non-working attempted subterfuge.
Well, if they were really owners they would be speaking differently. Not that they wold always sing the praises unequivocally, but there is a marked difference between pining for a better experience and just plain ripping the experience.
Having done the very simple I own X, Y and Z pattern, but not writing anything that communicates an actual experience with the products does not bode well for us believing you. It's not hard to expose a poseur, especially a brand new poster-version.
The building Lord really invincible, thought very have routines.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
You may also like:[url=http://www.rs4play.com/]Rs Gold[/url]|[url=http://www.rs4play.com/gold/]Cheap runescape gold[/url]
|[url=http://www.mmohome.com/]runescape gold[/url]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hiro
I do decide. Haters often say they own Apple hardware X, Y and Z, giving them the right to say certain things about it. It's a ridiculously trite pattern of non-working attempted subterfuge.
Well, if they were really owners they would be speaking differently. Not that they wold always sing the praises unequivocally, but there is a marked difference between pining for a better experience and just plain ripping the experience.
Having done the very simple I own X, Y and Z pattern, but not writing anything that communicates an actual experience with the products does not bode well for us believing you. It's not hard to expose a poseur, especially a brand new poster-version.
The funny thing is that you get people like 'I am a zzzz' posting completely fabricated reviews on forums. Look at the bottom of this page and see the 'recent reviews' section. zzz posts reviews on both the iPhone 3GS and iPhone 4 within 15 minutes of each other. Given his posting history, it's extremely unlikely that he owns two iPhones, let alone uses both of them. Not to mention, of course, that the reviews are completely unlike the reviews of people who actually own the devices and read exactly like zzz's normal drivel.
I wonder what kind of mental illness makes you spend that much time on a forum for a product that you don't use, never plan to use, and won't even consider using so that you can insult people who use the product and spend countless hours simply bad-mouthing a product you don't use. And then you create fabricated reviews to try to make the product look bad. It's one thing to talk about a product that you use and like among people with similar interests, but that behavior is just bizarre.
Unless he's being paid to do this, it suggests a serious character defect.
The old iPhones were easy to spot, they had aluminum skin. These new iPhone 5 models, forget it, they sweat, have bad breath, everything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Junkyard Dawg
The old iPhones were easy to spot, they had aluminum skin. These new iPhone 6 models, forget it, they sweat, have bad breath, everything.
Which you know, because you've seen them, touched them, used them, etc.
Ah, wait…
Time to update your movie history, dude.