Samsung has to demand another judge than this Apple brown-noser Koh.
.. wah..wah... more iTrolling whining has been edited out ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTR
Don't tell us, you probably also think she's racist too.
(>_<)
I love the smell of Korean BBQ!
Shhh... don't tell Junior (a.k.a "Momma's-basement-boy") that the Judge is Korean! Surely she would not be biased if she sided for a Korean company right?? *rolls eyes*
Samsung has to demand another judge than this Apple brown-noser Koh.
This bitch is obviously biased.
And why this old Nazi scum Florian Mueller is being quoted is beyond me.
It must really hurt to see the object of your affections (Samsung) exposed for the lying copycats they are. We feel your rage and we know the truth hurts but get a grip.
What a strange poster. Banned now, I see, but apparently named after some lame Korean boy band, suggesting he/she is just a kid, but on the other hand posting with perfect English spelling, grammar and punctuation, which is rare in itself. Doesn't add up.
I should be so lucky. I first bought stock in AAPL when it looked like the company was going to go under, but I just liked their computers better, so I made the "smartest" investment in my life.
What a strange poster. Banned now, I see, but apparently named after some lame Korean boy band, suggesting he/she is just a kid, but on the other hand posting with perfect English spelling, grammar and punctuation, which is rare in itself. Doesn't add up.
We already know this judge will favor Apple in any proposal made. I'd like to know how much Apple is paying the judge and who in the uspto they are payiing off? I mean they got a patent approved in 3 months just this year, yet every other patent application is taking 4-5 years. I'm waiting for the uspto to give Apple a patent for the wheel.
There could be a lot of factors here. Maybe since Apple has been doing this for so long, once they submit a patent, it's ready to go hands down, no changes needed. Perhaps with everyone else they make a few revisions before their actual patent gets approved.
It also dawned on me just now. How many patents do these other guys have versus Apple? How many patents have the other guys "acquired" due to a merger or acquisition versus originally filing for?
<vc><strong>Judge Lucy Koh on Friday denied two Samsung-proposed definitions of disputed Apple patent tems, and instead ended up using wording taken directly from the iPhone maker's original patent filing to describe the claims.</strong>
It's been mentioned elsewhere but it would be funny if Koh ordered Samsung to publish an article on their website for 6 months saying they did copy Apple's designs or even better that Apple could post an article on their own site saying it right next to the one that says they didn't.
Everything is over the top in this forum! Where else can you find grown men fighting and obsessing over electronic gadgets and toys?
Everything is over the top in thousands (or tens of thousands) of tech forums. And meta-OTT in the political and personality ones. NTM grown women fight on the net as well, I'm jus' sayin'.....
"On the internet, everyone can see you scream...." ...if they wanna.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpamSandwich
YAT (Yet Another Tekstud)? I have my suspicions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredaroony
I'm being called tekstud in another thread so wondering how many are in here!
Bwah-hah-ha, TK is apparently legion... ...everywhere and nowhere... ...and if he never existed, we'd probably have to invent him.....
It's been mentioned elsewhere but it would be funny if Koh ordered Samsung to publish an article on their website for 6 months saying they did copy Apple's designs or even better that Apple could post an article on their own site saying it right next to the one that says they didn't.
It would be funnier if she ordered that they must do it on their UK website.
One assumes the seagulls in "Finding Nemo" were the result of observing how humans behave when we allow ourselves to be governed by the abstraction "corporation."
The only thing uglier than the coat-and-tie briefcase blood bath is our sick need to take (i.e., create) sides in what is, at its core, the short-sided destructive word view of greed crazed hoarders who have no goal in life beyond the blind, mindless, and frequently violent accumulation of that which they can't take with them.
As a culture and, increasingly, as individuals, it seems our first response to any resource, thought, feeling, idea, impulse, material (living or nonliving), geography… anything, absolutely anything at all… is "Who owns it?" Capitalism is turning out to be the process by which we assign a price tag to everything, thereby guaranteeing that nothing, not even life itself, has any value whatsoever.
At this late date, the most compassion I can muster for our species is to hope we slit our own throats quickly.
One assumes the seagulls in "Finding Nemo" were the result of observing how humans behave when we allow ourselves to be governed by the abstraction "corporation."
The only thing uglier than the coat-and-tie briefcase blood bath is our sick need to take (i.e., create) sides in what is, at its core, the short-sided destructive word view of greed crazed hoarders who have no goal in life beyond the blind, mindless, and frequently violent accumulation of that which they can't take with them.
As a culture and, increasingly, as individuals, it seems our first response to any resource, thought, feeling, idea, impulse, material (living or nonliving), geography… anything, absolutely anything at all… is "Who owns it?" Capitalism is turning out to be the process by which we assign a price tag to everything, thereby guaranteeing that nothing, not even life itself, has any value whatsoever.
At this late date, the most compassion I can muster for our species is to hope we slit our own throats quickly.
One assumes the seagulls in "Finding Nemo" were the result of observing how humans behave when we allow ourselves to be governed by the abstraction "corporation."
The only thing uglier than the coat-and-tie briefcase blood bath is our sick need to take (i.e., create) sides in what is, at its core, the short-sided destructive word view of greed crazed hoarders who have no goal in life beyond the blind, mindless, and frequently violent accumulation of that which they can't take with them.
As a culture and, increasingly, as individuals, it seems our first response to any resource, thought, feeling, idea, impulse, material (living or nonliving), geography… anything, absolutely anything at all… is "Who owns it?" Capitalism is turning out to be the process by which we assign a price tag to everything, thereby guaranteeing that nothing, not even life itself, has any value whatsoever.
At this late date, the most compassion I can muster for our species is to hope we slit our own throats quickly.
Of course, AI wouldnt dare post the latest ruling that Apple can not bring in prelimiary injunctions into the courts as prior evidence for infringement in the trial case. Not really surprising to be honest.
Just in: "In advance of the smaller iPad, Apple claimed they would never make, Apple received two patents filed just last week, for the concept of a 7" and/or 8" lighted screen thingies."
Now Apple will sue Barnes & Noble, Google and Amazon for violating their exclusive patent on 7 or 8 inches.
Lucy Koh will ban these devices immediately and her children will get a highly "subsidized" college education.
It's a win/win!
"Rectangular with rounded corners -- that's our invention and Samsung slavishly copied it!"
Just in: "In advance of the smaller iPad, Apple claimed they would never make, Apple received two patents filed just last week, for the concept of a 7" and/or 8" lighted screen thingies."
Now Apple will sue Barnes & Noble, Google and Amazon for violating their exclusive patent on 7 or 8 inches.
Lucy Koh will ban these devices immediately and her children will get a highly "subsidized" college education.
It's a win/win!
"Rectangular with rounded corners -- that's our invention and Samsung slavishly copied it!"
Comments
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperJunior
Samsung has to demand another judge than this Apple brown-noser Koh.
.. wah..wah... more iTrolling whining has been edited out ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTR
Don't tell us, you probably also think she's racist too.
(>_<)
I love the smell of Korean BBQ!
Shhh... don't tell Junior (a.k.a "Momma's-basement-boy") that the Judge is Korean! Surely she would not be biased if she sided for a Korean company right?? *rolls eyes*
What a strange poster. Banned now, I see, but apparently named after some lame Korean boy band, suggesting he/she is just a kid, but on the other hand posting with perfect English spelling, grammar and punctuation, which is rare in itself. Doesn't add up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610
Because he made such a smart choice.
I should be so lucky. I first bought stock in AAPL when it looked like the company was going to go under, but I just liked their computers better, so I made the "smartest" investment in my life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTR
Your wish is granted:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-9902748-37.html
Turns out you CAN reinvent the wheel!
Quote:
Originally Posted by muppetry
What a strange poster. Banned now, I see, but apparently named after some lame Korean boy band, suggesting he/she is just a kid, but on the other hand posting with perfect English spelling, grammar and punctuation, which is rare in itself. Doesn't add up.
YAT (Yet Another Tekstud)? I have my suspicions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpamSandwich
YAT (Yet Another Tekstud)? I have my suspicions.
I'm being called tekstud in another thread so wondering how many are in here!
SuperJunior was puppeting with KoreaFighting, at the very least. The latter hasn't been banned yet, but I imagine it will be soon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac.World
We already know this judge will favor Apple in any proposal made. I'd like to know how much Apple is paying the judge and who in the uspto they are payiing off? I mean they got a patent approved in 3 months just this year, yet every other patent application is taking 4-5 years. I'm waiting for the uspto to give Apple a patent for the wheel.
There could be a lot of factors here. Maybe since Apple has been doing this for so long, once they submit a patent, it's ready to go hands down, no changes needed. Perhaps with everyone else they make a few revisions before their actual patent gets approved.
It also dawned on me just now. How many patents do these other guys have versus Apple? How many patents have the other guys "acquired" due to a merger or acquisition versus originally filing for?
It's been mentioned elsewhere but it would be funny if Koh ordered Samsung to publish an article on their website for 6 months saying they did copy Apple's designs or even better that Apple could post an article on their own site saying it right next to the one that says they didn't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredaroony
Why would you be "proud" of owning stock in a company? Seems like an odd thing to be proud of.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610
Because he made such a smart choice.
Judging by various comments in several threads... is Fred a Rooney?
Urban Dictionary meanings of 'Rooney' include... "Jacked or stolen. To take something that is not rightfully theirs...
burglarize, cheat, defraud, embezzle, poach, purloin, ransack, remove, rifle, rip off, shoplift, swindle, swipe, take..."
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperJunior
Haha!
Everything is over the top in this forum! Where else can you find grown men fighting and obsessing over electronic gadgets and toys?
Everything is over the top in thousands (or tens of thousands) of tech forums. And meta-OTT in the political and personality ones. NTM grown women fight on the net as well, I'm jus' sayin'.....
"On the internet, everyone can see you scream...." ...if they wanna.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpamSandwich
YAT (Yet Another Tekstud)? I have my suspicions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredaroony
I'm being called tekstud in another thread so wondering how many are in here!
Bwah-hah-ha, TK is apparently legion... ...everywhere and nowhere... ...and if he never existed, we'd probably have to invent him.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperJunior
Haha!
Everything is over the top in this forum! Where else can you find grown men fighting and obsessing over electronic gadgets and toys?
Grown men don't need to attack others as iSheep, bitches, or Nazis. That's for children.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvin
It's been mentioned elsewhere but it would be funny if Koh ordered Samsung to publish an article on their website for 6 months saying they did copy Apple's designs or even better that Apple could post an article on their own site saying it right next to the one that says they didn't.
It would be funnier if she ordered that they must do it on their UK website.
Not possible. Koh has no jurisdiction over Apple's UK operations.
One assumes the seagulls in "Finding Nemo" were the result of observing how humans behave when we allow ourselves to be governed by the abstraction "corporation."
The only thing uglier than the coat-and-tie briefcase blood bath is our sick need to take (i.e., create) sides in what is, at its core, the short-sided destructive word view of greed crazed hoarders who have no goal in life beyond the blind, mindless, and frequently violent accumulation of that which they can't take with them.
As a culture and, increasingly, as individuals, it seems our first response to any resource, thought, feeling, idea, impulse, material (living or nonliving), geography… anything, absolutely anything at all… is "Who owns it?" Capitalism is turning out to be the process by which we assign a price tag to everything, thereby guaranteeing that nothing, not even life itself, has any value whatsoever.
At this late date, the most compassion I can muster for our species is to hope we slit our own throats quickly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbryanh
One assumes the seagulls in "Finding Nemo" were the result of observing how humans behave when we allow ourselves to be governed by the abstraction "corporation."
The only thing uglier than the coat-and-tie briefcase blood bath is our sick need to take (i.e., create) sides in what is, at its core, the short-sided destructive word view of greed crazed hoarders who have no goal in life beyond the blind, mindless, and frequently violent accumulation of that which they can't take with them.
As a culture and, increasingly, as individuals, it seems our first response to any resource, thought, feeling, idea, impulse, material (living or nonliving), geography… anything, absolutely anything at all… is "Who owns it?" Capitalism is turning out to be the process by which we assign a price tag to everything, thereby guaranteeing that nothing, not even life itself, has any value whatsoever.
At this late date, the most compassion I can muster for our species is to hope we slit our own throats quickly.
That'd be deep if it meant anything.
Here you go, by the way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbryanh
One assumes the seagulls in "Finding Nemo" were the result of observing how humans behave when we allow ourselves to be governed by the abstraction "corporation."
The only thing uglier than the coat-and-tie briefcase blood bath is our sick need to take (i.e., create) sides in what is, at its core, the short-sided destructive word view of greed crazed hoarders who have no goal in life beyond the blind, mindless, and frequently violent accumulation of that which they can't take with them.
As a culture and, increasingly, as individuals, it seems our first response to any resource, thought, feeling, idea, impulse, material (living or nonliving), geography… anything, absolutely anything at all… is "Who owns it?" Capitalism is turning out to be the process by which we assign a price tag to everything, thereby guaranteeing that nothing, not even life itself, has any value whatsoever.
At this late date, the most compassion I can muster for our species is to hope we slit our own throats quickly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil
That'd be deep if it meant anything.
Here you go, by the way.
Great idea, maybe rbryanh will want to consider joining.
Of course, AI wouldnt dare post the latest ruling that Apple can not bring in prelimiary injunctions into the courts as prior evidence for infringement in the trial case. Not really surprising to be honest.
Just in: "In advance of the smaller iPad, Apple claimed they would never make, Apple received two patents filed just last week, for the concept of a 7" and/or 8" lighted screen thingies."
Now Apple will sue Barnes & Noble, Google and Amazon for violating their exclusive patent on 7 or 8 inches.
Lucy Koh will ban these devices immediately and her children will get a highly "subsidized" college education.
It's a win/win!
"Rectangular with rounded corners -- that's our invention and Samsung slavishly copied it!"
Originally Posted by Farkus
Just in: "In advance of the smaller iPad, Apple claimed they would never make, Apple received two patents filed just last week, for the concept of a 7" and/or 8" lighted screen thingies."
Now Apple will sue Barnes & Noble, Google and Amazon for violating their exclusive patent on 7 or 8 inches.
Lucy Koh will ban these devices immediately and her children will get a highly "subsidized" college education.
It's a win/win!
"Rectangular with rounded corners -- that's our invention and Samsung slavishly copied it!"
Oh, come off it.