Apple seeks preliminary injunction against Samsung devices in post-trial motion
Following its significant court win over Samsung on Friday, Apple is seeking a preliminary injunction against the devices found to be infringing on the company's patents, citing "irreparable harm" if the units were to stay on sale.
Apple v. Samsung presiding Judge Lucy Koh scheduled a hearing for Sept. 20 to discuss Apple's proposal for a preliminary injunction against the devices a jury found to be infringing on numerous design and software patents. The ruling amounted to a nearly $1.05 billion windfall in damages for Apple.
According to in-court reports from The Verge, Judge Koh said Apple must file its proposal on Aug. 29, with Samsung being granted two weeks to draft a response due Sept. 12. Coincidentally, the response deadline is the same day Apple is rumored to debut the next-generation iPhone at an as-yet-unannounced special event.
Samsung attorney Kevin Johnson said two weeks is not enough to prepare the necessary documents to rebut the coming injunction motion, adding that his request for more time is just about "decency." Despite having other cases scheduled in the coming weeks, Judge Koh partially allowed the request but limited the number of pages each party can file. Before the trial's proceedings, the amount of documents regarding patents, trade dress and exhibits became overwhelming, and the court ordered both parties to winnow their claims in the interest of expediency.
Samsung's Galaxy S II smartphone is one of the devices named as infringing Apple's patents. | Source: Samsung
While the Apple filing should be entered soon, the companies offered responses to the jury's decision, giving two very different views of the outcome. Apple claims the ruling is a message that "stealing isn't right," while Samsung had a more dour take, saying the result "should not be viewed as a win for Apple, but as a loss for the American consumer."
Apple v. Samsung presiding Judge Lucy Koh scheduled a hearing for Sept. 20 to discuss Apple's proposal for a preliminary injunction against the devices a jury found to be infringing on numerous design and software patents. The ruling amounted to a nearly $1.05 billion windfall in damages for Apple.
According to in-court reports from The Verge, Judge Koh said Apple must file its proposal on Aug. 29, with Samsung being granted two weeks to draft a response due Sept. 12. Coincidentally, the response deadline is the same day Apple is rumored to debut the next-generation iPhone at an as-yet-unannounced special event.
Samsung attorney Kevin Johnson said two weeks is not enough to prepare the necessary documents to rebut the coming injunction motion, adding that his request for more time is just about "decency." Despite having other cases scheduled in the coming weeks, Judge Koh partially allowed the request but limited the number of pages each party can file. Before the trial's proceedings, the amount of documents regarding patents, trade dress and exhibits became overwhelming, and the court ordered both parties to winnow their claims in the interest of expediency.
Samsung's Galaxy S II smartphone is one of the devices named as infringing Apple's patents. | Source: Samsung
While the Apple filing should be entered soon, the companies offered responses to the jury's decision, giving two very different views of the outcome. Apple claims the ruling is a message that "stealing isn't right," while Samsung had a more dour take, saying the result "should not be viewed as a win for Apple, but as a loss for the American consumer."
Comments
…his request for more time is just about "decency."
… Someone else can go after this one.
this is awesome. if they win this mean SII banned.
Preliminary injunction? Would this not be a permanent injunction?
Decency? Really? You've just been found guilty of $1 Billion (note Carl Sagan like emphasis) worth of infringement, and now you ask for decency?
Boom! What's that mushroom cloud I see? Looks Thermonuclear to me... You getting all this Google?! Android's next...
The really sad thing about this is that Apple gets 5 days to draft its motion (2 of them on a weekend), then Samsung gets 14 days to draft their motion while Apple only gets 2 days to respond - yet Samsung is whining about decency.
So Apple gets 5 business days and Samsung gets 10.
Decency, indeed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rot'nApple
Boom! What's that mushroom cloud I see? Looks Thermonuclear to me... You getting all this Google?! Android's next...
ba ha ha ha ha ha ha ha....
BOOOOOOOM
Is probably the sound more likely ringing in the ears of SAMESUNG and it's Pimp - Google!
YOU'RE ASS JUST GOT SOUNDLY
NUKED!
If I were Apple, I'd want Scamscum to write me that $1.05B check right now. If they don't, interest charges start on day one. Want to appeal? Sure, go right ahead but that money is due NOW.
When you lose the appeal (and Samescum will lose) then we can tack on attorney's fees too.
This is a happy day, and regardless of the whining, kicking-and-screaming that Samsung is doing right now, it is a good day for the consumer. Finally, a message is sent to the world that you better make your own stuff and not copy someone else's.
Let's see what Samsung creates next. However, just like the GS3, they are already b!tching that it is created by "lawyers" so it doesn't look like an iPhone.
http://www.fosspatents.com
It's odd, though, how he can argue that it's not thermonuclear even if the judgement is upheld on appeal. He says that even if the judgment is upheld and Apple gets and injunction and Samsung has to redesign everything, it's not thermonuclear.
WTF? Apple wins over a billion dollars (possibly more because it was willful). Apple gets a ban on a wide range of Samsung products. Samsung has to redesign most of the rest of their products in a way that will be less appealing to consumers. And that's not thermonuclear? What would it take?
Quote:
Originally Posted by logandigges
this is awesome. if they win this mean SII banned.
Means the Samsung buy 1 get another phone free like the SII will get modified.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta
Here's the summary on Foss Patents - you know, the site that googleguy used to like quoting all the time:
http://www.fosspatents.com
It's odd, though, how he can argue that it's not thermonuclear even if the judgement is upheld on appeal. He says that even if the judgment is upheld and Apple gets and injunction and Samsung has to redesign everything, it's not thermonuclear.
WTF? Apple wins over a billion dollars (possibly more because it was willful). Apple gets a ban on a wide range of Samsung products. Samsung has to redesign most of the rest of their products in a way that will be less appealing to consumers. And that's not thermonuclear? What would it take?
He just means they are not locked out of US market and this is just the beginning of the fight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff1741
Preliminary injunction? Would this not be a permanent injunction?
It's preliminary until there is an actual trial to determine of it should be permanent.
I think it's going to be a long cold winter for Samsung this Christmas season. Nyuk! Nyuk! Nyuk! Nyuk!
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta
The really sad thing about this is that Apple gets 5 days to draft its motion (2 of them on a weekend), then Samsung gets 14 days to draft their motion while Apple only gets 2 days to respond - yet Samsung is whining about decency.
So Apple gets 5 business days and Samsung gets 10.
Decency, indeed.
Apple's motion will be based on Fact. You need a lot longer to think up a good lie.
I hope apple wins injunctions against all of the infringe products and that Samsung has to deal with that for the next several years of the appeal process.
If samsung is so innovative they should have no trouble creating something new and original to compete with. Microsoft did. That would be good for customers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff1741
Preliminary injunction? Would this not be a permanent injunction?
It's how the system works.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta
The really sad thing about this is that Apple gets 5 days to draft its motion (2 of them on a weekend), then Samsung gets 14 days to draft their motion while Apple only gets 2 days to respond - yet Samsung is whining about decency.
So Apple gets 5 business days and Samsung gets 10.
Decency, indeed.
Samsung was always about double standards.