In any case, I want it to go to the battery. Anything would probably be better than the drop off from 4 to 4S…
… I just noticed you're in my basement.
tallest skil wrote: » In any case, I want it to go to the battery. Anything would probably be better than the drop off from 4 to 4S… … I just noticed you're in my basement.
Indeed. And hopefully using the most recent of LTE chips will make that aspect something…
What am I even saying, of course it is. That's why Apple didn't add LTE three years ago when idiots were! They waited for these chips specifically.
Comments
Originally Posted by MacBook Pro
The additional space; therefore, is attributable to the use of 28 nm or 32 nm process technology.
In any case, I want it to go to the battery. Anything would probably be better than the drop off from 4 to 4S…
… I just noticed you're in my basement.
The battery doesn't seem significantly larger based on rumored data. I hope the change to 28 nm and 32 nm process technology will benefit users.
Like Steve Jobs, I am second to no one.
Originally Posted by MacBook Pro
The battery doesn't seem significantly larger based on rumored data. I hope the change to 28 nm and 32 nm process technology will benefit users.
Indeed. And hopefully using the most recent of LTE chips will make that aspect something…
What am I even saying, of course it is. That's why Apple didn't add LTE three years ago when idiots were! They waited for these chips specifically.