Do you not know about VoLTE? That's what Apple is doing. When Verizon turns VoLTE on, Apple will have done with two antennas what everyone else takes three to do. The existing CDMA+LTE data+voice is a stopgap solution.
Apparently the person to whom you are responding has no clue of what he speaks.
Well, I dunno; he could be right. I don't know if he's right, it just goes against everything I've read about CDMA… ever. And if what he's saying is the case, why didn't they do it five years ago with all phones?
Well, I dunno; he could be right. I don't know if he's right, it just goes against everything I've read about CDMA… ever. And if what he's saying is the case, why didn't they do it five years ago with all phones?
Well, I dunno; he could be right. I don't know if he's right, it just goes against everything I've read about CDMA… ever. And if what he's saying is the case, why didn't they do it five years ago with all phones?
I didn't read his posts. I read your responses to his posts. I have a liberal policy toward blocking members.
He is technically correct, the Sprint HD Voice service (CDMA 1X Advanced technology over Qualcomm's EVRC-NW (Enhanced Variable Rate Codec – Narrowband-Wideband) codec) does allow simultaneous voice and data transmission. The issue is that Sprint has a single smartphone, the HTC Evo 4G LTE supports HD Voice in a few markets and both mobile phones must be HD Voice enabled.
I will repeat that just to be clear. Both users must be using the HTC Evo 4G LTE smartphone and they must be in one of a few markets (Atlanta, Baltimore, Dallas, Houston, Kansas City and San Antonio).
This is why I laugh when people complain that Apple moves too slow. The Sprint HD Voice solution is the most ridiculous solution ever devised although the solution will eventually make a reasonable failover solution from LTE which is the primary motivation for Sprint since they are co-deploying the solution with LTE.
Comments
Apparently the person to whom you are responding has no clue of what he speaks.
http://www.apple.com/iphone/videos/#tv-ads-thumbs
PCMag says otherwise:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2410034,00.asp
Originally Posted by MacBook Pro
Apparently the person to whom you are responding has no clue of what he speaks.
Well, I dunno; he could be right. I don't know if he's right, it just goes against everything I've read about CDMA… ever. And if what he's saying is the case, why didn't they do it five years ago with all phones?
I didn't read his posts. I read your responses to his posts. I have a liberal policy toward blocking members.
He is technically correct, the Sprint HD Voice service (CDMA 1X Advanced technology over Qualcomm's EVRC-NW (Enhanced Variable Rate Codec – Narrowband-Wideband) codec) does allow simultaneous voice and data transmission. The issue is that Sprint has a single smartphone, the HTC Evo 4G LTE supports HD Voice in a few markets and both mobile phones must be HD Voice enabled.
I will repeat that just to be clear. Both users must be using the HTC Evo 4G LTE smartphone and they must be in one of a few markets (Atlanta, Baltimore, Dallas, Houston, Kansas City and San Antonio).
This is why I laugh when people complain that Apple moves too slow. The Sprint HD Voice solution is the most ridiculous solution ever devised although the solution will eventually make a reasonable failover solution from LTE which is the primary motivation for Sprint since they are co-deploying the solution with LTE.