(Actually, **** Ferrari, nothing beats a class s65 amg type of thing.)
Unless you like control to go along with the power. If, however, you prefer spinning off like a scalded kitten every time you punch the throttle, then by all means, go with the Merc.
I was thinking it would the other way and we'd see a Ferrari that's a rectangle with rounded corners, complete with similar shaped steering wheel, console switches, dials, and buttons, and of course the rims and tires have to have the same shape too.
Steering wheel?! That's SO 2009! Now we lean to steer. Default will be lean right to turn left, which you'll have to go into preferences to change.
Should be interesting as G-force pushes the driver, thus tightening the turning ratio, which then increases the G-force further which tightens the turn even further until the cycle makes drivers with poor core strength spin out!
Unless you like control to go along with the power. If, however, you prefer spinning off like a scalded kitten every time you punch the throttle, then by all means, go with the Merc.
The Merc is... there's no words for that masterpiece. The "perfect" car?
Actually I think Ferrari would be s good company to start with due to the low volume of cars sold and the buyers aren't really price sensitive. Use this to get something working and once perfected roll it out to volume producers like a VW. Develop in the classes and once perfected roll it out to the masses. Then keep repeating this development and marketing method over and over
Eddy Cue, Apple's head of Internet software and services, has joined the Ferrari board of directors, in a move that could hint that Apple is interested in making devices for users' vehicles.
The stupidity of Kasper showing again. You'd think there were similar rumors at Avon when Andrea joined Apple? The nonsense in this articles' first sentence baffles me.
Comments
Quote:
Originally Posted by pedromartins
(Actually, **** Ferrari, nothing beats a class s65 amg type of thing.)
Unless you like control to go along with the power. If, however, you prefer spinning off like a scalded kitten every time you punch the throttle, then by all means, go with the Merc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OriginalG
I was thinking it would the other way and we'd see a Ferrari that's a rectangle with rounded corners, complete with similar shaped steering wheel, console switches, dials, and buttons, and of course the rims and tires have to have the same shape too.
Steering wheel?! That's SO 2009! Now we lean to steer. Default will be lean right to turn left, which you'll have to go into preferences to change.
Should be interesting as G-force pushes the driver, thus tightening the turning ratio, which then increases the G-force further which tightens the turn even further until the cycle makes drivers with poor core strength spin out!
Quote:
Originally Posted by v5v
Unless you like control to go along with the power. If, however, you prefer spinning off like a scalded kitten every time you punch the throttle, then by all means, go with the Merc.
The Merc is... there's no words for that masterpiece. The "perfect" car?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pedromartins
The Merc is... there's no words for that masterpiece. The "perfect" car?
Well sure. To be "perfect" a car should let you experience it in every direction -- not just forwards but sideways and backwards, too, right?
You pipped me, but don't forget about this...
Actually I think Ferrari would be s good company to start with due to the low volume of cars sold and the buyers aren't really price sensitive. Use this to get something working and once perfected roll it out to volume producers like a VW. Develop in the classes and once perfected roll it out to the masses. Then keep repeating this development and marketing method over and over
The stupidity of Kasper showing again. You'd think there were similar rumors at Avon when Andrea joined Apple? The nonsense in this articles' first sentence baffles me.