Inside Iris: What Intel's new integrated graphics mean for Apple's future Macs

2

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 49
    wakefinancewakefinance Posts: 855member
    I'm excited about this! Thinner and lighter Macbooks will be even more impressive. My MBP isn't retina so I don't even get to enjoy the current size of the rMBP but I know what a difference there already is and imagine that the difference will be even greater by the time I upgrade.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 49
    Um, iris - retina...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 49
    darkdefenderdarkdefender Posts: 168member
    Why doesn't Intel stick to Processors and leave AMD and Nvidia stick to Graphics... now people will have to pay more for having something they won't even use because most likely we'll put better gpu cards in them anyways. And AMD is now starting to make tablets while Nvdia is still the most overpriced GPU vendor out there.

    All of these companies suck. AMD sucking the least. Nvidia the most.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 49
    chabigchabig Posts: 641member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by darkdefender View Post



    Why doesn't Intel stick to Processors and leave AMD and Nvidia stick to Graphics...


    And while we're at it, let's leave networking to dedicated 3COM cards, and let's bring back the dedicated clock chip, and serial interface boards. Come on, things have always been getting more integrated. There is every reason to put good graphics on board the CPU die. Yes, Intel has lagged badly in graphics performance, but they're catching up. These are the first GPUs to really rival discrete chips.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 49
    MacPromacpro Posts: 19,873member
    I see what he did there.

    I know, it was really very funny.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 49
    analogjackanalogjack Posts: 1,073member
    Clever name that leverages the "retina" glow and is also an anagram of 'Siri'
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 49
    chris_cachris_ca Posts: 2,543member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Marvin View Post





    I think they could have picked a more masculine name though


    Raw Metal or FireStorm...


    or Hank.


    image

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 49
    mcarlingmcarling Posts: 1,106member
    If I'm reading this correctly, the 2013 MacBook Air will have better integrated graphics than the 13" 2012 MacBook Pro.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 29 of 49
    analogjackanalogjack Posts: 1,073member
    mcarling wrote: »
    If I'm reading this correctly, the 2013 MacBook Air will have better integrated graphics than the 13" 2012 MacBook Pro.

    Welp, the 680mx in the current imac is better that the gpu in the current mac pro.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 30 of 49
    netroxnetrox Posts: 1,551member
    I am extremely excited! I want to see it happen in Mac Mini, I don't care about notebooks or iMacs... it's Mac Mini I want to know.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 31 of 49
    maclancermaclancer Posts: 49member
    netrox wrote: »
    I am extremely excited! I want to see it happen in Mac Mini, I don't care about notebooks or iMacs... it's Mac Mini I want to know.
    Me too, i want to know if the upgraded mac mini will come on June as well.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 32 of 49
    75X better than an EXTREMELY crappy GPU isn't proof it's a good GPU.

    Perhaps if Intel put a data point or two as to how it compares to ATI or Nvidia GPU's of say, 1 or 2 years ago.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 33 of 49
    misamisa Posts: 827member
    chabig wrote: »
    And while we're at it, let's leave networking to dedicated 3COM cards, and let's bring back the dedicated clock chip, and serial interface boards. Come on, things have always been getting more integrated. There is every reason to put good graphics on board the CPU die. Yes, Intel has lagged badly in graphics performance, but they're catching up. These are the first GPUs to really rival discrete chips.

    Intel has not been lagging since the HD graphics 2000, and I mean this ever-so-tongue-in-cheek way. The 2000 part is equal to garbage onboard offerings by nVidia and AMD. The 4000 part is roughly equal to GeForce 9700M GTS/Radeon HD 7520G which is an onboard low-end part.

    http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/common_gpus.html

    The HD4000 on that list is still only 1/3rd the power of a mid-level video card, and 1/10th the power of a high-but-not-SLI configuration card. If the HD5000 or Iris part really is 10x the previous generation card, then it should easily be equivalent of a Radeon 78xx or GTX 470. I some how doubt Intel's marketing is going to deliver on this.

    Marvin wrote: »
    I think they could have picked a more masculine name though. This is just setting things up for NVidia. Iris is a girl's name (and a flower). GeForce / Radeon / Titan / FirePro are slightly more symbolic of raw unadulterated power. I just hope Intel's roadmap doesn't have Daisy and Dandelion in it. Their GT3 name gives a better impression of the performance.

    What? Of all the stupid things someone could say, someone complains it's not a manly enough name? Get real. It's thinking like that which gives us such crappy PC computers labeled as boy-toys.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 34 of 49
    ksecksec Posts: 1,569member


    Its the drivers that matters. Good things is Drivers Development is on Apple's Court, Bad things is Apple doesn't tend to care about gaming as much.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 35 of 49
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Originally Posted by Misa View Post

    What? Of all the stupid things someone could say, someone complains it's not a manly enough name? Get real. It's thinking like that which gives us such crappy PC computers labeled as boy-toys.


     


    What's more imposing: Firebird or Minnow? Midas or Susan? Bordeaux or Mr. Coffee?

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 36 of 49
    kiltedgreenkiltedgreen Posts: 651member


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Marvin View Post





    I think they could have picked a more masculine name though. This is just setting things up for NVidia. Iris is a girl's name (and a flower). GeForce / Radeon / Titan / FirePro are slightly more symbolic of raw unadulterated power. I just hope Intel's roadmap doesn't have Daisy and Dandelion in it. Their GT3 name gives a better impression of the performance.


     



    Ye gods! It's bad enough that manufacturers give things with engines and guns on/in them aimed at men names like "Marauder", "Thrust", "Intimidator", "Vanquish" and similar violent associations without you encouraging them even more. It just perpetuates the whole "man - strong, powerful, active", "woman - pretty, passive, domestic" lie that's been distorting human relations for far too long already.


     


    Take shower gel - a mixture of petroleum byproducts plus perfume - and market them at women. They look like this and sound like this "A shower gel that cleanses your skin with mildness and sheathes your body in the ultra-feminine, sensual scent of SO ELIXIR."


     


    Take shower gel - a mixture of petroleum byproducts plus perfume - and market them at men. They look like this and sound like this "Lynx Cool Metal Fine Quartz + Zinc Shower Gel keeps you mentally and physically prepared for any situation – so you don’t waste any time worrying about staying cool."


     


    I bet I know which combination of petroleum byproducts you have in your bathroom ...


     


    And I expect the Intel chip name is related to the Iris of the eye, in the same way that Apple chose Aperture for the eye/camera associations. I mean they're not going to name it after a girly flower are they as it could affront their ma(i)n customer demographic!

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 37 of 49
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Originally Posted by KiltedGreen View Post

    [post]


     


    Quit gumming up the thread with this nonsense, please. You want to talk about it, do it in PoliticalOutsider.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 38 of 49
    foljsfoljs Posts: 390member
    I think they could have picked a more masculine name though. This is just setting things up for NVidia. Iris is a girl's name (and a flower). GeForce / Radeon / Titan / FirePro are slightly more symbolic of raw unadulterated power. I just hope Intel's roadmap doesn't have Daisy and Dandelion in it. Their GT3 name gives a better impression of the performance.

    More masculine name? Are you like 13 years old, with this "Iris is for girls, ewww" reaction and all?

    Besides, Iris is from the human iris (of the eye). It's similar to the "Retina" name.

    And a bad-ass Silicon Graphics workstation back in the day was called Iris.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 39 of 49
    vorsosvorsos Posts: 302member


    jragosta View Post



    nagromme View Post

    I don't care what's integrated vs. separate, or even about specs and benchmarks... just show me real world frames-per-second tests in actual apps. If sufficient speed is there, I'll be happy no matter what logo is on the chip.




    Why? Frames per second is only relevant for games and a few very heavy duty apps. People using those apps are probably going to use the MBP with discrete graphics, anyway.


    Raw computational power is still relevant for video editing and similar tasks.


     

    Tallest Skil View Post



    KiltedGreen View Post

    [post]


    Quit gumming up the thread with this nonsense, please. You want to talk about it, do it in PoliticalOutsider.



    Oh look, several pages of discussing the next OS X brand name. This is no different.


    IMO macho branding has no effect on me, and doesn't make much sense for computer technology anyway. You'll sell more comically oversized pickup trucks with cock-themed names and features (power stroke diesel, Hummer), but that's worlds apart from the demographics of your average graphics card enthusiast.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 40 of 49
    bigpicsbigpics Posts: 1,397member


    Quote:



    Originally Posted by Marvin View Post





    I think they could have picked a more masculine name though. This is just setting things up for NVidia. Iris is a girl's name (and a flower). GeForce / Radeon / Titan / FirePro are slightly more symbolic of raw unadulterated power. I just hope Intel's roadmap doesn't have Daisy and Dandelion in it. Their GT3 name gives a better impression of the performance.


     


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by KiltedGreen View Post




     


    Ye gods! It's bad enough that manufacturers give things with engines and guns on/in them aimed at men names like "Marauder", "Thrust", "Intimidator", "Vanquish" and similar violent associations without you encouraging them even more. It just perpetuates the whole "man - strong, powerful, active", "woman - pretty, passive, domestic" lie that's been distorting human relations for far too long already.


     


    Take shower gel - a mixture of petroleum byproducts plus perfume - and market them at women. They look like this and sound like this "A shower gel that cleanses your skin with mildness and sheathes your body in the ultra-feminine, sensual scent of SO ELIXIR."


     


    Take shower gel - a mixture of petroleum byproducts plus perfume - and market them at men. They look like this and sound like this "Lynx Cool Metal Fine Quartz + Zinc Shower Gel keeps you mentally and physically prepared for any situation – so you don’t waste any time worrying about staying cool."


     


    I bet I know which combination of petroleum byproducts you have in your bathroom ...


     


    And I expect the Intel chip name is related to the Iris of the eye, in the same way that Apple chose Aperture for the eye/camera associations. I mean they're not going to name it after a girly flower are they as it could affront their ma(i)n customer demographic!



     


    A chart comparing a number of Android phones to condom names.....



    http://techcrunch.com/2012/03/26/condom-or-android-handset-name/

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.