Post #18 started it. Quickly followed by post #19.
I responded to those unsubstantiated accusations on post #30 and the now post #37 before I used your poor reading comprehension as an example that you should check yo' self.
PS: This post is further proof of your poor reading comprehension.
lol.......here we go......thats not what you said.....
Here is your quote....again:
"3) I think you need to be more diligent in your comprehension as you gave a thumb up to ankleskater in post #28 and again to first time poster hdtc in post #37 for the exact same comment. Exact. Word for word, letter for letter, nine comments later."
So there is the truth you are so foolishly trying to cover up........even with my compromised reading skills I can read between those lines.......
I responded to that snipet from you and you did not like it...but rather childishly continue to muddy the waters with your senseless dribblle...on and on......and on......yada....yada....yada.
So where is this post #37? from YOUR quote? I don't see it. Are you a moderator? Did you delete it? Why won't you answer those questions? I have asked ity numerous times. Did you delete it?
Posts 18 and 19 started it? LOL you really need to get a life.....You got your stuff in a bunch over that? that is so childish of you! Then you tried to get back at me with post#39! You tried to tell me how I should act on a internet forum!
You know what I said was true!
If I posted a new thread with this as the title you would blast me for it:
Samsung's cash pile triples in one year, now worth $28.5B after debt
Don't even try to say you would not because in even in your truth...you know you would.
You would chastize me for doing that on a pro Apple site. Just as you tried to chastize me for giving 2 thumbs ups!
lol.......here we go......thats not what you said.....
Here is your quote....again: "3) I think you need to be more diligent in your comprehension as you gave a thumb up to ankleskater in post #28 and again to first time poster hdtc in post #37 for the exact same comment. Exact. Word for word, letter for letter, nine comments later."
So there is the truth you are so foolishly trying to cover up........even with my compromised reading skills I can read between those lines.......
I responded to that snipet from you and you did not like it...but rather childishly continue to muddy the waters with your senseless dribblle...on and on......and on......yada....yada....yada.
So where is this post #37? from YOUR quote? I don't see it. Are you a moderator? Did you delete it? Why won't you answer those questions? I have asked ity numerous times. Did you delete it?
Posts 18 and 19 started it? LOL you really need to get a life.....You got your stuff in a bunch over that? that is so childish of you! Then you tried to get back at me with post#39! You tried to tell me how I should act on a internet forum! :no:
You know what I said was true!
If I posted a new thread with this as the title you would blast me for it:
<h1 class="forum-h1" id="user_yui_3_7_3_1_1368047761112_767">Samsung's cash pile triples in one year, now worth $28.5B after debt</h1>
Don't even try to say you would not because in even in your truth...you know you would.
You would chastize me for doing that on a pro Apple site. Just as you tried to chastize me for giving 2 thumbs ups!
Lets see you try to deny that! :no:
That was point 3 of 3 as an example of your post reading comprehension, which came only after several posts detailing how your comments in post #18 and #19 were incorrect. Your attempts to ignore posts #18 and #19, and my original comment at post #30 are clear to everyone who has read this thread.
I thought your attack on TS the other day was an isolated incident but you continually fail to be reasonable or admit when you're wrong. For instance, when you stated in post #19 that " we would get BLASTED for doing so...." in regards to mentioning Samsung favourably, which I did earlier in this thread. Where are the attacks on me for doing so? Where are the attacks on me for suggesting that even Apple will strategically stuff a channel when it's apropos? Where are the attacks on me for showing that Apple and Samsung likely use very similar tactics when it comes to their popular, high-end products?
Sure, it does happens and will continue to happen but if you at try to make balanced comment where you attempt to think about the bigger picture you may not find yourself making these all-or-nothing comments that you can't defend so you take to childish tactics by ignoring what I wrote in post #30 in regards to you inciteful comments in post #18 and #19.
PS: Yet another example of your poor reading comprehension is your odd questions regarding me being a mod (which is clear that I'm not) and if I deleted the spam (which is clear that I could not), which is even more perplexing after your earlier statement suggesting that I didn't report it (which I had already done), all of which should have have cued you in later on that I was not a mod not able to report it. I fear that you really don't see how foolish your line of questioning is or you backed yourself into a hole back in post #18.
PPS: "Just as you tried to chastize me for giving 2 thumbs ups!" You're either a really sore loser or just acting like a loser. This goes well beyond your intelligence here. Shame on you!
That was point 3 of 3 as an example of your post reading comprehension, which came only after several posts detailing how your comments in post #18 and #19 were incorrect. Your attempts to ignore posts #18 and #19, and my original comment at post #30 are clear to everyone who has read this thread.
I thought your attack on TS the other day was an isolated incident but you continually fail to be reasonable or admit when you're wrong. For instance, when you stated in post #19 that " we would get BLASTED for doing so...." in regards to mentioning Samsung favourably, which I did earlier in this thread. Where are the attacks on me for doing so? Where are the attacks on me for suggesting that even Apple will strategically stuff a channel when it's apropos? Where are the attacks on me for showing that Apple and Samsung likely use very similar tactics when it comes to their popular, high-end products?
Sure, it does happens and will continue to happen but if you at try to make balanced comment where you attempt to think about the bigger picture you may not find yourself making these all-or-nothing comments that you can't defend so you take to childish tactics by ignoring what I wrote in post #30 in regards to you inciteful comments in post #18 and #19.
PS: Yet another example of your poor reading comprehension is your odd questions regarding me being a mod (which is clear that I'm not) and if I deleted the spam (which is clear that I could not), which is even more perplexing after your earlier statement suggesting that I didn't report it (which I had already done), all of which should have have cued you in later on that I was not a mod not able to report it. I fear that you really don't see how foolish your line of questioning is or you backed yourself into a hole back in post #18.
PPS: "Just as you tried to chastize me for giving 2 thumbs ups!" You're either a really sore loser or just acting like a loser. This goes well beyond your intelligence here. Shame on you!
Now....we get to the REAL reason you have been attacking me this whole thread. You are misguidedly responding to a slight your thought I gave Tallest Skil. Can he not defend himself? Do you always defend him...i see you defend him all the time in post. Someone will ask him to clarify some one line statement and you respond for TS and clarify the statement for him. Don't deny it...you do it all the time. If there is something between me an TS it is NONE of your business. I think he is an adult and can take care of himself....strange he hasn't posted all day.......
I asked about being a moderator because the post you quoted (#37) doesn't seem to exist. Where did it go? You complained about it and it is gone......hmmmm
You are lying if you are saying you would not have issue and complain if someone posted this same subject and content on their own! Shame on you for trying mislead everyone! But I guess you are too busy trying to get back at me for something you perceived i did to TS! Shame shame shame.....how childish and juvenile of you!
You still don't read so well.....your reading comprehension is not up to par. I never said you have not said anything pro or con about Samsung......never. But you feel the need to bring that up for some reason. so let me make it clear......
IF I WAS THE THREAD STARTER FOR THIS THREAD YOU WOULD HAVE GIVEN ME A VERY HARD TIME FOR PASTING PRO SAMSUNG INFORMATION ON AI...... IF I POSTED HOW WELL THEY ARE DOING AND HOW MUCH POSITIVE GROWTH AND HOW THEY ARE CATCHING UP TO APPLE (LONG WAY TO GO) YOU AND PRETTY MUCH EVERYONE HERE ON AI WOULD NOT APPRECIATE IT AND WOULD LET THAT BE KNOWN. If you say anything contrary to that then you are a bold face liar. Its is funny how you denied that you were sticking up fro TS the other day. But you seem to have the need to defend him. Even he doesn't speak up but you do.....
PS I used to disagree with you but always had respect for you.....I think it is safe to sy that no longer exists.
PPS: Just admit you were wrong in your posts.......you know it and everyone reading this tirade of yours knows it too. You just come off as childish now.....
But at least we now know what your true motives are......
I'd like to know how much of Sammy's profits came from making parts for Apple.
In the middle of 2012, reports were saying that Apple accounted for 7.5% - 8.8% of Samsung's Semiconductor business.... made up of purchasing displays, memory, and CPUs.
(Samsung's next highest customer was HP, at 3.2%, btw.)
Six months later, by the end of 2012, the picture was a bit different. Apple had only spent about 3/4 of the earlier predicted amount on parts, and Samsung had jumped ahead of Apple as the world's largest parts consumer. So Samsung might've become its own best customer.
The biggest hit seemed to be with Apple dropping Samsung for displays, which no doubt helped lower that subdivision's revenues by about 8%.
As for CPUs, I think that Apple still uses Samsung to make those to the tune of about $2B a year, or about 10% of that subdivision's revenues, IIRC.
Comments
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX
Liar liar pants on fire!
Post #18 started it. Quickly followed by post #19.
I responded to those unsubstantiated accusations on post #30 and the now post #37 before I used your poor reading comprehension as an example that you should check yo' self.
PS: This post is further proof of your poor reading comprehension.
lol.......here we go......thats not what you said.....
Here is your quote....again:
"3) I think you need to be more diligent in your comprehension as you gave a thumb up to ankleskater in post #28 and again to first time poster hdtc in post #37 for the exact same comment. Exact. Word for word, letter for letter, nine comments later."
So there is the truth you are so foolishly trying to cover up........even with my compromised reading skills I can read between those lines.......
I responded to that snipet from you and you did not like it...but rather childishly continue to muddy the waters with your senseless dribblle...on and on......and on......yada....yada....yada.
So where is this post #37? from YOUR quote? I don't see it. Are you a moderator? Did you delete it? Why won't you answer those questions? I have asked ity numerous times. Did you delete it?
Posts 18 and 19 started it? LOL you really need to get a life.....You got your stuff in a bunch over that? that is so childish of you! Then you tried to get back at me with post#39! You tried to tell me how I should act on a internet forum!
You know what I said was true!
If I posted a new thread with this as the title you would blast me for it:
Samsung's cash pile triples in one year, now worth $28.5B after debt
Don't even try to say you would not because in even in your truth...you know you would.
You would chastize me for doing that on a pro Apple site. Just as you tried to chastize me for giving 2 thumbs ups!
Lets see you try to deny that!
That was point 3 of 3 as an example of your post reading comprehension, which came only after several posts detailing how your comments in post #18 and #19 were incorrect. Your attempts to ignore posts #18 and #19, and my original comment at post #30 are clear to everyone who has read this thread.
I thought your attack on TS the other day was an isolated incident but you continually fail to be reasonable or admit when you're wrong. For instance, when you stated in post #19 that " we would get BLASTED for doing so...." in regards to mentioning Samsung favourably, which I did earlier in this thread. Where are the attacks on me for doing so? Where are the attacks on me for suggesting that even Apple will strategically stuff a channel when it's apropos? Where are the attacks on me for showing that Apple and Samsung likely use very similar tactics when it comes to their popular, high-end products?
Sure, it does happens and will continue to happen but if you at try to make balanced comment where you attempt to think about the bigger picture you may not find yourself making these all-or-nothing comments that you can't defend so you take to childish tactics by ignoring what I wrote in post #30 in regards to you inciteful comments in post #18 and #19.
PS: Yet another example of your poor reading comprehension is your odd questions regarding me being a mod (which is clear that I'm not) and if I deleted the spam (which is clear that I could not), which is even more perplexing after your earlier statement suggesting that I didn't report it (which I had already done), all of which should have have cued you in later on that I was not a mod not able to report it. I fear that you really don't see how foolish your line of questioning is or you backed yourself into a hole back in post #18.
PPS: "Just as you tried to chastize me for giving 2 thumbs ups!" You're either a really sore loser or just acting like a loser. This goes well beyond your intelligence here. Shame on you!
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX
That was point 3 of 3 as an example of your post reading comprehension, which came only after several posts detailing how your comments in post #18 and #19 were incorrect. Your attempts to ignore posts #18 and #19, and my original comment at post #30 are clear to everyone who has read this thread.
I thought your attack on TS the other day was an isolated incident but you continually fail to be reasonable or admit when you're wrong. For instance, when you stated in post #19 that " we would get BLASTED for doing so...." in regards to mentioning Samsung favourably, which I did earlier in this thread. Where are the attacks on me for doing so? Where are the attacks on me for suggesting that even Apple will strategically stuff a channel when it's apropos? Where are the attacks on me for showing that Apple and Samsung likely use very similar tactics when it comes to their popular, high-end products?
Sure, it does happens and will continue to happen but if you at try to make balanced comment where you attempt to think about the bigger picture you may not find yourself making these all-or-nothing comments that you can't defend so you take to childish tactics by ignoring what I wrote in post #30 in regards to you inciteful comments in post #18 and #19.
PS: Yet another example of your poor reading comprehension is your odd questions regarding me being a mod (which is clear that I'm not) and if I deleted the spam (which is clear that I could not), which is even more perplexing after your earlier statement suggesting that I didn't report it (which I had already done), all of which should have have cued you in later on that I was not a mod not able to report it. I fear that you really don't see how foolish your line of questioning is or you backed yourself into a hole back in post #18.
PPS: "Just as you tried to chastize me for giving 2 thumbs ups!" You're either a really sore loser or just acting like a loser. This goes well beyond your intelligence here. Shame on you!
Now....we get to the REAL reason you have been attacking me this whole thread. You are misguidedly responding to a slight your thought I gave Tallest Skil. Can he not defend himself? Do you always defend him...i see you defend him all the time in post. Someone will ask him to clarify some one line statement and you respond for TS and clarify the statement for him. Don't deny it...you do it all the time. If there is something between me an TS it is NONE of your business. I think he is an adult and can take care of himself....strange he hasn't posted all day.......
I asked about being a moderator because the post you quoted (#37) doesn't seem to exist. Where did it go? You complained about it and it is gone......hmmmm
You are lying if you are saying you would not have issue and complain if someone posted this same subject and content on their own! Shame on you for trying mislead everyone! But I guess you are too busy trying to get back at me for something you perceived i did to TS! Shame shame shame.....how childish and juvenile of you!
You still don't read so well.....your reading comprehension is not up to par. I never said you have not said anything pro or con about Samsung......never. But you feel the need to bring that up for some reason. so let me make it clear......
IF I WAS THE THREAD STARTER FOR THIS THREAD YOU WOULD HAVE GIVEN ME A VERY HARD TIME FOR PASTING PRO SAMSUNG INFORMATION ON AI...... IF I POSTED HOW WELL THEY ARE DOING AND HOW MUCH POSITIVE GROWTH AND HOW THEY ARE CATCHING UP TO APPLE (LONG WAY TO GO) YOU AND PRETTY MUCH EVERYONE HERE ON AI WOULD NOT APPRECIATE IT AND WOULD LET THAT BE KNOWN. If you say anything contrary to that then you are a bold face liar. Its is funny how you denied that you were sticking up fro TS the other day. But you seem to have the need to defend him. Even he doesn't speak up but you do.....
PS I used to disagree with you but always had respect for you.....I think it is safe to sy that no longer exists.
PPS: Just admit you were wrong in your posts.......you know it and everyone reading this tirade of yours knows it too. You just come off as childish now.....
But at least we now know what your true motives are......
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCProfessor
I'd like to know how much of Sammy's profits came from making parts for Apple.
In the middle of 2012, reports were saying that Apple accounted for 7.5% - 8.8% of Samsung's Semiconductor business.... made up of purchasing displays, memory, and CPUs.
(Samsung's next highest customer was HP, at 3.2%, btw.)
Six months later, by the end of 2012, the picture was a bit different. Apple had only spent about 3/4 of the earlier predicted amount on parts, and Samsung had jumped ahead of Apple as the world's largest parts consumer. So Samsung might've become its own best customer.
The biggest hit seemed to be with Apple dropping Samsung for displays, which no doubt helped lower that subdivision's revenues by about 8%.
As for CPUs, I think that Apple still uses Samsung to make those to the tune of about $2B a year, or about 10% of that subdivision's revenues, IIRC.
Anyone with more, later figures, please jump in.