DED should apologize for this hyperbolic nonsense-filled article. He never gave a moment of thought to the possibility Apple would be handed a middling win and Samsung would be handed an even lesser win. Patent owners should be alarmed at the indifference displayed by this jury, IMO.
What an embarrassment for Apple. Maybe now they will stop suing and try to become an innovator once again. They are quickly losing market share in the iPhone and iPad market to Samsung, and holding their on in the PC space. Either they get back to creating new things or sometime in the future we will be using Apple in the same sentence as Blackberry. So sad to watch this decline.
Everyone can continue to bash Samsung but from everything I read Samsung has diversified into many businesses; Construction, Heavy Industries, Healthcare, Medical Centers, Insurance, Finance, Automobiles, Ship building, cameras, appliances, Tel-com, in addition to their electronics and manufacturing superiority.
DED should apologize for this hyperbolic nonsense-filled article. He never gave a moment of thought to the possibility Apple would be handed a middling win and Samsung would be handed an even lesser win. Patent owners should be alarmed at the indifference displayed by this jury, IMO.
DED should apologize for this hyperbolic nonsense-filled article. He never gave a moment of thought to the possibility Apple would be handed a middling win and Samsung would be handed an even lesser win. Patent owners should be alarmed at the indifference displayed by this jury, IMO.
With tech patent disputes, getting a savvy enough jury that understands the scope and damage of copying will be damn near impossible.
Comments
I liked the first one and thought the second one was ok. I had a lot of issues with it.
After that verdict and that award- this article is nonsense.
This article described exactly what the potential verdicts were and why.
There are two variables still in play that it outlines.
I did too. Really good development of the back-story without going too far with it IMO.
Everyone can continue to bash Samsung but from everything I read Samsung has diversified into many businesses; Construction, Heavy Industries, Healthcare, Medical Centers, Insurance, Finance, Automobiles, Ship building, cameras, appliances, Tel-com, in addition to their electronics and manufacturing superiority.
https://www.shi.samsung.co.kr/Eng/
Apple: consumer gadgets.
DED should apologize for this hyperbolic nonsense-filled article. He never gave a moment of thought to the possibility Apple would be handed a middling win and Samsung would be handed an even lesser win. Patent owners should be alarmed at the indifference displayed by this jury, IMO.
Try reading the article before commenting.
With tech patent disputes, getting a savvy enough jury that understands the scope and damage of copying will be damn near impossible.
I think the presenting attorneys would have to waste far too much time explaining how patent law works before presenting their case.