MacWorld in New York - 2002 is Apple's year

1151618202131

Comments

  • Reply 341 of 619
    blizaineblizaine Posts: 239member
    Hmmm....





    [Thoughtbubble] Maybe if I bump this thread, Dorsal will be able to find it easier and post some more info... [/Thoughtbubble]





    oooorrrr, maybe not
  • Reply 342 of 619
    dorsal mdorsal m Posts: 15member
    All in good time.
  • Reply 343 of 619
    leonisleonis Posts: 3,427member
    [quote]Originally posted by Dorsal M:

    <strong>All in good time.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
  • Reply 344 of 619
    sizzle chestsizzle chest Posts: 1,133member
    If that's not proof that he's toying with AI in a Kormac-like fashion, I don't know what is.
  • Reply 345 of 619
    macroninmacronin Posts: 1,174member
    Now that was just plain wrong Dorsal M...!



    <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" /> Maya for Mac OS X <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" />
  • Reply 346 of 619
    macjedaimacjedai Posts: 263member
    [quote]Originally posted by Dorsal M:

    <strong>All in good time.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Dorsal, ya disappoint me. No word at all would have been better. Not to get nasty, but are you becoming a "troll artist" now? String'n us along, and laugh'n all the way. Or is there some "legit" reason for say'n "All in good time". "Times a runn'n out ... ya burn'n daylight, Boy!"
  • Reply 347 of 619
    iq78iq78 Posts: 256member
    [quote]Originally posted by Programmer:

    <strong>



    Why the skepticism about France? AMD's monster fab is in Germany...</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Oh, man.... ouch. Did somebody just imply that French engineering/manufactoring is comparable to German engineering/manufactoring?



    Pegeot.... Mercedes.... Renault..... Porsche....

    Cameca..... Siemen's,,,,,



    I've used quite a bit of French and German engineered scientific equipment. I'll take German engineering/manufactoring. (though, when the French stuff happens to work, it's not too bad)
  • Reply 348 of 619
    screedscreed Posts: 1,077member
    [quote]<strong>Dorsal, ya disappoint me. No word at all would have been better.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Chill out lads!



    Dorsal has yet to go on the pie-in-the-sky benders that Kormac has gone.



    19 days to go.



    Is it too soon for a countdown thread?



    Screed



    [ 06-27-2002: Message edited by: sCreeD ]</p>
  • Reply 349 of 619
    programmerprogrammer Posts: 3,466member
    [quote]Originally posted by IQ78:

    <strong>Oh, man.... ouch. Did somebody just imply that French engineering/manufactoring is comparable to German engineering/manufactoring?



    Pegeot.... Mercedes.... Renault..... Porsche....

    Cameca..... Siemen's,,,,,



    I've used quite a bit of French and German engineered scientific equipment. I'll take German engineering/manufactoring. (though, when the French stuff happens to work, it's not too bad)</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I think its a serious mistake to write off any particular country's new technology efforts. Things change fast in this industry, and there is plenty of money being thrown at it. China, for example, hasn't been known for being "high tech" but now that Intel and Motorola both have huge investments there, generalizations putting down the Chinese high tech industry would be a mistake. France has had some successes, they just haven't had the huge investments necessary to be a world leader in this industry -- that may be changing. The USA's strength isn't assured, either -- international snobbery is a mistake.
  • Reply 350 of 619
    [quote]Originally posted by sCreeD:

    <strong>



    Chill out lads!



    Dorsal has yet to go on the pie-in-the-sky benders that Kormac has gone.



    19 days to go.



    Is it too soon for a countdown thread?



    Screed



    [ 06-27-2002: Message edited by: sCreeD ]</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Didn't you just start one?

  • Reply 351 of 619
    iq78iq78 Posts: 256member
    [quote]Originally posted by Programmer:

    <strong>



    I think its a serious mistake to write off any particular country's new technology efforts



    .</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I agree. I really didn't mean for the message to be taken too seriously. I was just taking a cheap shot.



    But you're right, I should be careful with my harmless cheap shots, they could be mistaken as an offensive by a frenchman, resulting in an immediate surrender of all of France.



    That wouldn't be good.
  • Reply 352 of 619
    programmerprogrammer Posts: 3,466member
    [quote]Originally posted by IQ78:

    <strong>I agree. I really didn't mean for the message to be taken too seriously. I was just taking a cheap shot.



    But you're right, I should be careful with my harmless cheap shots, they could be mistaken as an offensive by a frenchman, resulting in an immediate surrender of all of France.



    That wouldn't be good.</strong><hr></blockquote>





    Careful, they may still have a guillotine or two sitting around.
  • Reply 353 of 619
    Dorsal M doesn't know anything, he's just pulling our chains.
  • Reply 354 of 619
    I'm beginning to wonder if ANYONE knows anything AT ALL. Doesn't it feel like we are all groping in the dark for a lamp, and someone like Dorsal goes, "Over here!" and we all stumble and trip in that direction for a while, until another 'helpful' person yells that they have something somewhere else.
  • Reply 355 of 619
    bigcbigc Posts: 1,224member
    It's all just wishful thinking. Ain't no harm unless you take it seriously.

    Seeing is believing (sometimes).
  • Reply 356 of 619
    addisonaddison Posts: 1,185member
    [quote]Originally posted by Dorsal M:

    <strong>All in good time.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    This isn't the 'real' Dorsal M. Look at the post count!
  • Reply 357 of 619
    lundylundy Posts: 4,466member
    [quote]Originally posted by Addison:

    <strong>



    This isn't the 'real' Dorsal M. Look at the post count!</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Yeah, it's him. The real Dorsal has 12 posts.
  • Reply 358 of 619
    Moki has a relevant post in disaster at MWNY, ( top of page 3) lending some credence to the spymac rumor, and answering some questions posted here, namely new 166 MHz bus & DDR ram. While no disaster this is less heartening than the pleasant suprise rumor.
  • Reply 359 of 619
    murkmurk Posts: 935member
    [quote]Originally posted by Dorsal M:

    <strong>All in good time.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Hurry, Dorsal?The RDF is growing weak? Don't know how?gasp?much longer?gasp?I can hold on?
  • Reply 360 of 619
    moogsmoogs Posts: 4,296member
    Maybe Dorsal M knows what he's talking about and maybe he doesn't, but one thing's for sure. JYD is bi-polar.



    One day he touts a given rumor as proof that an amazing Power Mac upgrade is coming, the next day he claims Apple is doomed. Get something through your head dude: NO ONE here has verifiable knowledge of ANYthing in terms of future Apple hardware. Therefore, the wise course of action is to not buy into any of it too much (whether its optimistic or pessimistic), and stop trying to predict Apple's future based on a friggin trade show, OK?



    Find something better to do with your time.
Sign In or Register to comment.