ray castillo wrote: »
what do y'all know about if he would be a good or bad hire for Apple? Silly boys and girls. He was just doing his job at the white house and he actually did it well.. whether you are for or against the white house... if he does his job well, he may do a great job for Apple..
cast aside your biases and look at the experience he has and the CONNECTIONS...
Apple isn't trying to hire Dick Cheney.
You’ve completely lost your marbles. Nice of you to come to a conclusion before the investigations have!
Yeah, the bad kind.
Maybe they should ask Dick Cheney he's an honest guy. /s
Last I checked, Dick Cheney was not being hired by Apple.
You shouldn't talk about yourself like that.
I'm HOPING that's all sarcasm. The man helped cover up Benghazi. He got caught = he sucks at his job.
Because there is nothing there. We've already had numerous investigations.
I remember when Reagan was President & 241 Marines were killed in Lebanon. Congress investigated more on the grounds of how can we stop this from happening again. Reagan decided to get out of Lebanon or cut & run in your vernacular. What's sad is how funding is cut to the Secretary of States budget by a certain party & then they try to place blame when the emabassy's lack the funding for the kind of security that may be needed.
Only a "certain party" eh?
"In fact, the Congressional Research Service has documented that Congress, whether led by Democrats and Republicans, year after year did not fully fund the various pots of money for embassy security. (See page 25.) The State Department, for instance, was shortchanged by $142 million in fiscal year 2010, when Democrats controlled both houses of Congress." - Glenn Kessler, Washington Post, 5/16/2013
But what about the State Department? Surely they asked for more funding, right?
Okay, they weren't fully funded. Their funding didn't meet the budget requests. But wait:
The problem wasn't lack of funding, as you predictably parroted Sen. Barbara Boxer. The problem was political decision-making in the Executive.
Time to lay off the weed, dude, your eggs are overcooked. Multiple investigations ? "nothing there". There are a lot of layers to our bureaucracy, and these things can take months to unravel.
Political double speak has Hillary + Obama on record claiming it was "a spontaneous protest to a video" and later, Hillary trying to play both sides of the fence. Military security was available, in spite of your fallacious suggestion that the mean ol' GOP took away her credit card. I believe the phrase is "spin and blame shift", in your vernacular. I know... what difference does it make, right?
You can just imagine how the beta male liberals on here would have reacted if it was known that Apple was hiring somebody who was politically connected to the right.
And this is still just an unconfirmed rumor. I will save my real rage and my real outrage for if and when it turns out to be true.
Apple likes to speak about diversity. How about hiring somebody who isn't a lunatic, lying liberal?
Cue Teabagger shit storm in 3-2-1...
Where the **** do you get the idea that > 50% of this country is Republican?
There is just a small contingency of AI fans who believe Apple is a Conservative Corporation.
bobschlob wrote: »
Cue Teabagger shit storm in 3-2-1...
And where did you get the idea that just Republicans have an extremely low opinion of this administration and anybody who is connected to it?
Independents can't stand the extremist in charge either.
The worst President since World War II, according to a recent poll. Republicans, Independents and more all agree. A few extremist, hardcore liberals are the only true supporters that this corrupt administration has left.
mdriftmeyer wrote: »
There is just a small contingency of AI fans who are mentally incompetent and believe Apple is a Conservative Corporation.