Think Secret's new design

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
What do you think of it?



Personally, I think it is now the ugliest rumor site. Icky.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 32
    ferroferro Posts: 453member
    Think Ugly...



    <a href="http://www.thinksecret.com"; target="_blank">www.thinksecret.com</a>



    ewwww...



    ------------------------------------

    E PLURIBUS UNIX





    [ 02-18-2002: Message edited by: FERRO ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 32
    jambojambo Posts: 3,036member
    I'd have to agree, it sucks majorly <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />



    J :cool:
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 32
    geekgeek Posts: 14member
    Wow... what a train wreck.



    Care to play "count the fonts"?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 32
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    That's oppressively ugly and cluttered.



    Thumbs down.



    (At least it has links to recent content, though, unlike some rumors sites I could name...*cough*)
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 32
    murbotmurbot Posts: 5,262member
    Hmm, I'm feeling freakish for not hating it as much as you guys...



    [ 02-18-2002: Message edited by: murbot ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 32
    applenutapplenut Posts: 5,768member
    I think its pretty interesting. I don't neccessarily like it but I like the fact that it's very different from the normal look.



    Actually, If they shortened the descriptions for the stories I think I would like it
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 32
    torifiletorifile Posts: 4,024member
    I don't know. It could be worse. At least it's logically organized.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 32
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    It's pretty bad, but it could be worse.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 32
    I guess I was expecting more, since this is the site's only redesign in two years.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 32
    ...informative yet yucky.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 32
    It was fine before, and this new look is not an improvement.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 32
    bodhibodhi Posts: 1,424member
    What Nick doesn't seem to figure out is that you should stick with like 2 different fonts on the front page. gEEk was right, WOW there are like 15 different fonts on that front page. Very hard to read.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 32
    It's insanely cluttered. Too hard to read. Too much information in too small a spot.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 32
    serranoserrano Posts: 1,806member
    eh
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 32
    screedscreed Posts: 1,077member
    The structure is fine, but the color could potentially be classified as a biological weapon of terror, at worst; a Halloween theme, at best.



    Follow the Apple hardware and stick with white, silver, graphite, etc.



    Screed ...how 'bout wood paneling!?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 32
    spartspart Posts: 2,060member
    That is horrid...de Plume has no taste when it comes to colors...*spasmic head jerk*.



    A few mins later and its already time for a redesign...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 32
    spartspart Posts: 2,060member
    [quote]Originally posted by Spart:

    <strong>That is horrid...de Plume has no taste when it comes to colors...*spasmic head jerk*.



    A few mins later and its already time for a redesign...</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I'm replying to myself...does this mean I'm schizophrenic? Nah...just hit the wrong button and too lazy to go back...plus I just detest that "Junior Member" tag so im trying to jack my post count up....anyway...



    Here is my design for a news & rumors site:



    <a href="http://popmac.cjb.net/template.html"; target="_blank">http://popmac.cjb.net/template.html</a>;



    Feedback anyone?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 32
    D'oh! I thought ya'll were talking about a new concelt for a piece of hardware...but yeah the site redisign is awfu.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 32
    The sad part is that Mr DePlume doesnt listen to criticism. Look at the thread going on in the TS board.

    Oh well, if HE thinks it's nice, that's all that matters.



    Come on AI, post some new rumors! Make them up if you have to.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 32
    [quote]Originally posted by CharlieBrownGirl:

    <strong>The sad part is that Mr DePlume doesnt listen to criticism. Look at the thread going on in the TS board.

    Oh well, if HE thinks it's nice, that's all that matters.



    Come on AI, post some new rumors! Make them up if you have to.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    and for those who are to lazy to find it, just click <a href="http://tsforums.loamic.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=3c758be84e11ffff;act=ST;f=7;t=43;s t=0" target="_blank">here</a> (BlueScanner linked from that thred to here!! )
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.