Rear shell for 5.5" 'iPhone 6' allegedly shown, measured in new video

245

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 95
    Friendly reminder: do not respond to the Best Buy blue shirt guy.
  • Reply 22 of 95

    For comparison, here are the dimensions for the Galaxy Note 3, which has a 5.7" screen: 







    151.2 mm (5.95 in) H; 79.2 mm (3.12 in) W; 8.3 mm (0.33 in) D
  • Reply 23 of 95
    Friendly reminder: do not respond to the Best Buy blue shirt guy.

    I hope that wasn't for me as I don't work for Best Buy.
  • Reply 24 of 95
    I can't wait until September 10th when all the Apple news sites start talking about the iPhone 6s.
  • Reply 25 of 95
    mazecookie wrote: »
    Apple's iCloud wasn't hacked.

    I think this is what people call it, no matter the details on the tech side.
    Plus, Apple has had 2 step verification implemented for some time, so a user cannot access this sort of data without verification from an existing approved device.

    That is opt-in though, not mandatory.
  • Reply 26 of 95
    Thus far the latest iPhone to be announced on September 9th will offer the following:
    Custom Actions
    iCloud Drive
    Nitro JavaScript engine for third party web browsers
    Photo Editing
    Sharing Options
    Third party keyboards
    Widgets


    Additionally, according to rumors Apple will offer:
    Multiple form factors (4", 4.7", 5.5")
    NFC
    Optical Image Stabilization


    I wonder what Android proponents will complain about next.
  • Reply 27 of 95
    droidftwdroidftw Posts: 1,009member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by blackbook View Post



    It will be fun to sees phablet iPhone in stores soon.



    As far as nomenclature. I hope Apple doesn't call this massive phone the "iPhone Air".



    The smaller 4.7 inch phone should be called "Air" while the larger model should be called the "Pro" model just like with the MacBooks.

     

    "iPhablet"

  • Reply 28 of 95
    MarvinMarvin Posts: 15,326moderator
    philboogie wrote: »
    mazecookie wrote: »
    Apple's iCloud wasn't hacked.

    I think this is what people call it, no matter the details on the tech side.

    People do use the word incorrectly. This happened with the news media where journalists were guessing the voicemail pin codes of celebrities to hear messages they could write stories about and it was called hacking but nobody would say the cellular network operators were to blame.

    There was a brute force script written to guess iCloud login passwords and it seems that iCloud didn't bother preventing multiple attempts. It's suspected that this was used.

    The use of passwords online needs to end altogether. A passcode should be local to a device and be used to protect strong private keys. Only public keys should be stored on the server. Private keys should be synced from one device to another locally.

    It's convenient, secure and it will never require a mass password reset after a breach. Logging in using a temporary machine is trickier but there can be a request via email for a temporary access key that has an expiry time.
  • Reply 29 of 95
    Two-factor authentication + server-side intrusion detection. That's all I will say on the subject. Back on topic.
  • Reply 30 of 95
    :D[quote name="kent909" url="/t/182043/rear-shell-for-5-5-iphone-6-allegedly-shown-measured-in-new-video#post_2587353"]I can't wait until September 10th when all the Apple news sites start talking about the iPhone 6s. Smirking...
  • Reply 31 of 95
    MarvinMarvin Posts: 15,326moderator
    How do we know this is not an iPod Touch?

    Mainly the slot for the sim tray on the side but it could also be one of those knockoff models.
  • Reply 32 of 95
    I don't like the design of the back panel but I could deal with it if apple has figured out a way to create a bezel free model.
  • Reply 33 of 95
    Originally Posted by blackbook View Post

    It will be fun to sees phablet iPhone in stores soon.

     

    Why?

     

    ...while the larger model should be called the “Pro” model...


     

    What is “professional” about a device too large to be used?

     

    Originally Posted by prokip View Post

    I just need a larger iPhone !!

     

    Why?

     

    Originally Posted by boredumb View Post

    Why not 'the Tall-ee'?

     

    You wound me, sir.

     

    Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post

    How do we know this is not an iPod Touch?

     

    I want to believe (that this absolute garbage isn’t a phone), but there’s no reason for antenna bands on an iPod touch.

     

    Originally Posted by SirLance99 View Post

    I've been at work for 3 hours and have about 10 customers ask or inquire about this already.

     

    Where do you work? The Nude Celebrities Hotline?

  • Reply 34 of 95
    Haha
  • Reply 35 of 95
    herbapouherbapou Posts: 2,228member
    mazecookie wrote: »

    Apple's iCloud wasn't hacked.

    "Hack" to people that don't know what hack means, means compromising anything, from anywhere.


    In the real world, hack means through a security flaw of a system, a malicious user was able to compromise a system and/or it's data.

    If these celebrities set their passwords to Password321, and it is guessed, that is not a hack. This also applies if their email account has been compromised and their Apple ID password has been changed unknowingly. That is not a hack. That is poor security management on the users end.

    A hack would be finding a backdoor (in this case to the Photo Stream and/or iCloud backup service) and targeting Apple ID's to steal data. That did not happen.

    Plus, Apple has had 2 step verification implemented for some time, so a user cannot access this sort of data without verification from an existing approved device. If you had celebrity status, where many, many people would like to compromise your accounts and details, you would undisputedly turn on the maximum security settings available.

    Good day.

    Allowing endless attemps at a password is a major security flaw... This was indeed an hack, they found a way to be able to try passwords without the account being frozen. This as nothing to do with passwords being weak, the only thing a robust password will change is it takes more time.
  • Reply 36 of 95
    Marvin wrote: »
    There was a brute force script written to guess iCloud login passwords and it seems that iCloud didn't bother preventing multiple attempts. It's suspected that this was used.

    Do you have an evidence that a brute force attack was used?

    The evidence I have seen (exif files, reporter statements indicating they were contacted about this prior to "The Happening", many images are not the celebrity in question or are photoshopped, etc.) suggests that this was a person who has traded such images in exchange for similar images for some time.
  • Reply 37 of 95
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by herbapou View Post





    Allowing endless attemps at a password is a major security flaw... This was indeed an hack, they found a way to be able to try passwords without the account being frozen



    You are correct. Fortunately, Apple doesn't allow an infinite amount of password attempts.



    Download Fiddler, set it up to send say, 1 request per second to the iCloud login handler:

    https://setup.icloud.com/setup/ws/1/login

     

    and post this data:

     

    {"apple_id":"[email protected]","password":"testpassword","extended_login":false}

     

    Obviously replacing values with whatever you want.



    See how long it takes them to freeze your IP from subsequent requests.

     

    If you would like to share who "they" are, or a post to the exact method on how it was hacked, or a post a hacker has made backing up what you just said, I would highly appreciate it.

     

    Edit: Oh and before somebody mentions easily changing the IP header, the same freeze is applied on the session id + account.

  • Reply 38 of 95
    blackbook wrote: »
    Most people don't even know it happened.

    Oh, I think they are quite aware of this now. It was all over the news this morning and the originating site was repeatedly named.
  • Reply 39 of 95
    mazecookie wrote: »

    You are correct. Fortunately, Apple doesn't allow an infinite amount of password attempts.


    Download Fiddler, set it up to send say, 1 request per second to the iCloud login handler:
    https://setup.icloud.com/setup/ws/1/login

    and post this data:

    {"apple_id":"[email protected]","password":"testpassword","extended_login":false}

    Obviously replacing values with whatever you want.


    See how long it takes them to freeze your IP from subsequent requests.

    If you would like to share who "they" are, or a post to the exact method on how it was hacked, or a post a hacker has made backing up what you just said, I would highly appreciate it.

    Edit: Oh and before somebody mentions easily changing the IP header, the same freeze is applied on the session id + account.

    This is why I suspect someone inside Apple culled these accounts or possibly a photo app was cracked, one with easy access to the photos.
  • Reply 40 of 95
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by MacBook Pro View Post



    Thus far the latest iPhone to be announced on September 9th will offer the following:

    Custom Actions

    iCloud Drive

    Nitro JavaScript engine for third party web browsers

    Photo Editing

    Sharing Options

    Third party keyboards

    Widgets





    Additionally, according to rumors Apple will offer:

    Multiple form factors (4", 4.7", 5.5")

    NFC

    Optical Image Stabilization





    I wonder what Android proponents will complain about next.



    Same old FUD:


    • Walled garden

    • Obsession with thinness

    • Battery life (see also "obsession with non-removable batteries")

    • Antennagate 2: antenna bands(TM)

    • No 1080p

    • Protruding lens ring

    • iCloud hack

    • But but but Edward Snowden

    • Proprietary Lightning connector instead of non-reversible USB Micro-B

    • No stereo speakers like HTC

Sign In or Register to comment.