Apple may not break out Apple Watch, iPod and retail sales starting Q1 2015

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in AAPL Investors edited October 2014
During its quarterly conference call for the fourth quarter of 2014, Apple announced it will introduce new financial reporting methods that lump Apple Watch and iPod with Apple TV and other accessories, with CEO Tim Cook suggesting the move is a good way to shield details on the upcoming smartwatch from competitors.



According to Apple's comments, the anticipated Apple Watch will be lumped together with iPod, Apple TV and accessory sales from Beats in a new category called "Other" when the company reports its financials in the first quarter of 2015. Major product lines like the iPhone, iPad and Mac will continue to be reported as separate categories.

While the exact method of reportage remains to be seen, at this point it seems Apple will not break out initial Apple Watch sales numbers.

The iPod product line has apparently lost its place at the table after entering free fall with the introduction of the iPhone in 2007. While strong, Apple TV sales are also not being moved in numbers significant enough to break out sales into its own segment.

"It says nothing about our expectations about the product," Cook said, adding that things could change in the future. "I'm not very anxious in reporting a lot of numbers on Apple Watch and giving a lot of detail because competitors look for it."

In addition, retail sales are to be combined with regional sales, meaning the current Retail segment breakout is going away. Apple also intends to incorporate Apple Pay into the Services category, alongside iTunes, software and other services.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 30
    Tim's not dumb, this is a smart thing to do. It'll sell well to early adopters, but it will be a year or two before it really takes off, I suspect. I'd be stunned to see an iPad-esque rate.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 30
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    Cook says Apple is in no hurry to provide Watch details because all their competitors are looking for it. I love it. :D
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 30
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    Tim's not dumb, this is a smart thing to do. It'll sell well to early adopters, but it will be a year or two before it really takes off, I suspect. I'd be stunned to see an iPad-esque rate.
    Could it also mean Apple has more things planned in this space (perhaps with Beats or home automation or additional wearables) so it becomes one big category for a lot of different things?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 30
    jd_in_sbjd_in_sb Posts: 1,600member
    They need to classify the Apple Watch as a "hobby"
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 30
    geekmeegeekmee Posts: 652member
    Smart move.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 30
    cpsrocpsro Posts: 3,264member

    Wimp! Even Amazon reports its Kindle sales.

    Oh, wait.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 30

    I don't care. 

     

    I think it is a smart business decision.

     

    Now take my money please and give me my watch already.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 30
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    rogifan wrote: »
    Cook says Apple is in no hurry to provide Watch details because all their competitors are looking for it. I love it. :D

    1) I don't know, that sounds like a BS answer to not being confident on how ?Watch is going to play out.

    2) JLG just touted Apple for their breaking out their unit sales and revenue.
    (A thank-you to Apple for providing actual unit and revenue numbers for their product lines— does any other company do that?)
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 30
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post





    1) I don't know, that sounds like a BS answer to not being confident on how ?Watch is going to play out.



    2) JLG just touted Apple for their breaking out their unit sales and revenue.



    Gassee will likely complement them on their Watch plans, however. Apple is a very different company now, lets say the Watch sells a million units in its first quarter: that'd be great...except every half-wit analyst would proclaim that Apple is doomed because they didn't sell sixty million, the Watch is a failure, etc. Better to be cautious with numbers at first.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 30
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    Gassee will likely complement them on their Watch plans, however. Apple is a very different company now...

    He just published that yesterday for today's Monday Note..
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 30
    pazuzupazuzu Posts: 1,728member
    But of course- Apple Watch must be a "hobby".
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 30
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post





    He just published that yesterday for today's Monday Note..



    Maybe I should clarify my point a little better. Apple is a different company today than they were in 2007 or 2010. Back then, if they'd launched a new device and reported one million in sales for a new product, it was okay. Today it would set the internet on fire.

     

    So it's okay, to me, to start off by potentially hiding detailed numbers.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 30
    pazuzupazuzu Posts: 1,728member
    [quote name="Rogifan" url="/t/182941/apple-may-not-break-out-apple-watch-ipod-and-retail-sales-starting-q1-2015#post_2623649"]Cook says Apple is in no hurry to provide Watch details because all their competitors are looking for it. I love it. :D[/quote

    Read : we don't have faith in it.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 30
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    Maybe I should clarify my point a little better. Apple is a different company today than they were in 2007 or 2010. Back then, if they'd launched a new device and reported one million in sales for a new product, it was okay. Today it would set the internet on fire.

    So it's okay, to me, to start off by potentially hiding detailed numbers.

    I feel transparency is better for Apple, and no reasonable person — which of course means no analysts or people with two-z's in their username — will comment that 1 million unit sales per quarter isn't a lot, but we're talking hundreds of millions of dollars and we'll still be able to get a general idea based on how their Accessories category changes from QtQ and YoY.

    How many $350 and up watches does the Swatch Group sell per quarter? Their entire market cap is $23B, and their gross revenue and net profit for all of 2013 are $8.8 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively. (Is any other watch maker bigger than Swatch Group?) Rolex did about half that in revenue for all of 2013. Only 1 million units per quarter out of the gate at an average of $350 per unit (the lowest possible) is $1.4 billion, which I think is huge.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 30
    Of course if you're a hater, you might as well get in your knocks first. It's not like Tim cook sis we will never break out a-watch sales forever. It will start out life that way - if sales merit, then maybe as early as Q2, they will start breaking sales but Tim is perfectly honest in saying exactly what's what - basically when we are ready to, we will.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 30
    boredumbboredumb Posts: 1,418member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post

    ... and we'll still be able to get a general idea based on how their Accessories category changes from QtQ and YoY.

    That's a good point, but tricky, as there are still three major variables in that calculation (the ?Watch itself, the continuing slow death of the iPod, ands the impact of either significantly changing ?TV or not)...

    Plus, the huge whoosh of Beats sales without Bose holding them back!  /:

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 30
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

    ......... Cook said, adding that things could change in the future. "I'm not very anxious in reporting a lot of numbers on Apple Watch and giving a lot of detail because competitors look for it."

     

     

    Very true, another thing competitors will be looking for is what material is being used and how its being manufactured.

    That will be kept secrete for as long as possible, maybe February or March before those facts see the light of day.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 30
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    solipsismx wrote: »
    1) I don't know, that sounds like a BS answer to not being confident on how ?Watch is going to play out.

    2) JLG just touted Apple for their breaking out their unit sales and revenue.

    Well I don't agree. Apple should only report what SEC requires. And if they want to tout launch weekend iPhone, iPad ?Watch etc. sales via press release fine. Nobody else releases sales figures why should Apple. So after a really good quarter the media concern trolls can focus on lackluster iPad sales? I say the less information the better.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 30
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post





    1) I don't know, that sounds like a BS answer to not being confident on how ?Watch is going to play out.



    2) JLG just touted Apple for their breaking out their unit sales and revenue.



    I read that as "JGL just touted..." and got very confused. He's a very talented guy, but I figured he'd stick to acting and producing...

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 30
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    pazuzu wrote: »
    rogifan wrote: »
    Cook says Apple is in no hurry to provide Watch details because all their competitors are looking for it. I love it. :D

    Read : we don't have faith in it.

    No, read: we don't need the competition to know sales figures and ASPs.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.