Time's Person of the Year honor goes to 'the Ebola fighters,' not Apple CEO Tim Cook

245

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 89



    Tim is a very honorable person and has been an outstanding leader at Apple, taking the position under extremely difficult circumstances. But that said, choosing him as 'Person of the Year' with all the brushfires going on in the world right now would have been a tone deaf decision.

     

    I really like their choice. Other illnesses kill far more people, but the hysteria and fear factor associated with the ebola outbreak, together with the health workers selfless sacrifice make them laudable. 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 89

    Good choice.

    Bravo, brave Ebola-fighters!

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 89
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    Why on earth should it have gone to Tim Cook? Announcing a watch is hardly more important than fighting an incredibly lethal epidemic.

    It wouldn't have been for ?Watch, it would have been for coming out. But that was hardly the most newsworthy or important thingthat happened in 2014.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 89
    jungmarkjungmark Posts: 6,928member
    Not a bad choice. Perhaps Media should be person of the year for over -hyping it and controlling the narrative on certain other stories.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 89
    cpsrocpsro Posts: 3,285member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by TheWhiteFalcon View Post

    I'm really confused how this was deemed important enough. It was inflated by the media to distract people for a few months, and now it's a non-issue again.

    Ok, you go clean up the mess.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 89
    malaxmalax Posts: 1,598member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by GQB View Post

     

    Not to mention endless media stoked "needless panic" that (hmmmm) completely stopped the day after the election.


    Any data to back this up?  The media are basically click-whores.  If there were any infected people within 1000 miles of the US they would be back to scare mongering.

     

    But suppose your media conspiracy is true.  What's the theory behind it?  Who did it help to get people anxious about disease before the election?  Was it a (very subtle) way to suppress the minority vote somehow?  Or was it a failed attempt to get people to support the Democrat's healthcare agenda?

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 89
    sdw2001sdw2001 Posts: 18,070member

    Dumb.  As bad as when the person of the year was "you."   

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 89
    defeats the purpose of the person of the year. just call it person/people/group/movement of the year.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 29 of 89
    nagrommenagromme Posts: 2,834member
    Two good choices. Can't go wrong!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 30 of 89
    apple ][apple ][ Posts: 9,233member

    This was a poor decision and many of those ebola doctors returning to the US can not be trusted, as some have been caught lying and exposing the public to the deadly disease. If somebody wishes to travel to Africa to help, then that's fine, go right ahead, but don't go importing the disease and helping to spread it worldwide by returning to the US, and not following common sense precautions. And these people are supposed to be medical personel, yet some of them act no different than rats carrying bubonic plague.

     

    There should be a mandatory quarantine for all of them who return to the US, no ifs, ands or buts about it. If they do not agree, then they should not be allowed to set foot back in the country. Also, all border security should obviously be tightened, not opened up, like some people wish. There are enough questionable and illegal people entering the US. Who knows what sicknesses, diseases and viruses these people carry.

     

    As I stated a few days ago though, I am not surprised that Tim Cook did not win. This is Time magazine that we are talking about here.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 31 of 89
    bigpicsbigpics Posts: 1,397member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by SolipsismY View Post



    Doh! I never considered they would have multiple magazine covers to help push more copies.

     

     

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by mpantone View Post

     



    Other magazines have done this before. 

     

    Probably Playboy, maybe the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue.

     

    Not a new concept in periodical publishing.


     

    Happens every month in the Comics/graphic novel worlds, where "created collectibles" to increase sales is a time-honored tradition...

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 32 of 89
    bigpicsbigpics Posts: 1,397member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by TheWhiteFalcon View Post

     

    I'm really confused how this was deemed important enough. It was inflated by the media to distract people for a few months, and now it's a non-issue again.


     

    It was a created media feeding frenzy issue in America where Ebola was never going to be a threat unless it had a sizable spontaneous mutation, but a huge and real issue in poor African countries with almost no health infrastructure and many other variables making it difficult to get a handle on the outbreak.

     

    And some of these countries have lost many key people of the few they did have... ...with health, geopolitical, economic and other major consequences that will effect them for years.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 33 of 89
    netroxnetrox Posts: 1,581member

    I am sure Tim Cook feels that the Ebola fighters deserve it more. 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 34 of 89
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by KumarN View Post



    Self-righteous - surely you jest.

    I guess you must have missed this one: http://www.people.com/article/ebola-nurse-breaks-quarantine-maine

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 35 of 89
    pazuzupazuzu Posts: 1,728member
    EBola hasn't been conquered yet but the Democratic Party has - the American voter should have won as Republicans have been tsunamied into Congress releasing the nation's chokehold.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 36 of 89
    malaxmalax Posts: 1,598member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by netrox View Post

     

    I am sure Tim Cook feels that the Ebola fighters deserve it more.


    Agreed.  Frankly it would have been a PR nightmare for Apple if Time had selected Cook (while mentioning all the other runners-up).

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 37 of 89
    malaxmalax Posts: 1,598member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by SDW2001 View Post

     

    Dumb.  As bad as when the person of the year was "you."  


    You're just jealous that they selected me instead of you.  Oh wait. :)

     

    (see 2006 if you don't know what we're talking about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Person_of_the_Year)

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 38 of 89
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by pazuzu View Post



    EBola hasn't been conquered yet but the Democratic Party has - the American voter should have won as Republicans have been tsunamied into Congress releasing the nation's chokehold.

    Take this crap elsewhere -- e.g., PoliticalInsider.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 39 of 89
    malax wrote: »
    Agreed.  But AI characterizing this as Cook being "spurned" is absurd.  Oftentimes the person of the year is news-making tyrant (e.g., Hitler and Stalin (twice)).  It's not a popularity contest.
    That explains why Putin would be in the running.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 40 of 89

    Yeah, give this to people involved in one of the biggest overblown "news" stories of the year. Sheesh.

     

    "Time" is not worth the pulp it's printed on. 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.