Apple to keep century-old historic barn on Campus 2 grounds

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2015
In keeping with late Apple cofounder Steve Jobs' Campus 2 land reclamation plan, a nearly 100-year-old barn will be saved from demolition to stand surrounded by trees at one corner of the huge lot.


Historic Glendenning Barn as seen in a dedication ceremony in March 2004. | Source: Cupertino Historical Society


With its ambitious Campus 2 facility, Apple is putting an emphasis on futuristic design, as evidenced by a circular glass-clad "spaceship" headquarters building, underground mega-theater and other supporting structures. But Jobs, who had more than a helping hand in the project, dreamed of returning 80 percent of the concrete sprawl laid down by former owner Hewlett-Packard to green space.

As part of the land reclamation initiative, Apple has decided to keep the historic Glendenning Barn intact as part of the build, reports the San Jose Mercury News.

"When they're finished, the land will look much more like it did 50 or 100 years ago than it looked five years ago," said former Cupertino Mayor Orrin Mahoney. "The barn fits into that."

Named after the Glendenning family, whose patriarch Robert Glendenning first settled the 160-acre plot in Santa Clara Valley 1850, the barn dates back to 1916 and bore witness to Silicon Valley's boom. The building stood as the lot transformed from an orchard into the foundation for modern business buildings owned by Varian Associates, then HP, and now Apple.

According to the Cupertino Historical Society, Apple carefully dismantled the barn and numbered its many pieces for reconstruction after Campus 2's modern facilities are complete. Apple also stored redwood salvaged from a nearby grove to replace boards that may potentially be damaged during the reconstruction process.

Glendenning barn will be relocated to a spot near Apple's new $74 million fitness center at the site's northwest corner. In its new role at Apple, old wood structure will serve as a storage facility for sports equipment, landscaping supplies and other maintenance materials needed to tend the grounds.

The $5 billion Campus 2 project was first pitched by Jobs to the Cupertino City Council in 2011. CEO Tim Cook expects to move into the enormous main structure by 2016.
«1345

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 83
    Nice of them but from an European viewpoint 100 years is not long time ago ;-)
  • Reply 2 of 83
    It's hilarious to see Americans get misty eyed at these 'historical monuments'.
    To most of Europe that picture just looks like a relatively new shed.
  • Reply 3 of 83
    sflocalsflocal Posts: 6,093member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by amoradala View Post



    It's hilarious to see Americans get misty eyed at these 'historical monuments'.

    To most of Europe that picture just looks like a relatively new shed.



    Well... the way I read it, this is an article about something inside the U.S., and not in Europe.  So what's "historic" for the U.S. is still valid.  I lived in Germany for five years, and while I do agree that 100 years is a speck of time compared to Europe, I do appreciate that some things we consider "old" is preserved.  That barn will be a nice contrast to the futuristic Apple headquarters when it's finished.



    You're comment does come across as snobbish.  What Europeans think of us Americans preserving our "old" stuff is something I couldn't give one rat's a$$ about.

  • Reply 4 of 83
    Blistering Barnacles!

    The past is the future.

    I guess this was Jobs's hobby shed where he went for quiet time away from the wife, and where he invented the Apple TV, and where Ive invented Apple's newest hobby, the Apple Watch.
  • Reply 5 of 83
    Nice of them but from an European viewpoint 100 years is not long time ago ;-)
    amoradala wrote: »
    It's hilarious to see Americans get misty eyed at these 'historical monuments'.
    To most of Europe that picture just looks like a relatively new shed.

    Nice of you two but from an anthropologist's viewpoint European architecture is not long time ago.

    Nice of me but from a geologist's viewpoint early man's cave art is not long time ago.

    ...
  • Reply 6 of 83
    tyler82tyler82 Posts: 1,101member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by amoradala View Post



    It's hilarious to see Americans get misty eyed at these 'historical monuments'.

    To most of Europe that picture just looks like a relatively new shed.





    And your technology is just as dated.

    Nokia?

    Siemens?

    LOL. 

  • Reply 7 of 83
    solipsismy wrote: »
    Nice of them but from an European viewpoint 100 years is not long time ago ;-)
    amoradala wrote: »
    It's hilarious to see Americans get misty eyed at these 'historical monuments'.
    To most of Europe that picture just looks like a relatively new shed.

    Nice of you two but from an anthropologist's viewpoint European architecture is not long time ago.

    Nice of me but from a geologist's viewpoint early man's cave art is not long time ago.

    ...

    My posts on this forum are not that old, but are they historical?

    I would hope so.
  • Reply 8 of 83
    welshdogwelshdog Posts: 1,897member

    This is interesting to learn since Apple tends to focus on the future. They have no corporate museum because they don't dwell on past achievements. I wonder how the discussion went in the meeting where this barn was deigned worth preserving?

  • Reply 9 of 83
    clemynxclemynx Posts: 1,552member
    tyler82 wrote: »


    And your technology is just as dated.
    Nokia?
    Siemens?
    LOL. 

    Come on, no need to turn this into an Europe vs America debate.

    That said, Siemens is still huge, especially for nuclear power production.
  • Reply 10 of 83
    eriamjheriamjh Posts: 1,642member
    Anybody got the coordinates via google maps of this barn, to put its location in perspective with the new campus?
  • Reply 11 of 83
    dachardachar Posts: 330member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by tyler82 View Post

     





    And your technology is just as dated.

    Nokia?

    Siemens?

    LOL. 


     

    ARM is a leader in microprocessor Intellectual Property based in Cambridge, England. Most, including Apple, would not say their latest chips are dated. 

  • Reply 12 of 83
    Nice of them but from an European viewpoint 100 years is not long time ago ;-)
    amoradala wrote: »
    It's hilarious to see Americans get misty eyed at these 'historical monuments'.
    To most of Europe that picture just looks like a relatively new shed.
    Nice of them but from an European viewpoint 100 years is not long time ago ;-)

    amoradala wrote: »
    It's hilarious to see Americans get misty eyed at these 'historical monuments'.
    To most of Europe that picture just looks like a relatively new shed.

    I see the two condescending Europeans circle jerked one another with a thumb's up.

    The value of the Barn or any barn is for those who have direct history with it. I doubt you have history with Stonehenge, right?


    Steve has direct history with that Barn as a kid and those former orchards. Young nations will always hear the condescension from the old nations. Of course, the young nation must remind the old that they shot their wad long ago and like all old rotting fruit need assisted living from the young nation.
  • Reply 13 of 83
    chadbagchadbag Posts: 2,000member
    Even in the US, 100 years is not "old" in absolute time (European peoples have been in North America since the 1500s (Spanish)). But in terms or architecture, and past periods, even from 50 years ago there might be buildings worth saving if there was some sort of historical context for it.
  • Reply 14 of 83
    splifsplif Posts: 603member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Benjamin Frost View Post





    My posts on this forum are not that old, but are they historical?



    I would hope so.



    Nope. Hysterical maybe.;)

  • Reply 15 of 83
    apple ][apple ][ Posts: 9,233member

    It's funny to read the irrelevant comments from a few condescending neanderthals from the old continent who venture into this thread with their misguided and ridiculous perspective on things. That's all that they got left, reminiscing about the past and the good old days, because the future is looking mighty bleak for that old continent, especially since the mass migrations of recent years. 

     

    Meanwhile, over here, the future's so bright, I gotta wear damn shades.

  • Reply 16 of 83
    splif wrote: »
    My posts on this forum are not that old, but are they historical?


    I would hope so.


    Nope. Hysterical maybe.;)

    Hysterical and historical would do me fine.
  • Reply 17 of 83
    apple ][ wrote: »
    It's funny to read the irrelevant comments from a few condescending neanderthals from the old continent who venture into this thread with their misguided and ridiculous perspective on things. That's all that they got left, reminiscing about the past and the good old days, because the future is looking mighty bleak for that old continent, especially since the mass migrations of recent years. 

    Meanwhile, over here, the future's so bright, I gotta wear damn shades.

    The enthusiasm of America is fun to see.
  • Reply 18 of 83
    flaneurflaneur Posts: 4,526member
    The more important factor is that the barn was almost certainly built from old-growth redwood, virtually unobtainable today. This alone makes it worth any effort of preservation. Hats off to Apple for keeping their eco-psychedelic origins alive.
  • Reply 19 of 83
    This barn has been very unsympathetically restored within the last 10 years.

    Why save this characterless barn yet allow Jobs to destroy the much more architecturally interesting Spanish Colonial revival Jackling House on his property a few years ago ?

    Americans sanctify the pointless and destroy the magnificent. The old Penn Station was destroyed, as would Grand Central have been had it not been for Jackie Kennedy at al.
  • Reply 20 of 83
    asciiascii Posts: 5,936member

    It's pretty cool that something made of wood has lasted 100 years.

Sign In or Register to comment.