AppleInsider's updated commenting guidelines

124»

Comments

  • Reply 61 of 69
    Mike Wuerthelemike wuerthele Posts: 7,264administrator
    Minor update to the posting rules, to clarify ad hominem. 

    In short, don't do it. To anybody, on the forums or not. This has been a big, big problem as of late.
    edited June 2019
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 62 of 69
    Mike Wuerthelemike wuerthele Posts: 7,264administrator
    Another update to the posting rules, with specific additions surrounding the COVID-19 outbreak.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 63 of 69
    None of my posts were offensive, perhaps derogatory and perhaps I used a cuss word, I don’t recall. I still argue that banning me from viewing Or contributing to conversations is over the top. Perhaps the censorship bureau could reinstate my community privileges.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 64 of 69
    Mike Wuerthelemike wuerthele Posts: 7,264administrator
    Phobos7 said:
    None of my posts were offensive, perhaps derogatory and perhaps I used a cuss word, I don’t recall. I still argue that banning me from viewing Or contributing to conversations is over the top. Perhaps the censorship bureau could reinstate my community privileges.
    You seem to have posted fine here. I'm not sure what you're talking about, as the account you're posting from has no restrictions on it.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 65 of 69
    Mike Wuerthelemike wuerthele Posts: 7,264administrator
    Updated with a new rule prohibiting comments suggesting that something is AI-generated.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 66 of 69
    jSnivelyjsnively Posts: 463administrator
    I added Character accounts to our Guidelines. Please don't do do this. We want actual people here :smile: 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 67 of 69
    Mike Wuerthelemike wuerthele Posts: 7,264administrator
    Updated with a rule about attacking a post author, instead of what you should be doing in criticizing the post opinion.
    edited July 31
    muthuk_vanalingam
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 68 of 69
    sphericspheric Posts: 2,805member
    Updated with a rule about attacking a post author, instead of what you should be doing in criticizing the post opinion.
    What kind of idiot would write that rule! 

    No…err…wait: 

    What an idiotic rule! 

    (Did I do it right?)
    muthuk_vanalingam
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 69 of 69
    Mike Wuerthelemike wuerthele Posts: 7,264administrator
    Updated with a rule about using your own words, not ChatGPT.

    We may rescind this someday, but it isn't today. Make your own points.
    muthuk_vanalingam
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.